>*pulls up next to you*

File: eJwVzNENhCAMANBdGICWKnfiNgQJchFLaP0y7m7uDfBuc43DrGZX7bICbFUSj82K8ogl28Jcjhx7FZu4QVSNaW_5VAFy6DyGaQo0IyGRB1oW7wIh0hdnj5-AUNu_-fVinhe6gyGp.jpg (17KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 300x300px

>>17470187
>has the turning radius of a truck

>>17470187
>that front overhang

>>17470187
*gets an erection*
fuck, s-sorry, this doesn't normally happen I swear

>understeers off a cliff
>lands upright
>continues on, passengers ok, no airbags went off
>tiny scratch on rear quarter

>>17470250
Are volvos truly indestructible?

>>17470187
>psssh nothin personnel kidd..

>>17470190
It's 19.5'. Not great but not nearly as bad as the fucking P2 S60R/V70R

>>17470274
In the 80's/90's they were a lot more rigid than other brands. Not sure if it still applies today.

File: IMG_1669.png (54KB, 300x310px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 300x310px

>take a peek at the driver
>it's fucking pic related

>>17470187
Every time I see it, I have the giddy hope that mazda made a speed6 wagon I didn't hear about.

>>17470666
>*drifts behind u*

>>17471001
This, in the 90's lots of brands designed their cars to be safer for pedestrians. Mercedes was one of the safest brands to get hit by, while Volvo was known as the pedestrian killer due too high and rigid bumpers which pushed you under the car.
Those Volvo designs were outlawed by new EU regulations.
Plus those were still rwd, so the turning circle is comparable to that of a hatch like a Golf from that time or a new Polo

>>17471008
Damn right!

>>17471001
Volvo focuses on safety first and foremost, thing is cars are designed to crumple and absorb energy to protect their passengers

>>17470187
>Gets out of car
>Gets into passenger seat of Volvo

"You're my husband now."

>We drive into the sunset as I suck his cock