Lamborghini or Ferrari?

ferrari

>>17550646
>VAG or FIAT?

Ferrari. Lamborghini have literally been born out of butthurt, are scared of motorsports and have produced basically nothing but gaudy boy's bedroom poster cars for the last 40 years. Also they're the go-to brand for babby's first millionaire supercar, so their drivers usually are complete ass hats.

Lambo

File: IMG_0786_zpsac772057.jpg (138KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 1024x768px

>>17550653
The aventador is truly a peice of art. Have you ever heard an aventador engine in person? Videos don't do it justice.

Lots of aventador owners in my area, and you can hear an aventador a mile away. It has a distinct engine noise. When you hear it, you just know it's an aventador.

Its orgasm to your ears.

Such a beautiful fucking car and the sound of that roaring engine is amazing.

Ferrari. Cars. Racing. Personalities. Lamborghini wish it is as well known. If Ferrari compete in the lawnmower market, i think they may even outsold Lamborghini.

>>17550653
>Also they're the go-to brand for babby's first millionaire supercar
>>17550661
>Lots of aventador owners in my area
Basically proving my point. How many Ferraris in your area?

>>17550653
this. seems like people who have a lot of money but know nothing about cars get lambos

File: 2003-tvr-tuscan-t440r-5.jpg (150KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 800x450px

>>17550646
TVR

>>17550697
>brand with forced exclusionary clauses and "you don't actually own your own car you're just licensing it" shitheadedness and "if you remove our badges from our cars we'll be the most butthurt collection of manchildren ever
>not a popular brand

Incapable of guessing how this came to be.

Fuck both of them.

>>17550661
>californian
> liberal
> redditor
> voted for bernie

This is you.

>>17550755
Actually

>new Yorker in a liberal shithole of a city
>republican
>4channer
>voted for trump

Nice try

File: e93.jpg (67KB, 1200x740px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1200x740px

>>17550760
>>4channer
>>voted for trump

>>17550760
>4channer
L M A O

>>17550755
Where did the Lamborghini touch you?

>>17550796
Most of us have you CNN indoctrinated dildo

>>17550646
Ferrari by far

>>17550744
Isn't that literally one car?

>>17550661
>Lots of aventador owners in my area, and you can hear an aventador a mile away. It has a distinct engine noise. When you hear it, you just know it's an aventador.
Yes, thanks. I really want everyone in my neighborhood to know how insecure I am about my new money. Fuckin lol.

>>17550646
Ferrari. When you want a luxurious, fast car but you have no need to compensate for anything. Just like the saying is "dress to kill" and not "dress to overkill". A Ferrari is a timeless classic blend of sophisticated luxury and performance with no need of overt flashiness or excess.

When you drive a Ferrari, you know who you are. When you have to roar around a Lambo, you are a just made it nobody who is obviously compensating. Have some balls and drive a real mans car.

>>17550646
Ferrari.
Not that Lambos don't look good, they just don't have the kind of styling Ferraris do.
I'm biased as fuck, but still.

>>17550646
Porsche.

Id be ok in a huracan.

Although the new ferrari superfast..

Has an amazing thing going.

Hmm.. maybe when i escape the circus.

>>17550646
Porsche.

>>17550646

>McLaren
>Ferrari
>Lamborghini
>Porsche

>>17550646
Not a Ferrari fan but I have to go with Ferrari here.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (55KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1280x720px

knawwwwwledge

>>17551946
Ferrari interiors are known not to last or be luxurious, kid

>>17550661
>t. ferruccio lamborghini

>>17552355
>extra weight

Have to compromise.

File: F40_Ferrari_20090509.jpg (117KB, 1200x692px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1200x692px

the definition of turbo lag

you need some MASSIVE balls to drive this thing hard

Lamborghinis are more badass

Ferraris are classier

>>17552368
Ferruccio Lamborghini has been rotating in his grave since his death.

File: Thatsitimdone.gif (2MB, 294x220px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 294x220px

>>17550760
>4channer

How is being terminally autistic going?

>>17550646
>Aston Martin

Both brands have been co-opted as collector's items for wealthy arabs, and most likely will never been driven to their full potential.

