New Mustang

File: cucked.jpg (147KB, 1213x827px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1213x827px

I hope they put those lines there so when it runs into a crowd of people it just kills them fast and ends their misery

>>17519132
It didn't need a face lift. it needs to take down the Comaro.

>>17519132
It's starting to look more and more like some generic European car

>>17519132
hate this trend of angry headlights to try and be aggressive

2010-2014 mustangs were the best looking of the three at the time. turned to shit after

>>17519164
Engine is updated to dual injection and 12:1 compression, 7500RPM redline. Magnetic ride is standard. Both auto and manual transmissions are new. I doubt this is all enough to beat the Camaro, but it's something.

>>17519203
Cool. still waiting on that new platform Ford is supposedly sinking billions of dollars in for a new Mustang and new Flagship for Lincoln.

>>17519209
>billions

Better be for more cars than those two unless you want a discontinued Mustang because that's how you get discontinued Mustangs.

>>17519132
Looks like a mix between a down syndrome and a Jag

File: New-Ford-Mustang-V8-GT-with-Performace-Pack-in-Orange-Fury-3-640x360.jpg (46KB, 640x360px)

46KB, 640x360px

The Perf Pack spoiler is kind of shit looking. Doesn't look functionally aerodynamic enough.

>Mustang ((( GT )))

>>17519132
I think they made the front too noisy. The grille is big and bold but then the lower half tries to go sleek. The headlights remind me of the first Audi TT. I give it a resounding "meh". So glad I didn't wait to pick up my GT.

>>17519203
i wonder what a 5 liter engine with these additions can make. we have 435/400 now. Im guessing they will try to equal or slightly beat the camaro so im guessing. 460/430. i dont think they will get the torque above a camaro because MUH displacement advantage

>>17519209

any chance the new one is going to be lighter and smaller?

the size of the original mustang or camaro was just perfect

>>17519164
This so fucking much. The 2015-16 looked great.

>>17519393
The original 65 was Miata sized, no way in hell. Best I can reasonably hope for is going back to the SN-95 size and weight.

>>17519389
Ford will sell you a two different power packs for the 5.0L that increases it to 457hp/424trq or 472hp/405trq (powerband vs top end) and those come with a 3 year powertrain warranty. 460hp is totally reasonable with the engine updates, it's a pretty advanced engine.

File: 1497025906356.gif (1MB, 300x169px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 300x169px

>>17519428

>1975

181.6" L x 62.2" W / 108 in wheel base

2017

188″ L x 75″ W / 107.1 in wheelbase

>mfw original mustang had a longer wheelbase while being about 7 inches shorter in length than the newer one

>>17519132
The squashed front end makes it look like a Malibu.

>>17519453
>>17519428

new miata is 154″ L x 68″ W btw, almost 30in shorter than the original mustang

>>17519453
>181.6" L x 62.2" W

woops, it's 68.2 in wide, not 62

>>17519203
Impressive

>>17519428
The 525 horsepower gt350 loses to a base model 450hp Camaro SS.
Those LT1s make brutal power across the entire power band.
The 5.0l only make good power at the top 90% of their RPM range.

>>17519132
pig fat like most of its owners

>>17519453
overhang was a mistake

>>17520796
O B E S S E D

>>17519132
Looks like a retarded XK-R.

>>17519203
Ford still can't beat the camaro? Is this a joke?

>>17519370
Agreed. It's like most cars these days with little wrinkles and pointless angles. It's like a symmetrical scribble.

Call me when the S650 comes out and loses *at least* 200 pounds

>>17521730
I'm so sick of your faggot lingo. What car is the s650 nerd

>>17519132
Is it fucking lighter already? It's crazy that mustangs are near 3900lbs

>>17521772
No, still weighs the same and still slower than the 2 year old camaro ss

>>17519132
But did they put it on a diet?

File: 2019 mustang.jpg (1MB, 2030x1040px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2030x1040px

>>17519132
i like the modern 2019 model more

>>17519132
Holy shit downmarket cars are ugly
Who had the bright idea to bring back the chrome "corral" grill

>>17521766
Chassis codes
1994-2004 was SN95
2005-2014 was SN197
2015-2022 is S550
2023 will be the S650

Though Ford is thinking of moving the next gen a couple years closer, probably because they don't like being utterly dominated by the Camaro in every performance metric.

this is the Mustang II: Part Deux

>>17519203
I can't believe this is a car board and nobody has called you out on your bullshit yet
>Magnetic ride is standard.
No, it's available. Available =/= standard epsecially when it costs as much as it will
>Both auto and manual transmissions are new
The auto is new. The manual is an "updated" MT82 which is the same trans

File: ford a shit.jpg (96KB, 493x607px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 493x607px

>>17521601
no

>>17521968

Kek

>>17522055
That's the GT350, not the GT350R.
Not like it would matter, because ford would still be btfo though

>>17522055
I'm talking GT and SS

>>17522071
A V6 Camaro BTFO's the Mustang GT.

