How long until self driving cars become a legal requirement?

>crashes are eradicated forever

heh

>>17429494
As long as women and minorities exist, there will be crashes

>>17429579
You win tha interbuts...

>>17429562
Probably 99%. Only thing to cause crashes would be components failing.

>>17429494
i hope they crush all the dangerous drivable cars too

>>17429684
what about animals suddenly entering the roads? rockslides? terrorism?

>>17429494
When we figure out a way to implant chips in pedestrians and cyclists heads.

>>17429708
Animals will be detected by sensors, easy.
The whole point is that all cars near each other connected with 5G will simply avoid each other or know instantly when the other is breaking.

>>17429699
Yeah me too

>>17429719
But you will be detected by sensors so meh

>>17429771
I doubt that the sensors would be able to penetrate the forest or a hedge. what about tall grass?

>>17429783
Tell me how an animal would cause a fatal accident.

>>17429865
Ever see a car after it hits a moose or horse?

>>17429865
>car travelling at high speed
>suddenly moose
>

File: 1498176596361.png (1MB, 972x767px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 972x767px

>>17429562
>crashes eternally

Don't buy a new car and don't live in an urban shithole.
Problem solved.

>>17429494
>How long until self driving cars become a legal requirement?
They won't, think about it: the politician that tries to ban drivable cars would be the most unpopular politician ever.

>>17429494
privately owned cars should be outlawed, it's such an unnecessary load on the earth. public transportation IS the future

>>17429909
>>17429913
Well I guess you should avoid rural roads, but besides the car hitting the moose all traffic near would break instantly so yeah..

>>17430066
It's brake, you fucking illiterate busrider.
Stop making these dumb bait threads.

>>17430093
What are you on aboot?

>>17430066
>avoid rural roads

everyone doesn't live in a city surrounded by skyscrapers, concrete and asphalt