but why?

>>17480634
Why WHAT?

It's the sensible choice

>>17480634
what a landbarge

Fat Americans

>>17480634
It's a legitimately good and sensible car

>>17480634
I'll stick to my pre-2010 civic sedans.

>>17480682
I assume OP is asking why a once sub-compact/compact car has become a mid-size one.

>>17480634
The hatchback looks better

>>17482442
>2800 lbs is a landbarge

Why are people so retarded?

It's incredibly well-equipped for a 20k car (carplay, decent enough sound system, fucking God-tier lanewatch, etc), gets great gas mileage (40+ mpg highway even going 80+ mph), and manages 0-60 in about 7 seconds which is pretty solid for an econobox.
Also the cvt is the best out there

>>17483770
They suck though

normies like hondas now

File: typer43 (1).jpg (314KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

314KB, 1280x853px

>>17486356
They're the last lightweight Civics with high revving engines if we're talking Si. I was going to buy a Civic coupe and enjoyed the test drive, but it was heavy as balls. Felt numb. The 8th gen is slower, but it's turning into a responsive old shitbox compared to the 10th gen.

>>17486386
You just think that because they feel like rattle cans at any speed. The new Civics are objectively better in every single way, Hell they're even lighter despite adding a turbo

>b-but muh feels

File: civic edit (integra).png (522KB, 901x578px) Image search: [Google]

522KB, 901x578px

>>17480634
I fixed it!