>$400k for a Toyota
>100k for a nissan
>$450k for a V6 Ford
>>17450081
datsun
>100k for a fiat
>$140k for a vw beetle
>>17450081
>100k
110k for base GT-R
150k for Nismo GT-R
230k for N-Attack GT-R (muh 7:08 burgerking)
>$2.7 million for a vw
>$1.2 million for a lotus
>$200k for a Honda
>$4.5 million for a honda
>paying more than $25,000 for any car, ever.
People are just too damn picky.
>50 million for a volvo
what a fucking dumbass thread
>>17450225
engine placement on that thing freaks me the fuck out.
>>17450225
>turbines not at the front
>>17450280
>shitposting; priceless
>+$ for a GM
$58 million for a SAAB
>>17450129
>being so poor you cant afford a vw
pleb
>>17450280
>how can gm compete
>they can
>assmad fangirl
>why hasnt nissan responded to this
>fake laptimes lmao
>nope sperg more
>lmao I gave him a complex
>assmad
>nope
>yep
>nope
>yep
>nope
>yep
Yeah, this thread totally sucks compared to other /o/ threads
>>17450293
Why? Have you never seen an MD-80 or Boeing 717 before? They're extremely common in US domestic flights.
>>17450293
You ain't seen nothing yet.
>>17450280
>/o/'s best thread in years
>is somehow upset about it
Wow awesome thread anon
>>17450497
Thank You anon.
>>17450352
dude that gives ptsd when ever i get baited into a retarded tripfag argument
>>17450517
lmao, even anons are getting complexes now
>3 million for a mustang
>>17450528
reminder that porsche btfos the world and germans engineering can't be compared to american and japanese """"""engineering''''''''''
>2016 Hellcat
>707HP
>1944 Hellcat
>2200HP
Dodgefags will defend this
>>17450295
>>17450061
>$400k for a Toyota that isn't the 2000GT/ GT Roadster
FTFY
>>17450459
Those have the engines mounted on the fuselage. Honda jet has the engines mounted to the wings on the top. Shits weird yo
>>17450756
Ok, so, considering that back in 1944 most cars made like at most 200hp
and now we have cars making 3000+Hp
Could they bring back a propeller fighter with like 33,000 horsepower?
>>17450756
And it's 2200 HP at 10,000 ft in the cold upside down for 16 hours.
>>17450881
Yeah, but plane engines are fire spewing demons, theres literally nothing that compares.
No joke, aircraft engines legitimately scare me, they're evil beasts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9i6sPBxN1fM
>>17450894
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RW-G7pF6gUQ
>>17450126
How many people even own an N-Attack GTR
>>17450225
$436.9million for a Rolls Royce
>>17450087
>b-butt muh e-ecoh bewst!
St-stay mad, Europouer! *Sniff*
>>17450899
>>17450894
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1BcciKPKpu4
They make any car engine look tame by comparison.
>>17450880
Propellers can only go so fast, at a certain speed, they're pointless.
>>17450087
We dont like it either. The fact that a V6 can make good horsepower has been proven by every fuccboi with a 1000hp supra.
>>17450880
Pretty sure you would destroy the plane with that motor. The propellers at least would explode.
>>17450918
>supra
>V6
>30 million $ for a Mitsubishi
>>17450531
>6 million dollars for a benz
>>17450880
well seeing as how the most powerful prop engine makes 15,000 hp and was made in the 50s who knows itd be kinda dumb to do
maybe run a couple of those on a smaller plane
also the propellers break the sound barrier
>>17450061
$400k for one of the few confirmed god machines built in the last decade. Even the bench racers' messiah jumped on the bandwagon. It's also the fastest of the god machines, too.
>>17450928
>6 million
>>17450094
more like a Neon.
>>17450247
Geely, you meant
>>17450938
Anyone have a cap of the post with the supersonic prop plane that never took off because its propellers were constantly creating sonic booms on the runway, shattering glass and giving people insane headaches.
>>17451252
dont have the post but the plane was the Thunderscreech
>the shock-waves created by the prop engine were so powerful and the sound level so extreme that it induced intense nausea and raging headaches among the ground crew. The ‘Thunderscreech’ was born.
the TU-95 up there is loud af but its not that bad
The Thunderscreech flew but it was a failure for more reasons than causing people to vomit
>>17450317
/thread
>the sound of the LFA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNEVa7mp1Lo
>>17450998
Kek
>>17451465
>>17450295
>$1.6 billion for a tesla
good job doug de meme-o
>>17451465
it's honestly not that great
>>17450459
>>17450479
You aren't getting it.
>>17450918
cant tell if bait or mentally handicapped walrus shitposting on /o/
>>17450998
I laughed harder than I should have.
>140k for snek
wait thats actually good
>$38 million for a Fiat
>>17450136
>Deformed lotus
>>17450136
>sells fewer units than >>17450087
Really makes you ponder
>>17451889
Does the Camaro have kickass 4 exhaust pipes on the back though? Checkmate :P
>>17451889
Zonda laps in 6:30
>>17450894
its awesome isn't it
>>17451889
>>17450103
2+mil for a beetle
>>17450908
If he was real, /ourguy/ would own a black one.
>>17450061
I'd rather pay 200k for an LFA than 150k for an NSX or GT-R. A 9500RPM V10 sound-engineered by a music company is worth 100k alone.
>>17452361
>200k
I mean 400k
>>17451783
Fucking audiophiles
>>17450894
>you could literally the hellcat never ending exhaust flame when it goes full out to catch up in a dogfight from miles away on another plane
FUCKING AWESOME
>>17452361
Not a 9.5k V10
But Yamaha made a V8 for volvo that also sounds fucking great
$90K for Chevy
>>17451903
Yes
>>17452823
Cadillac CT6 is Cadillac's design and platform. not Chevy's.
>>17452971
Then, Audi A6 is Audi's design and platform. not VW's
>what is MLB
>>17450061
I saw the Doug review too, i actually use to live in that town he was in.
>$40k for a Fuji
>>17450061
And it's completely worth it if i was rich i would had bought one it's one of my dream cars
>>17452495
Yamaha tuning their inline-5 when?
>>17450926
>30 million
Those things were ridiculously expensive. Try like 100+ million
>>17450061
350$ for a honda
>>17450908
I'd imagine very few people own one. It's car exclusively meant for the track. I guess maybe I could see some rich dude buying an N-attack and just dailying it, but that might be a super rare case.
>>17453798
Never, Volvo is a 4cyl only brand now.
>>17452472
What?
>$250k for an Audi
>>17455100
>$4000000 for an Audi