File: 1429396509565.gif (3MB, 386x232px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 386x232px

>>17550760
>voting

File: IMG_6502.jpg (616KB, 2560x1600px) Image search: [Google]

616KB, 2560x1600px

>>17550646
Lamborghini is very clear in it only cares about looks and looks only, beginning with the aventador and its countless edges. Ever since the aventador was created, lamborghini has put its same engine into 3 different "super exclusive" cars that fetch $3 million+ when each of them are merely aventadors with body kits. Lamborghini is too status-focused for me to choose them over ferrari

lamberarri

>>17553157
>Lamborghini is very clear in it only cares about looks and looks only
Yet you can't really tell. Unless you are a teenager or you are just into batmobile looking cars.

>>17550646
Neither. McLaren.

File: Heffner-Lamborghini-Murciélago-TT-121.jpg (232KB, 626x382px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 626x382px

>>17550646
Lamborghini exists because a tractor manufacturer found Ferrari didn't live up to his expectation of what a supercar should be.

>>17550646
>Italian
>ever

>>17550752
t. Failed supercar boutique

>>17553157
>Lamborghini is more status focused
I don't know family. The Huracan Performante set the Burgerkingring record for ICE cars after all.

I feel like Lamborghini is for the eccentric good guy millionaire who's still a regular person at heart while Ferrari is for those who see themselves as above the rest of society.

Of course, this is not true in every case but there does seem to be a visible pattern.

>>17553267
Fuck off, Tyler.

>>17550838
jej

don't compare the two. Lamborghini is for the rich fuckboys and retarded celebs. zero racing pedigree, zero history.

Ferrari is better likened with the likes of Mclaren and Porsche. real nigga shit.

tfw i will never own a countach

>>17552212
Mclaren all day every day.

>>17550646
Gt-r

File: McLaren-MP4player.jpg (371KB, 1600x1067px) Image search: [Google]

371KB, 1600x1067px

>>17550646

File: fIyqcB2.jpg (1MB, 2040x1360px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2040x1360px

rather buy a Snek and a house, or some Porsches or something

File: what is aleppo.jpg (39KB, 699x344px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 699x344px

>>17550760
>4channer
i don't even
>voted for trump
not voting for the better person

File: 2017-Ford-GT-PLACEMENT-626x382.jpg (60KB, 626x382px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 626x382px

>>17550646
Ford

>>17553111
>has been dead since his death
hmmm

>>17553851
You can't exactly rotate in your grave if you're not dead yet, unless you're morbid enough to lie test in it.

lambo.
desu they both seem the same to me in terms of who owns them. the only thing about ferrari is the exclusivitiy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbZt32qN6lA

>>17550721
saggy

>>17553584
mclarens are nice

File: maxresdefault (4).jpg (382KB, 2048x1366px) Image search: [Google]

382KB, 2048x1366px

ferrari

this is the best looking car ever made

File: 2016-mclaren-570s-top-inline-photo-658460-s-original.jpg (49KB, 843x515px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 843x515px

>>17553584
This

File: maxresdefault (6).jpg (100KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1280x720px

>>17554046

Miura was probably one of Lamborghini's only good cars, most of the new ones are boring and look the same model after model.

>>17550796
>>>>>extra meme arrows makes my point more valid

>>17554046
>this is the best looking car ever made
That's not a Lamborghini Miura.

File: 1496806552787.jpg (1MB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x960px

>>17550646
https://www.pornhub.com/users/stuglyfeofficial

>>17550646
All lambos look the exact same.
Ferrari has variety

>>17554188
Yes my fellow Miura lover.

Most people only really buy supercars to pick up thots, so why not just buy a Lotus and spend the rest on lube?

>>17550760
>4channer

F U C K I N G D I E

>>17550646
Fuck FCA and VAG. I would only drive a Ford GT.

>>17550755
Montanian
Anarcho monarchist
Facebooker
Voted for jill

>>17555349
>Anarcho monarchist
is that like a Hoppean?

>>17550650
wow, put in those terms it's a much easier choice, FCA is the master race.
HOWEVER Lamborghini can't really be compared to the rest of VAG's products, except maybe Porsche. And that's a stretch.
>>17550653
>scared of motorsports
>what is Nürburgring

>>17550661
the F12 sounds better, so another L for Lamborghini.

>>17550646
Lambo

I wouldn't even drive it very much, I just like how they look. I'd get something more fun to actually drive.

File: roadster_21-aventador.jpg (332KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 1920x1080px

voting twice

>>17554188
>Miura is Lamborghini's best looking car
>meanwhile the F40, Daytona, 250 GT all look better

another L.