7500 rpm v8 with high rpm power band. It's like ford picked up where Honda left off. How can you hate this modern s2000

>>17522105
I agree. That's my point. Ford is trash

>>17522125
Because it's still slower than the 2016 camaro ss. They should of beat it but didnt. The improvements they mentioned will likely not be enough to match let alone beat the camaro unless the car lost like 300 pounds which they would of announced if it did

>>17522125
The Coyote is like two built K24's sharing a crank. The cam phasing even feels like VTEC kicking in.

>>17522192
We should all be driving gtr then, since it's faster.

>>17522125
Because it's pigfat

>>17519174
this. It looks like a Mercedes. It doesn't look bad at all, but the Mustang is an American car, not an European car and they should remember it.

>>17522226
The Huracan is faster than a GTR, why aren't we driving that instead?

>>17522255
I can afford a GTR, I can't afford a Huracan

>>17522267
Sucks to be poor I guess. I just took a shit in my gold toilet.

>>17522274
The argument isn't "hurt durr more expensive model is better" the argument is camaro SS and mustang GT on suppose to be on par with each beating the other when a new model comes out. Ford's new model is our and it still loses

>>17522287
I want to like camaro but I just can't get over the interior. I wish GM stop trying too hard with tiny window shit

>>17522294
It's really not that bad, you will only understand it by driving it. I hate GM cause of their dealers. Niggers try to get me to pay tax twice and pay for stuff they said they would throw in for free since they fucked up my first car order. Telling me i cant regester the car in another state i have a house cause my license is new york. You dont need a license to buy a car

>>17519132
The old one looks better. This one has down syndrome. They didn't need to change the way it looks

>>17522337
When I worked at dealerships we didn't sell car without driver license. But shady small used car lots did. Not sure how ...

>>17522499
Why? It's not illegal

File: 2018-Aston-Martin-Vanquish-S-Vanquish-Volante-front-three-quarter.jpg.cf.jpg (29KB, 602x399px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 602x399px

>>17519174
Ford still owns like 30% of Aston Martin.
Notice anything?

>>17524306
They own less than 10%.

>>17519132
not crazy about the triangular brake vents but otherwise i like it.

>>17522252
So American cars are forever defined by shitty lumbering boxes designed by cavemen for cavemen?

File: Ford-XR8-Sprint-102.jpg (175KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1024x683px

>>17519132
It looks like they took the front off the xr6 / xr8

>>17519453
>1975
>original mustang
No.

Of course, This is the phase Ford hasn't tried yet in the mustang lineup. The one where they base the philosophy on the horse itself.. as long as it had Downs Syndrome

>>17519209
F A L C O N

File: 1499915806071.png (173KB, 308x326px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 308x326px

>>17519132

I don't want to make a new thread so I'll ask here.
Do you guys think buying a 05-09 V6 Mustang is worth it, or should I save up for a V8?

>>17524306

Yes, looks like a Ford ST

>>17525435
this

>>17522005
>Not wanting a v8 focus

File: 0 whoahoahs internally.jpg (98KB, 544x626px)

98KB, 544x626px

>>17525424
>tfw no Barra turbo mustang

Meh. Still won't keep up with the camaro

>>17525761
Save for a v8

The performance you get with a camaro is great, I just can't stand how they look and the visibility leaves a lot to be desired. If those two things were fixed I might have actually bought a zl1.

>>17522053
Different poster here, but show me where they confirm its an MT82?

One of the engineers gets interviewed beside a red one, (cant remember but its on youtube), and says it gets a twin disc clutch and hints that the transmission (6 speed manual in this case) gets two overdrives.

Us car guys assume it'll be a tremec, cause the mt82 has 5th as one to one and only 1 technical overdrive, 6th.

Whereas all the tremecs, like t45, t3650, t56, tr6060,and so on, use 4th as a one to one gear, and have two overdrives.

File: images.png (6KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 225x225px

>>17519132
Its face looks dumb

>>17525378
yes