Thoughts on the Giulia? The four-banger, not the Quadrifoglio.

>for Euros
nice family car i guess, comfy, don't know about insurance costs
>for Norte Americanos
paying Mercedes prices for Chrysler quality, severe lack of dealerships/qualified mechanics, performance no better than any other 4-cylinder sedan that size

>>17500603
Gorgeous inside and out. I sat in one the other day at a dealership.

The good (from my experience)
>Looks great
>Feels well built on the interior

The bad
>Made by FUCKING FCA. This thing will probably explode in your driveway.
>That's it.

>>17500635
>memes

Lightest car, trashes the opponents with comparable engine powers and is comfy yet the most entertaining to drive: superb steering.

>Chrysler quality

In your dreams.

The Giulia uses better plastics and panels than the 3 series (both manufactured by faurecia), has a proper elegant LCD screen that is not glued on the dash like a third world car.

You can have Poltrona Frau interior leather, which is sublime and equips Maserati and Ferrari cars

IMO it looks amazing and is a great off-color pick for someone looking to be edgy and get an unconventional sports sedan but

>high stressed 4 banger
>fca quality
>italian brand

kek

>>17503210
Yes look at the 1.4 tjet on abarth and Giulietta quadrifoglio, pushing over 200 hp up to 300 hp being absolutely bulletproof.

>FCA quality

They really know how to make engines, so yes, they're quality.

>>17503218
>Giulietta
>1750 tbi

Sorry it's the heat...

However the message doesn't change