>>17555388
>I'd get something more fun to actually drive.
said the guy who never drove one

>>17553331
>good guy millionaire who's still a regular person at heart
Get real.

>>17553512
You have no face

File: pagani-huayra-roadster-2017-geneva-auto-show_100595497_l.jpg (214KB, 1024x680px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 1024x680px

Lambos are driven by nigger rappers and nuveau-riche prople who have no idea of how their car works and never went above 200km/h.

Ferraris are kinda the same but at least there's many actual enthusiasts who drives them properly and are not some smug faggot wanting attention.

Anyway, personally i'd take a Pagani which are truly pieces of art.

>>17550646
porsche

>>17555635
>prople who have no idea of how their car works
lmao this guy has a lambo now (although he is less ignorant than when he made the video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2eYFTC7jwo
>it holds 85 liters even though it's a 4.2 liter which really confuses me over time because I have no idea what I'm talking about
>it's a 4.2 liter car but it has 85 liters of fuel which i think is quite impressive

>>17550646
Lamborghini or Ferarari? Who gives a shit? We're gonna put Lamborghini on a Ferrari and then you're gonna give a shit!

>>17550697
That's because Ferrari literally doesn't make anything that competes with the Aventador. Between the $250k 488 and $1M TheFerrari, they only make GT cars which are not directly comparable to the Aventador.

File: 1499790997399.jpg (47KB, 634x391px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 634x391px

>>17555707
>We're gonna put Lamborghini on a Ferrari
I just put a Ferrari on my shitbox instead

>>17550744
>brand with forced exclusionary clauses and "you don't actually own your own car you're just licensing it" shitheadedness and "if you remove our badges from our cars we'll be the most butthurt collection of manchildren ever
but that's a huge meme
Deadmau5 tried to sell it as a "Purrari" and that's where they had to jump in. They don't give a fuck what you do to your car as long as you're not selling it with a name that threatens the brand.

>>17550653
>Lamborghini have literally been born out of butthurt
Who builds tractors because they're butthurt? Lamborghini has been around as is almost as old as the first 125S Ferrari ever built.

>scared of motorsports
You obviously don't follow motorsports.

File: 975281289204.jpg (75KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 612x612px

>>17550646
which ever one is easiest for an LS-swap.

File: ce51766a.jpg (74KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 960x720px

>>17555821
you know she wants it

Who cares, they'll both get BTFO by electric supercars anyway.

File: W8_4.jpg (109KB, 500x229px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 500x229px

>>17550646
Vector

>>17555808
>You obviously don't follow motorsports
Where is Lamborghini competitive again? Blancpain? Don't make me laugh.

>>17555635
>gape between tire and fender so big I can fit my dick in it
no excuse for this shit

Lix
At
Mgain
Bony
O
R
G
H
I
N
I

>>17555870
>implying GT3 isn't one of the most competitive racing category in the world

Yep, he doesn't follow racing at all.

File: 1499413313054.png (1MB, 1334x750px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1334x750px

>>17555885
>gt3 is competitive

>>17555922
Name another formula that currently exists that has just as many participants competing in the biggest races of year. I dare you.

Lamborghini got into making cars because Ferrari's consumer vehicles were absolute shit. That said, if I had the money for Lamborghini's more expensive car, I'd buy a Rolls Royce Dawn instead. Or just buy a Mazda 3, and invest the rest of the money so I'm not a poor nigger with a fancy car.

>>17556038
>investing money to pay for things he doesn't enjoy

Get a load of this faggot.

Lamborghini. I'm not a race car driver and never will, I just want the fastest and loudest. Leave composure to the Germans.

>>17556104
>I just want the fastest and loudest
you got any chaw?

File: 1494564258245.jpg (37KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 540x540px

>caring about racing

>>17556173
Depends on how well you can take a dick.

>>17555971
IndyCars, WEC, literally any touring car series, V8 Supercars. Could go on.

>>17550646
GT-R

>>17556222
>IndyCars
Spec Dallara chassis with the only significant difference being whether it was Chevy or Honda who made the V6 engine. Nobody uses this formula outside of this series. Only high profile race is the Indy 500.

>WEC
LMP1 is a dying formula. LMP2 is essentially a spec series since everybody drives the same chassis and engine. GTE only has a combined 9 teams competing between Pro and Am classes. The only big race is the LM24.

>literally any touring car series
You'll have to be more specific since "touring car" can mean anything from some HS kid's '98 Accord to a DTM.

