Static or bags. Thoughts?

Hard drops are for poor niggers that can't afford to do a proper job. There's literally no advantage whatsoever to hard drops expect it's cheap. Bags are superior in every single category. Only downside is space for the tank but whatever.

>>17523850
get this stance shit off of my board

File: bagged dual flames.jpg (937KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

937KB, 1600x1200px

bagged dualies make my pants tight

>>17524083
Would look better if the roof was cut down too.

Mines bagged and rides a little rough going to switch it to shocks

File: Bagged '69 Suburban.jpg (36KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 640x480px

just sothing cool about huge trucks bagged and sitting on the floor

>>17524086
yeah maybe but head room is nice
also it can't be cheap to get the body ad all 4 doors chopped down then new glass cut to fit

>>17524099
Very good points.

File: IMG_2405.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>17524083
This new dually is nice.
I spend a lot of time going to truck shows.

File: Gttagofast.jpg (857KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

857KB, 1440x2560px

My semen demon 700hp bagged whip

>>17524552
>Hurrrrrr cops harassing me hurrrrrrrrrrrrrr

>>17524552
Bagged? Does she lay frame!

>>17524603
Fuck you pig I'll fuck your daughter and do skids all over your driveway cunt
>>17524608
Nah its my daily also but she's low

File: DD040F92-DC6A-4388-85F5-DD1423BED157.jpg (356KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 768x1024px

>>17524099
THAT FUCKING BURB HNGGG
I fucking love 2nd gen Suburbans enough already but bagged that thing is pure sex

P.s. I'm glad I'm not the only one on /o/ who loves low trucks. I plan on buying and static dropping a Datsun pickup super low in the very near future
t. lifted truck driver with a small penis

>>17523850
> ITT: Dirty Spics
Lowered trucks are legitimate cancer

>>17525186
Why?
inb4 because they're impractical

If it's 2WD and bagged you remove nearly no practicality. Hell you might even add practicality with being able to level according to load etc etc. Even if it isn't practical, why are you on an enthusiasts board if all you care about is practicality, and don't care about just a little bit of cool and badass? Smh. I'm making an assumption here but that shit pisses me off man

How is bagged not regarded as cheating?
>Ride normal all day long
>Park
>Deflate the bags
>OMG it's slammed! So cool!

No it's not, because it's never like that when it's driving.

>>17525212
I see plenty of people running them 2 inches or so off the ground or even dragging frame. If you have the air all the way out usually the frame is on the ground and it pulls the front wheels off the ground a little also. You'd be a yard to run it at flat out.

File: CCF6B827-E6C2-49AB-A629-6D71937342BB-1097-0000010154274705.jpg (64KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 640x480px

>>17525162
Datsun! Yes! All the import mini trucks of that vintage look so good laid out. I'd like to have a little Mitsubishi truck.

>>17524798
Looks slick, bro.

>>17525202
> Littlr bit cool and badass
Except it looks super fucking retarded. You've taken something and made it totally opposite if what it was inteded for, whilst also spending a shit load of money to make it far worse. Unpracticality isn't the start of it, only the biggest flaw. You're literally spending EXTRA money to make something more shit. Only people that like it are nasty Spics, or special snowflakes. If its so cool why don't people actually drive their trucks at maximum low? Because it's literally retarded. I mean you can go ahead like what you like, but I'm just giving you my well thought out opinion, to me it's the dumbest shit ever

>>17525347
Thanks pretty much one of the fastest trucks in the city can't go down the street without some faggot in his stang wanting to get rekt

>>17525376
>(you)

>>17525386
YouTube: $80,000 can crusher.

>>17525376
Because max low isn't practical. An inch or 2 off the ground is good. And when they are on bags, they can get almost back up to factory height. Depending on how much travel you have.

>>17525387
Haha people never suspect the trucks. That's why I like them also. What you got for boost?

File: IMG_2574.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

>>17525386

>>17525186
You do know a properly lowered truck can still tow and handle a payload, right?

Then again, you're a GM sperg so outside of fucking your cousin, your knowledge isn't exactly useful here.

>>17523850
If you do any of that to a 4x4, you're a retard. To a 4x2? You have bad taste.

ITT retards who've been granted a bigger bank loan than they can responsibly handle

Completely pointless. With stanced cars you can at least make the argument that camber CAN increase performance. Most are way over the top, though. With lowered trucks, there's literally no reason.

File: Speed_Bump_Bacalar.jpg (49KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 500x333px

>>17525386
*blocks your path*

>buy a truck
>drop it
>still handles like a truck, except
>can't take it off road
>can't put anything of any weight in the bed
You sure did a good job kiddo.

>>17527991
>Ride quality can be significantly increased
>Payload and towing doesn't change

Doesn't fair well off-road though

>>17523850
It ruins a perfectly good vehicle by giving it nigger-tier aesthetics and handling characteristics

>>17525386
>>17525425
>>17525455
What is: slightly uneven terrain

Fuck off stance-cucks

>>17528008
>Payload and towing doesn't change

If you have 2" of ground clearance and you put something heavy in the bed, you're going to scrape.

>>17523850
Makes a useless truck even more useless

File: k.jpg (116KB, 700x525px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 700x525px

>>17527679
>>17528111
*shrugs and keeps things moving*

>>17524552
t. cholo mexican

File: mexitruck.jpg (354KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

354KB, 1024x768px

>>17528784
naa, this is a mexican