>name something you love and hate about each

I like that they all have great designs and performance.
I hate that they are all overpriced.

File: 1499322824217.jpg (59KB, 586x515px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 586x515px

>GM
>Comparable to AMG or BMW

File: IMG_20170709_120521~2.jpg (2MB, 3439x1632px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3439x1632px

No coupe or Wagon CTS-V now

>AMG
Good : True luxury euromuscle
Bad : Seem to twin turbo V8s and V12s whilst only making little to no gains over a naturally aspirated V8 for some bizarre reason.

>Caddilac V
Good : Fast and engaging.
Bad : Not true luxury, too gaudy and insincere, more like Acura tier, not like M-B or Jag etc.

>M
Good : Best of the three, M2, 1M
Bad : X6M/X5M makes me want to destroy my eyes when I see them

>>17509899
>AMG
Love: V8s, something ferd is too numale for.
Hate: maintenance
>V
Love: god-tier driving dynamics, superb engineered platforms like the Alpha and Omega. Omega especially since its so light for its physical presence.
Hate: infotainment, fingerprint magnet gloss and gauge cluster on ATS.
>BMW
Love: one of the few manufacturers to still be making straight sixes for performance cars. watercooled stuff in the engine of the M4 GTS is cool.
Hate: Camaro overshadows the "ultimate driving machine" aspect of them and makes it seem like a meme. BMW has been shown to have the highest maintenance of almost any
mainstream brand.

>>17509925
fuck off with this wagon meme. it only makes the car uglier and slower

File: IMG_20170709_091024~2.jpg (2MB, 4015x1977px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4015x1977px

>>17509959
But the wagon had the fastest track times because the extra weight improves weight distribution and traction

>>17509967
Source? I am smelling bs, but if it's really true I will apologize anon

>AMG

Good: most luxurious

Bad: maintenance, cost

>M

Good: tons of moels

Bad: they stick the M logo on EVERYTHING

>V

Good: Best driving dynamics and fastest of the 3

Bad: too little models, and the XT5 and CT6 aren't getting the V treatment

>>17509981
>XT5
>crossover
>giving a crossover the performance treatment

File: 01-mercedes-benz-vehicles-mercedes-amg-gle-63-s-4matic-coupe-c-292-2560x872-1280x436.jpg (90KB, 1280x436px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1280x436px

>>17509988
like M and AMG don't

>>17509949
X6M and X5M are the fastest SUV's on the planet though
faster on track than the M3

>>17509997

I can understand that but they 2uggo4me

>>17509981
the ats v is slower than the competing m3/M4 though

>>17509995

That's an SUV or SAV (Sports Activity Vehicle) not a crossover.

File: 2017-07-10_09.22.57.jpg (751KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

751KB, 1080x1920px

>>17509978

>>17510026
>top gear
>with a living meme at the wheel

Lol

>>17510437
Still doesn't disprove what he's saying

File: R.jpg (28KB, 660x396px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 660x396px

>AMG

blacks

>M

Mexicans

>V

GM

>>17511009
What the hell is that?

>>17511131
Jaguar

>>17509899
>AMG
God-tier sound, shitty engineering
>Caddy
Looks pretty, but too heavy and not as "luxury" as the others
>M
Nice metrics on the track, but fuck their jew-tier pricing

>>17509899
SRT>all of the above

>>17509899
>AMG
They've done very well with their v8's, very smooth driving.

I hate that they're so heavy and I don't like the interiors.

>Cadillac V

I mean, they're trying at least. The build quality isn't anywhere close to merc/bmw and their marketing is practically nonexistent

>BMW M

The best looking aside from amg's halo cars. Best handling, driving dynamics and consistently fast. Still doing great things with the inline 6 (M2, M4).