>V8 Supercars.
Only 3 manufacturers. Only ~20 teams. Only notable race is Bathurst. Nobody uses this formula outside of this series.
FYI: They don't even call it V8 Supercars anymore.

>Could go on.
Please do. My sides have not fully detached from your most recent embarrassment.

>>17556208
keep that gay shit to yourself

>>17556494
More Lambos and chaw for me, then.

File: 1498378424225m.jpg (155KB, 1024x493px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 1024x493px

>>17556432
Ah yes, GT3 being "the most competitive racing everrr" explains why it's the "literally who" of all track racing.

WEC on the other hand is gaining traction. I don't understand where you got "LMP1 is dying" meme when loads of different manufacturers have expressed interest in developing a car for the class.
>the only big race is the LM24
Is that why its viewer numbers are second to only Formula 1?

The only reason people use the GT3 formula in different series is because it happens to be cheap. You can buy cars that are already built for the team, no assembly required. But no-one outside of the GT autism club gives a hoot about GT3s. Viewers are not interested in watching babbys first racing series with third rate drivers.
>high profile race
There are no "high profile races" for GT3s. That's because no-one cares. And why would they with most drivers being washouts from other more respectable series or rookie drivers aspiring to get into WEC or IMSA.

File: hqdefault.jpg (16KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 480x360px

>>17556514
>More Lambos

File: sonny and rico.jpg (48KB, 640x430px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 640x430px

>>17556547
>it's the "literally who" of all track racing.
That's because you don't follow racing at all.

>I don't understand where you got "LMP1 is dying"
Again, you don't follow motorsport so you wouldn't know that LMP1 had 8 teams and 6 constructors during the 2012 inaugural WEC season which was a stark contrast to the 3-4 teams since 2013.

>loads of different manufacturers have expressed interest in developing a car for the class.
Literally one boutique manufacturer and a small British engineering firm. They're basically having Dallara/BRE build the car for them.

>Is that why its viewer numbers are second to only Formula 1?
Not even an argument. You're actually agreeing with my point here.

>But no-one outside of the GT autism club gives a hoot about GT3s.
Spoken like somebody who doesn't watch motorsport at all. Most of the biggest races in the world feature GT3 category cars.

>There are no "high profile races" for GT3s.
You just said that the D24, N24, Sebring-12, Bathurst-12, and Spa-24 are not high profile races.

>>17555808
Lamborghini literally started making cars after Ferruccio whined to Ferrari that their clutches were crap and Enzo told him to keep driving tractors and stay away from sportscars. If that's not butthurt i don't know what is.

Depends on the car really
>countach,Diablo or murcielago
Doesn't matter which Ferrari you offer I'm taking one of these
>modern lambos
I'm taking the ferrari

>>17555808
Lamborghini have NEVER had a manufacturer team. Whenever Lamborghinis are raced, it's by third party teams, and not particularly successfully.

>>17556104
>I'm not a race car driver and never will

this, /o/ unironically believes they're going to use 100% of the Ferrari's capabilities. Yeah a ferrari is probably better around a track but I honestly don't give a shit. I want an Aventador.

Also Ferraris are ugly. So are Paganis. They just don't look good in my opinion

>>17556728
>Lamborghini have NEVER had a manufacturer team.
Since when did this matter?

>third party teams
The term you're looking for is "works" or "privateer." Besides, manufacturers have been doing it like that for decades now to which it's become the norm. If I recall correctly, Porsche is currently the only large automobile manufacturer racing in a major GT class with a true factory team. Every other "factory" team is a really just a works team.

There's about a dozen Ferraris I'd take any day over a Lambo, but I wouldn't turn my nose up at an Aventador.

>>17556681
>implying there is anything but the ADAC 24h at nords
No one gives a shit about GT racing. Its a feeder class into higher classes

Lambos are great
Ferraris are better

File: diablo.jpg (72KB, 580x387px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 580x387px

>>17550646
Ferrari genrally, but I will love the diablo until death

>>17550646
Farrari as cars in general, but i prefer the Lambos V12 sound and interiors.

>>17552212
McLaren can't even make its own F1 engine...

You know that meme where people are talking and then there is one person in a crab pose "screeching autistically"?
The autistic screacher is summed up by Lamborghini's history and attitude

Lamborghini.
If I would suddenly have lots of money, why not buy the outrageous poser car? The Ferrari might be a bit better on a track, but I'd want to use my money for something fun.

