y/n
Shoulda lifted it, made a semi-proper offroader.
>>17434962
Hell yea
Yes until they lift and rally it
degenerates, this is why hitler was a good guy
He's gonna start hating that roof rack as soon as he starts doing highway speeds for more than ten minutes.
>In 1981 Thierry De Montcorgé made a bet with friends that he'd be able to compete in the famous African rally with his luxurious Rolls-Royce Corniche. Of course, the Rolls had to be specially adapted for the desert, which meant dispensing with such essentials as the mini bar, Grey Poupon and rather more besides. De Montcorgé commissioned a special body that weighed only 80kg and added a 4WD system borrowed from a Toyota. Sadly, he was disqualified while competing for 13th place after making an illegal repair.
I dig it. The rack looks fucking dumb though
its ugly but far from ruined just typical attention whore camo wrap on expensive car
>>17434997
Apparently it's fine!
They used magnets to attach the rack to the roof
Link to video of the car
https://youtu.be/dG9g7MQuzKM
Ruined? y/n
>>17435064
Kinda y
>>17435064
This makes me not want to be a stancefag
>>17434944
It was ruined before it left the factory
>>17434944
No, shoulda gone further. Smaller rims with meatier but similar size rubber. Maybe a bit wider outside the fenders with a bit of lift.
Wrap is meh to my tastes.
>>17435064
yes. pls raise.
There is something about RRs that make them look like they were really meant for offroad
>>17435132
This
>>17434944
I bet he vapes.
>>17435064
yeah, dumb fuck can't even afford a bodykit, that rake is disgusting
Not ruined
>>17435025
I was talking about the noise. Whenever someone permanently drives around with a roof rack you instantly know it's either someone with an offroader that can barely do highway speed anyway, or a retarded American who never goes faster than 70 anyway.
>>17434944
No, it triggers poorfags so it's obviously awesome.
Triggering some snobs by desacralizing luxury cars is my fetish.
>>17435352
We share a fetish.
TaxTheRich100, the king of all desacralizatiors https://youtu.be/Z-4v4I7Gzk0
>>17435378
>>17434944
All of whats on there is easily reversible.
when you start doing suspension modifications that affect the frame integrity, then yes you can argue its ruined.
>>17435378
Gotta admit the guy has skills. I wouldn't dare drift a 2.5 tons behemoth on grass between trees.
https://youtu.be/Ap9eROAo82U
>>17435519
Oh absolutely!! He's very talented.
Here he is doing extremely risky stuff with ~2,4 mil Ferrari 288 GTO Group B spec
https://youtu.be/UKm-wcxkl5U
>>17435519
Must have good insurance
>>17435352
I could get down with that
>>17436098
>>17435352
>>17434997
He drove 2000km from Rotterdam to Marbella straight before he made the presentation vid.
>>17436375
I guess what anon meant is that those roof racks make a lot of noise at high speed.
>>17436098
>>17436162
I'm more triggered by the fact that it reminds me of bad fetish porn edits than anything else.
>>17435519
Those angles, that speed, drifting in such tight spaces in such a large, heavy car! And he's doing it in an expensive car like a Rolls Royce? He's fucking insane!
Simulations man, you MUST explain this guy's weakness, otherwise I won't be able to win!
>>17434944
>the camo is fuck ugly and doesn't match the environment
>suspension is still too low
>some more tread
but seeing as how those are things you cant change on a rolls no
almost said yes
>>17435064
>stance
>rims
>splitter
>fag in a bag
yes