Why did the Evo fail?
no ecoboost
>>17577622
because it was a car from the early 2000s sold as new and full price in the late 2010's with a bunch of go fast parts bolted on
>>17577622
$50k for a souped up fwd grocery getter with a transfer case when you could get a Corvette or Mustang, etc for the same price.
>>17577622
>No "middle ground" version like the WRX is to the STi
>No wagon variant
>Hard to live with as a daily driver due to weird torque/boost curve
>>17577693
There was the Lancer Ralliart.
>>17577622
Awful interior, NVH. Too pricey. Rest of the Mitsubishi lineup didn't sell enough to keep the Evo viable.
>>17577622
RRRRANCE EVOWWWW`~!
>>17577745
MISHUFIRINGU SHYSHUTEMU