>>17550646
Lamborghini, at least they haven't gotten a handful of their race drivers killed in the past

>>17557194
Looks like a dog's dinner

>>17557190
And? Lamborghini has so little of an impact on racing that nobody cares about them. What's your point?

>>17555692
>my parents made alot of money and bought me a R8
>I feel no need to research because everything in life has been handed to me
>I should make a youtube channel about my car I know nothing about

Please stop shilling this retard

Mclaren is the only super car manufacturer today that I would buy from.

>>17556884
>Also Ferraris are ugly
those grapes were probably sour anyway

>>17550653
>produced basically nothing but gaudy boy's bedroom poster cars for the last 40 years
You realize grown ups just buy gt cars like the f12 or 812 superfast, right? Not everybody is an arab kid who lusts after their hypercars

File: ferrariff.jpg (290KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 1920x1080px

Lamborghini doesn't make a shooting brake so Ferrari wins this round

>>17557315
>Lambo
>the outrageous poser car
So, we do agree?

File: liz_mau_ferrari_chicago.jpg (225KB, 1242x1424px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 1242x1424px

>>17550646
>Lamborghini or Ferrari?

>>17557094
What would you know? Clearly your knowledge of motorsports is limited to things that have been memed endlessly by video games.

>>17558322
>muh sour grapes
If that was the case he'd call the Lambos ugly too wouldn't he? It's more a case of bad taste. Both Ferrari and Lamborghini are some of the cars with the most amazing design in existence.

>>17559547
>Ferrari and Lamborghini are some of the cars with the most amazing design in existence
Every door ding or scratch is expensive on those cars.

>>17550755
Nothing is wrong with that?

>>17554155
ever since the Murcielago, Lamborghinis have all looked the same, with the exception of the Veneno, which was actually original for a change

>>17559834
so?

File: Vectorwx801.jpg (161KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1024x768px

>>17555864
I still believe

>>17560117
It does kind of suck.
You wind up almost never parking.

>>17558322
It's not a meme my dude, I just genuinely don't like the look of modern ferraris. I know everyone else does but I don't. I like Lambos and Porsches in terms of the best looking cars. The new 812 is decent looking, if I was in the market to buy a ferrari, which I'm obviously not, that's probably what I'd get. Idk why, I just don't really like the look of them. Some of the older ferraris dont look bad, but for some reason the look of them just doesn't do it for me. Also I don't like the company.

>>17560189
I saw an Aventador parked outside of a Panera last month. It was pretty neat.

>>17560356
>don't like the look of modern ferraris
>modern
Moving the goalposts now.

>Aventador parked outside of a Panera last month
Yeah, I was in that thread too.

File: IMG_5993.jpg (102KB, 608x811px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 608x811px

>>17560388
>Yeah, I was in that thread too.
No, you weren't actually because I saw it in person. Is that really such a hard thing to imagine? Do you literally never leave your house?

>Moving the goalposts now.

>explaining what I mean is now moving the goal posts
>also there has been literally no change whatsoever between 1940 and 2017 so clearly all Ferraris look the same

>>17555635
>Pagani which are truly pieces of art

Art no, exercises in unfettered excess is more like it.

File: victorhortastaircase.jpg (223KB, 808x1024px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 808x1024px

>>17560533
Sometimes art is just that.

>>17560470
>No, you weren't actually because I saw it in person
Holy shit, think for a second.
You posted about it in another thread, genius.

>explaining what I mean is now moving the goal posts
No, first you posted "Ferraris are ugly", making no distinction whatsoever. Then you amended it to "modern Ferraris".
That's pretty much the definition of moving the goalposts, as your statement's object has changed.

>>17560533
>implying that's a bad thing

I bet brutalism is your favourite genre of architecture too

Ferrari and Lamborghini both sell cars to disgustingly rich cunts who made their money fleecing other people/being sandnigger oil sheiks/singing pre-written and heavily autotuned ''''music''' or prancing around on TV.

The difference is that Ferrari has this snooty MUH HERITAGE attitude as though they are somehow the better company. Lamborghini considers owners of their tractors to be 'Lamborghini owners' just like people who own Diablos.

>>17561485
The tractors cost more.

