How good was the C4 ZR1, Could it turn with few simple mods?
>>17520222
>Could the car 3 seconds faster than a 964 turbo turn?
If it couldn't then i guess 911s before the 993 couldn't turn either.
>>17520237
I don't know much about them aside from having a great engine back in 1991. They seem to be attainable in price
>>17520222
Engine designed by Lotus but that's really the only catch
A base C4 has more potential for (cheaper) mods with its stock LT1, the purpose of buying a C4 ZR1 would be for the novelty. Until GM jumps to the OHC bandwagon, their few OHC cars will never be cheap to mod
>>17520247
What mods would you do to an LT1 just bolt ons? Would you even make same power, I'd like to believe the suspension is much better too but technology has advanced so you could get much better nowadays I guess
>>17520245
They suffer from typical C4 faults like electronics. other than that its a car that feels very fucking powerful even to this day.
>>17520247
Engine was built by Murcury Marine so no need expect engine reliability similar to other lotus.
>>17520222
Brakes and steering are Lotus designed, I wouldn't fuck with it personally.
google is still racist
>>17520222
What makes you think a C4 can't corner? Have you seen the size of the tires on a C4 ZR1? They have grip for days. Hell, the tires, suspension and brakes from the ZR1 went to the 96 Grand Sport, hailed as one of the best handling Vettes of all time
>>17520623
>leaf springs
>>17520638
Epic meme. Truly, epic.