Post a pic of your favorite engine

>>17486238
Hell yeah!!!!!
https://youtu.be/9NqGL643Qp4

File: image.jpg (73KB, 550x365px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 550x365px

>>17486238

File: Tesla_Motors_Model_S_base[1].jpg (823KB, 2153x1431px) Image search: [Google]

823KB, 2153x1431px

<3

>>17486267
That's a pretty good engine

File: 4.0 liter I6.jpg (54KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 600x450px

>>17486267
Shid, wrong pic.

>>17486267
I hear that engine has lubrication issues though.

>>17486267
I'd suck a wet fart out of her asshole

File: Screenshot 2017-07-06 at 1.59.43 AM.png (333KB, 590x471px) Image search: [Google]

333KB, 590x471px

this desu shame it only got use in some suvs and never ever got boost outside of a few concepts

>>17486267
MODS!

File: thomasDM2407_468x377.jpg (34KB, 468x377px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 468x377px

>>17486238

File: 2015-ford-mustang-zombie-222-bloodshed-motors-5.jpg (280KB, 800x530px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 800x530px

>>17486250

Cute blender motors. Do they come in mens?

>>17486358
They are unisex.

>>17486358
>do they cum in men
wouldn't you like to know you faggot

Viper 8.4 V10
Voodoo
Aluminator XS
LS7
LT4
Chevy 572

In that order.

>>17486426
>no ll8 inline 6
pleb

File: katech-700-hp-lt1-engine-build.jpg (49KB, 640x426px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 640x426px

LT1 350 small block. Incredible engine note, crazy horsepower potential, super easy to work on

File: ejnnIU3_d.jpg (80KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 640x480px

How are you all this wrong

>>17486637
That is the definition of shit

>>17486659
I know you are but what am I?

>>17486659
Yes, renesis is pretty shitty.

File: tmp_5931-FB_IMG_1497243430175-663928690.jpg (75KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 960x720px

FORD IN EVERYTHING

File: engine-bay.jpg (123KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 800x533px

this

as if you lardasses would even recognize a non-LS engine

File: Screenshot_20170706-083611.png (1MB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 720x1280px

The VT Commodore will be a future classic and collectable.

>pic related, yesterday checking out granddads Olympic Edition VT

>>17486697
see >>17486350

File: 0JfaRID.jpg (424KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

424KB, 1680x1050px

>>17486238

File: Hbzz0uY.jpg (331KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 1200x800px

>>17486797

File: 1499207772372.jpg (51KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 1024x576px

>>17486259

File: mystery.jpg (106KB, 486x338px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 486x338px

Guess what.

>>17486637
>wankel
>without forced induction
No thanks.

File: Tesla-Model-S-Motor-Windell-Oskay-copy.jpg (93KB, 660x330px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 660x330px

>>17486238
Instant torque

>>17486246
Overrated power output, and terrible running on street.

>>17486865
gear reduction

>>17486888
You still have to deal with a powerband.

>>17486865
No torque at high speeds

File: aj30.jpg (41KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 400x300px

the 3.5 ecoboost before the boost or eco

File: Tesla-Model-S-Dyno.jpg (84KB, 1200x776px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1200x776px

>>17486898
ehh
at lest you have less back emf with an induction motor

File: 1288733422465.jpg (51KB, 500x386px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 500x386px

>>17486919
Forgive my ignorance, but I thought most (if not all) automotive electric motors were induction.

>>17486922
only recently is that the case

File: 3993840227_057d285d95_b.jpg (479KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

479KB, 1024x768px

*BRAP intensifies*

>>17486931
Wow really? They must've had fuckin massive brushes.

>>17486919
still better torque dip than a FA20

>>17486947
Brushless != induction

>>17486952
Fair point.

What's the diff? My 'education' is limited to handheld tools.

File: parts-catalog-66162_1b.jpg (142KB, 1000x1294px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1000x1294px

>>17486947
yes big like builders pencil
also massive battery's
even now so much as half an evs weight and bulk is in the battery's

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henney_Kilowatt#Performance_and_technology
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citicar#Specifications
for some time electric car development has been on hiatus
there was some revival in the 60s and 90s
but things have come along

>>17486956
brushed motors can deliver more torque but also are less efficient
and find use in forklifts and milk floats
also lathes and mills from around the 1950s to 1990s

the brushes generate some heat and friction
and also ozone from sparking

many are of a type where the commutator and bearing are vulnerable to dust

File: IMG_0454.jpg (83KB, 788x525px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 788x525px

>Not knowing of the beast itself

File: htup_0601_04_o+2000_acura_integra_type_r+engine_bay.jpg (468KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 1600x1200px

The GOAT itself from the land of godzilla, panty vending machines, and slightly elevated levels of radiation in certain areas...

File: VW-Golf-VII-GTI-40.jpg (495KB, 2000x1320px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 2000x1320px

40mpg AND 400 hp with stock internals and OEM turbo. This engine lives the dream.

>>17486941
An alternator that makes tesla fags cry.

>>17487249
If a Tesla gets stolen is it then called an Edison?

File: DSC_0965.jpg (117KB, 1023x680px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1023x680px

>>17486238

File: Screenshot_2017-07-06-14-11-01-1.png (466KB, 720x400px) Image search: [Google]

466KB, 720x400px

>>17486276
My nigga. DOHC 6G72 a best.

But 3.8 6G75 MIVEC is sexier. Boosted, AWD MIVEC 3g. Most people put the RIPP supercharger on, but I might get insane enough to try twincharging it.

>>17487197
Top taste

File: volvo_motormuseum_39.jpg (166KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1280x960px

Volvo's b230ft

Reliable as all hell and easy to work on/upgrade and tune

File: 1970_Dodge_Charger_R_T_440_Six_Pack_muscle_classic_engine_engines_2048x1536.jpg (893KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

893KB, 2048x1536px

Instant torque

File: 2016_05_31_IMG_3424.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

The BMW M70 and M73, they're basically the same shit with very little differences.

The Chrysler 2.2 Turbo II engine is a close second.

Mercedes 280e (w123)

File: 280e.jpg (479KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

479KB, 1024x768px

>>17487751

>>17486358
Oh I think you cum in men enough for all of us

File: IMG_0253.jpg (33KB, 630x420px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 630x420px

>>17486238

File: Keith-Dorton-Supercharged-SB2-02-970x520.jpg (138KB, 970x520px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 970x520px

>>17486238

>>17487562
There it is

modular and the stuff based off it.

>>17486667
That's a Wankel you retard. You are what's wrong with the automotive world.

>>17486637
Heaping pile of shit that will never exist again because it's retarded to seal.

>>17491316
Actually if GM would have further developed the wankel, would have been a good engine. Would have solved the pollution problem. As for the apex seals, they already last past 100k. Even the 787b at Lemans didn't break whole race on the same seals as when it started.

File: hot-rods-427-cammer-build.jpg (484KB, 2048x1340px) Image search: [Google]

484KB, 2048x1340px

>>17486238
Ford 427 SOHC

>>17491416
There to complex to mass produce. You have to mill out the housing for the rotors. You have to coat the inside of the housing if you want it to last more than 5k miles. You have to seal a large area side seals crank case seals and apex seals. They are inefficient because the rotor isn't being pushed at a 90 degree angle like a piston engine.

File: pushrods kek.png (2MB, 993x1549px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 993x1549px

>>17491599
>>17491316

>>17492847
Stay mad ICE cuck.

File: DSC01834[1].jpg (459KB, 2592x1944px) Image search: [Google]

459KB, 2592x1944px

>>17486238
Type 912 flat 12