>>17561485
>Ferrari and Lamborghini both sell cars to disgustingly rich cunts who made their money fleecing other people/being sandnigger oil sheiks/singing pre-written and heavily autotuned ''''music''' or prancing around on TV.
You sound jelly as fuck

>>17561539
post your supercar

>>17561562
Still jelly lmao

>>17561574
nothing worse than bootlicking poorfags

>>17561576
Porsche owners are worse

>>17561576
truth hurts, huh?

>>17561592
almost as much as it must hurt you to have to get on that bus every morning

>>17561606
>projecting this much

>>17561485
you do sound jelly as fuck.
why don't you just buy a scale model ?
you could jerk off to it and everything.

>>17561485
>rich cunts who made their money fleecing other people
This doesn't sound like a very fair description of what I do.
Well, stupid people, maybe.

>>17560189
well, then you can't afford them

>>17560628
not him but the conversation was obviously about buying new

>>17561741
>can't afford them
Not at all.
You just don't use it for errands, or shit like that.
Driving killer roads doesn't require parking.

>>17561510
are you for real?

>>17561748
>the conversation was obviously about buying new
I don't see anywhere where anyone has said that.
It's not like the majority of buyers of these cars buy them new.

>>17561539
>>17561574
>>17561584
>>17561592
>>17561611
and so on, wonderful, look at all the (you)s my hard work has enriched me with, sorry about that idiot that actually tried to argue with supercar fanboys lmao

>>17561702
I don't actually want one, i'd go for either something like a Caterham (for the driving) or a sick Merc AMG wagon or CTS-V wagon for showing off my fiatbucks while being able to haul friends and stuff around. would rather spend 250k on a sick boat to bang broads on.

>>17561713
a small minority of supercar buyers are moderately wealthy people who just really want a fast car, there's a guy who started his own trucking company near me and went from one guy and one truck to a fleet, big office building and he's got a 918, Huracan and a couple of high-end German sedans in his garage now. He and you are not the people that keep Ferrari in the black tho.

>>17560130
are those supra headlights?

>>17561763
>It's not like the majority of buyers of these cars buy them new.
I don't see the majority of any car buyers buying new. After all, someone has to buy the second hand ones.

>>17561584
do you mean 911 owners? they are pretty terrible
>hurr Porsche greatest brand
>yes i agree, i am thinking about buying a used Cayman-
>nO ONLY 911 EVERY OTHER PORSCHE A SHIT U RETARTED U POOR CAYMAN MORE LIKE GAY MAN LOLOLOL

>>17561775
>He and you are not the people that keep Ferrari in the black
lol, the dealerships blew me off anyway, so I wound up buying from a private seller. Although he was the original owner, so I guess they got his dough.

>>17561866
Well, buying used Ferraris also helps them tbqh. They wouldn't be worth as much if they had no resale value.

>>17561866
dead srs here: congrats on the Ferrari, hope you enjoy it.

>>17561866
are you the 360 guy?

>>17561880
Can't argue with that.

>>17561959
Thx. 4000 miles so far, no tickets yet.

>>17561983
You know it's a small community when knowing someone's manufacturer means knowing their model.

>>17562054
>You know it's a small community when knowing someone's manufacturer means knowing their model.
Well, I was in the thread when you posted it, and the average guy in /o/ is a poorfag. IDK if anyone else has a Ferrari here.

File: 1438286034034.jpg (57KB, 639x960px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 639x960px

>>17555836

>>17553625
god is there anybody more insufferable than viperfags

>>17562111
>IDK if anyone else has a Ferrari here
I talked with a guy here who has a Mondial.
That's about it, though.

>>17562173
the Mondial gets a lot of shit but I'd have one if I could tbqh
you could do a lot worse than driving a V12 these days

>>17562173
Also, do you think that being a Ferrari owner now would enable you to get a brand new one if you could afford it? I've always wondered that.

>>17562206
>V12
jesus christ I'm a retard
they sound as good as a V12 tho :^)
posting some Al Pacino in Italian just because I can
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0rPbwN0gbA

>>17562224
Shit, I never knew the car in that scene was a Mondial.

>>17562210
It might get you a small amount of pull, but it really just depends on availability.
Most of the supercars are pre-reserved for the most valued clients (billionaire types). Buying a GT is probably difficult without paying a significant increase over sticker (as production tends to be around 3,000 or so), while a mid-engine V8 will require less over sticker.

>>17562339
>Buying a GT is probably difficult without paying a significant increase over sticker (as production tends to be around 3,000 or so), while a mid-engine V8 will require less over sticker.
interesting, I never thought reverse bargaining was a thing but it makes sense due to scarcity.