When it comes to V8's they're still ironing out issues, no more naturally aspirated engines, some cars are stupidly overpriced

File: IMG_20170709_114119.jpg (3MB, 4640x2610px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4640x2610px

What exactly is Cadillac missing to get europoor fanboy approval? I got to test drive the new ATS-V and CTS-V yesterday along with some others. Some autist told the Cadillac representatives that it was great and all but he likes AMG and M more, the representatives just said they heard this last generation, the CTS-V went through a complete redesign and you can't make everyone happy.

>>17509899
>///M
Dropped the ball this generation. Only the M2 is worthy while everything else above it is BMW cucking their customers.

>/////AMG
Their engines have always been impressive and it's the only one of the mentioned marques that has a true sportscar in their lineup. Although the badge has become so prolific that it's basically just another trim level for each car. It's good since you can get an sedans, coupes, and SUVs large and small, but it sort of dilutes the brand. Styling is also a hit against it.

>V//
Good performance and nice styling inside and out, but the downside is that we only have the two models to base this off of. Your only choices are the large CTS sedan or the smaller ATS. It'd be interesting to see them start a new-generation XLR or give the Escalade the performance treatment just so they can offer some variety.

>>17509899
amg
unreliable overpriced shitbox
v
perfection
m
unreliable overpiced shitbox

>>17511299
I hate dodge with a passion but SRT is pretty solid. It's almost a shame they have people at that skill level working for Dodge.

>>17509899
>German
>American but at least trying compared to the other amerishart brands.
>Also German

All my favorite things are German. The the only American brand at least trying to learn how to in2luxury is Cadaladadingdong.

>>17509899

AMG
Love: sound
Hate: fat, the new 4 cylinder one

V
Love: CTS-V 6MT sedan and wagon
Hate: Everything else

M
Love: Old M
Hate: The "M package" badges on fucking EVERYTHING, everything M car post E92, the way the current M3/4 sounds

File: Audi-RS-5-BMW-M3-Mercedes-C-63-AMG-1200x800-2f701316013dccaa[1].jpg (301KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 1200x800px

>>17509899

>V shit or just Caddy V
>Delusional OP thinks they are equal to AMG, M, and RS/quattro.

muh side

>>17509917

Dis

picrelated: True Teutonic Triumvirate

>>17511926
Dodge is my favorite car maker. I know that they're garbage and hate people who like them though.

>>17509899
>ayymg
i dont care if this is the best line of cars ever made in history (they arent), i hope every employee past present and future of mercedes gets raped by migrants for fucking up usa import laws
>v flag
the sc v8 manual luxobarge/wagon was absolutely fucking tits and they got rid of it for fucking v6 turbos. also no sixteen. i always liked the coat of arms on their older hood ornaments.
>slashslashslash m
used to be the ultimate driving machine, but now its just another selloutmobile badge they overcharge for that cant outdo a fucking $40k camaro

>>17511926
>It's almost a shame they have people at that skill level working for Dodge
I might be wrong about this, but didn't the SRT guys teach Mercedes engineers something? It could have been just shitpost I saw.

File: IMG_20170709_091105~2.jpg (2MB, 3631x1973px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3631x1973px

>>17512297
The third gen CTS-V is a 640hp sc V8. Auto only now though. The ATS-V has the v6 twin turbo.

>>17512331
On Jay Lenos Garage a SRT employee said they had to teach Mercedes engineers burnouts and having fun. Mercedes owned Chrysler from the 90's to 2007 so there was a lot of joint efforts.

File: GM performance 2017 edition.png (2MB, 628x2104px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 628x2104px

>AMG
Love: Amazing machines.
Hate: Where is my A63?
>M
Love: Sport, fun machines
Hate: Why 4WD?
>V
Love: lolwut... I mean, who want to drive a unreliable, overpriced chevy niggermobile?
Hate: German-wannabe. Caddy needs to go back to its original root, a big old slow yatchland

I don't see V belonging to the group where has AMG, M, and quattro or RS.

