DB11 for daily use. V12 or V8?

they're both nice
flip a coin

>>17457763
>>17457764
What's the yearly cost of ownership for the v12?

File: DB11 with AMG power.jpg (132KB, 1504x443px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1504x443px

>>17457763

V8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2dqaTG3dC8

File: Db11 and vanquish lights.png (3MB, 2500x824px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2500x824px

>>17457763
I like the front of the car its gorgeous but what the fuck were they thinking with that rear? what was wrong with the old lights? what was wrong with the old taillight design such as the one used on the Vanquish which was done so well? not "current year" enough?

PS i'm becoming pretty convinced the 4chan captcha specifically is a piece of dogshit on purpose to get you to buy 4chan pass.

>>17457763
British sports cars should be v12

File: MALC2709-copy.jpg (4MB, 5472x3648px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 5472x3648px

>>17457768
about the same: they're both AMG engines.

>>17457815
>AMG engines
that's disappointing. thought it was unique to Aston.

>>17457792
The new look seems better integrated in the whole shape. Perhaps too futuristic for the mainstream user.

File: 1956 Aston Martin DBR1.png (1MB, 787x592px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 787x592px

Name one modern Aston Martin that isn't a money loser. Front-engined V12 Ferraris hold their value. Astons don't. This is for a reason.

>>17457801
Explain this.

>>17457763
Jesus, what's that clutter of vents and lines on the hood and why is the lower half of the bumper pushed in and covered with a shitty net?

File: 2017_ferrari_gtc4lusso_1.jpg (160KB, 704x396px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 704x396px

>>17457835
AM DB11 or Ferrari GTC4Lusso?

>>17457848
Ooops, wrong quote.

>>17457827
>Front-engined V12 Ferraris hold their value
the 612 is cheap as fug right now actually.

>>17457827
>Front-engined V12 Ferraris hold their value
400i
412
456
612

All the cheapest of their respective eras. Good cars hold their value at the end of the day, not that badge and configuration.

>>17457848
man that thing is fuckn ugly
2/10

>>17457992
i actually think the 612 is sexy now even though I hated it when it was new. it's very understated. still want the 599 though.

>>17457829
It's a Grand tourer, v12 has the best balance.

>>17458024
I'm not a fan of either the 612 or 599 but their interiors were near perfect before the refresh

File: 2017-Pagani-Huayra-Roadster-Interior-Engine[1].jpg (830KB, 1931x1365px) Image search: [Google]

830KB, 1931x1365px

>>17457824

>disappointing

AMG engines are very amazing. $2.1 million Pagani car has it.

>The Huayra uses a twin-turbo, V12 engine developed by Mercedes-AMG. The Huayra's 6.0-litre engine, the M158, produces 730 PS (720 hp, 539 kW) and 738 lb·ft (1,000 N·m) of torque. Its top speed is about 238 mph (383 km/h) and it has a 0-60 acceleration time of 2.8 seconds.

>Aston
>muh unique
>British engineering

Ain't Nobody Got Time Fo Dat!

test

File: 2014-eagle-low-drag-gt-xk6-engine-08.jpg (688KB, 2048x1340px) Image search: [Google]

688KB, 2048x1340px

>>17457815
only the V8 is amg
>>17457801
>wrong