>>17562512
I guess if you've got enough people who'll reliably buy your newest models, you can demand a premium from those who won't.

>>17550796
You know your formatting

>>17562723
oh, you mean previous owners pay sticker?

File: maxresdefault (2).jpg (264KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 1920x1080px

>>17555775
For a company to even worry about a one-off car ruining their reputation is hilarious and ridiculous, and should be mocked as such.

He should have done his next car with fur like the dumb & dumber car and called it furrari, just to spite them.

File: hqdefault.jpg (49KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 480x360px

>>17562810

>>17562810
it's not about ruining the reputation
if you let people use your brand liberally and don't act on it your trademark rights are at a stake. Not taking action is what leads to brands genericizing. Ferrari's most valued possession is their brand, even more so than their know how.

>>17562848
hhnnngggg

>>17561799
Yes, they are.

File: Vector_W2_Twin_Turbo_1985-86_07.jpg (68KB, 1024x420px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 1024x420px

>>17560130
Someday the future will catch up to the past.

>>17550661
14 year old detected

File: 1480292056232.jpg (827KB, 1980x828px) Image search: [Google]

827KB, 1980x828px

>>17550646
Ferrari

>>17562780
Not always.
If you've bought new models from them in the past, they may give you the opportunity to buy them in the future, but it isn't black and white.
Basically, they've got enough wealthy clientele to buy up most of their (artificially limited) stock. That's why displacing a guaranteed buyer requires a premium over sticker.

Thanks to the types I've seen owning them, I've grown to associate Lambos as the choice cars for melanin-enriched people as well as the types that are colonizing the entire fucking planet right now as "poor refugees" yet always somehow have the money to buy this shit.

So.......Ferrari. I know modern Ferraris associate with stupid spoiled sluts like the Kardashians and Hiltons, but at least I don't feel like I'd have to apologize for owning one.

>>17555367
>FCA is the master race.

Please. Not once in their entire history did they ever build a halfway-reliable engine until they took over Chryser and got their ghands on Chrysler engineers used to making cars that'll run 100k miles on the odo. And even then their reliability is still a question-mark on most of their cars.


The Gallardo may be a car that'll get you pulled over by cops thinking you're a rapper or basketball player, but among the supercars it's easily the most reliable.

>>17550661
It farts and kicks-back all over the place as it really doesn't like going slow.

>>17553584

Dealers can't even give those things away now because once the twin-hyper-megatron-charged engines get a few thousand miles on them they quickly become high-maintenance money-pit cars.

>>17550653
I thought this had more to do with the fact that Ferrari doesn't let you buy a new car from them unless you already owned them historically.

>>17550760
>4channer

anyone who uses that word and actively tells people they are one should really be the victims of the first real holocaust

>>17565011
Let's say you run an auto manufacturer that has huge demand due to your small supply. There are hundreds of wealthy people who have told you that they will buy your new models whenever they come out, and they do, every time.
With most (all, in some cases) of your supply already spoken for/sold, would you effectively trade a proven buyer on your list for an unknown customer, even if they had the money for the listed price?

>>17565011
Anyone can buy a new Ferrari --- or at least their "interpretation" of new after the factory breaks it in for you then the eternal-shitbag dealers always have to play with the customer's new toys first before handing them over.


You just can't buy the special cars (Enzo, Laferrari, 458 Aperta, F12 TDF, etc) unless you're on the repeat-customer list.

>>17565068
Half of all "new" Ferrari buyers (or what's interpreted as "new") WILL flip the car within one year ow owning it. That's why there's always a steady stream of current-year Ferraris out there with less than 500 miles on each.

In fact my local dealer recently moved a new California with 50 miles on it. It shipped with 45 from Italy, the guy who bought it two years ago and spent waiting got pissed off at waiting an additional week after it shipped before the dealer handed it over while the dealer took it for a shot joy-ride where the guy who was waiting for it saw him playing with his new toy, and got his money back.

Plus car-flippers. There's no shortage of them cashing in on people who want a Ferrari/Lambo/Mclaren/Bentley/etc NOW as opposed to getting on that wait list for their cars to be built. Their impatience raises the prices of barely-used high-end cars.

is project cars 2 the new crysis? i can barely run it on minimum requirments.

Do you guys think it asks too much? or its correct