:thinking emoji:
Which one for engine longevity ?
Neither.
>>17485399
either one, how else will you charge your battery? it's like you don't know about cars, anon :^)
>>17485399
>Adding additional components that make the engine work harder at higher temperatures and pressures
>longevity
|Select no more than one|
>>17485431
Let's say you wanted one and had to choose the one that would be less damaging...
>>17485451
nitrous
>>17485399
this one, obviously.
>>17485484
woah man, you'll blow up your engine with one of those
>>17485484
>gee bill, TWO alternators
>>17485484
no one needs THAT much power.
>>17485451
The procharger, maybe because they don't go as high as boost with out work. And it's not as much work.
>>17485451
Small turbo. Low compression engine, small bore and short stroke <1l. <10lbs boost.
Put it on a small motorcycle, not a heavy car.
>>17485484
is that a roush limited edition turbo m8?
>>17485399
I think the supercharger.
with a turbo you have back pressure and a lot higher exhaust temps which in turn lead to higher head temps and more strain on your cooling system. more chance of knock is the biggest problem that comes from those problems.
more chance for something to go wrong with a turbo and start pushing more boost into your engine.
although with a supercharger people seem to forgo intercoolers and so charge temps can be heaps higher.
the strain a supercharger puts on the crank is no more harmful then actually driving the car.
Either way you go, having good quality parts and a good tune will make things pretty reliable. going a step further and adding water injection or running e85 will make the thing super stable.
>>17485479
>he wants to endanger his manifold
ISHYGDDT
>>17485649
Appreciate the lengthy response m8. Will probably go with SC then
>>17485705
Just curious what car I'm having the same dilemma with my Svt Focus
>>17485816
...a V6 mustang. If another V8 pops up on CL at a good price I'll just buy that and sell mine but it hasn't happened recently...
>>17485484