>>17512401
>Pay for ceramic disc package
>Only get two

>>17512455

>triggered poorfag

>>17512284
>audi
>bmw
>mb
>teutonic

Are you retarded or just ignorant?

>>17512369
>Auto only now though
even more disgusting

>>17512516

>newfag
>what is teuton

>>17509899
AMG:
Nothing. Kaisershit meme car for gold chain wearing eastern eurotards who want to pull high priced escorts or pretend they're in the mob. V-6/8/12 engine is nice tho, comfortably sits at higher mph.

Caddy: The last real bastion of american luxury brands, nice interior, insanely powerful engine, although from what i hear the headliner inside isn't all that luxurious....but who cares? And those wagons... holy shit. >inb4 nignogmobile when was the last time you saw a hood rat in a v series?

M series: for trust fund chads, spoiled rich girls with daddy's money, and wagecucks trying too hard. nothing redeemable.

>>17510449
b-but he used the word 'meme'. Doesn't that mean he automatically wins?

>>17509899
>Super fast but it's gonna have electrical issues
>Upscaled shit GM vehicle
>Used to be an great enthusiast thing but it's shit now.

>>17512284
>delusional auditard thinks RS/quatro is on the same level as AMG or M
loooooooooooooooool

File: w.png (915KB, 1280x693px) Image search: [Google]

915KB, 1280x693px

>>17512723
actually, its mercedes and bmw which are not at the level of audi

>>17512746
>literally one good car in the last 20 years
kek

File: 1496128378300.jpg (78KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1280x720px

>>17512751
compared to literally 0 good cars from bmw and MB in the last 20 years?
kek

>>17512764
Now the auditard is spinning his wheels cuz he's mad, so much for quattro

File: BMW-M8-PRE-PRODUCTION-26[1].jpg (541KB, 1600x1068px) Image search: [Google]

541KB, 1600x1068px

>>17512746

Unless, you dont see i8 as a supercar. That's ur opinion.

Supercar:
Audi: R8
MB: AMG GT
BMW: i8 or M8 that will be revealed soon
Caddy: they can't into supercar.

>>17512798
>MB: AMG GT
I thought this, like the 911 was a "GT" (Grand Tour) car?
>BMW: i8
Does it just have to be mid-engine to be a "super car"?

>>17512798
>literally a prius
>a supercar

lol, the GT is only a recent car, and the SLS was a mere GT

>>17512779
nice, keep sperging

stay BTFO

File: Screenshot_20170710-172227.png (222KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 1080x1920px

>>17512798
Are you a 12 year old mudskin by any chance?
You consider the i8 a supercar when it's an awful car all around
If caddy wanted to make a supercar they could

Lap is lagune seca. Remember the caddy is a two ton behemoth luxobarge

File: IMG_0924.jpg (66KB, 548x365px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 548x365px

>>17512764
>anime image
>retarded, objectively false statement

File: 1497329507287.png (301KB, 468x494px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 468x494px

>>17512898
>objectvely false

prove it then

>>17512881
assmad GM fangirl detected

>>17512910
You're making the claim, you prove to me by reasonable metrics how bmw or merc haven't made a good car in 20 years, retard

File: 1496597643509.png (243KB, 449x426px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 449x426px

>>17512913
easy, just check their lineup during the last 20 years, not a single good car

perhaps the only car worthy of note is the new m6 4 door coupe whatever

pro: they are fast cars

con: it doesn't matter if it's the AMGxlesuperultra model, someone pulls up in the cheapest bentley and BTFO any benz

>>17512931
>perhaps the only car worthy of note is the new m6 4 door coupe whatever

previous gen m6 was better, boom proven wrong

>>17512940
>5,500 lb luxobarge
>btfoing anyone

Nah dude

>>17512945
>bangle m6
>good

come on now

File: maxresdefault.jpg (215KB, 1600x1060px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 1600x1060px

>>17510010

>>17512947
6.75 litre V8 Twin Turbo or 6 litre W12.. pick one