FIT SI LEAKED

>>17426404
>yfw the hybrid is faster.

>>17426434
delete this immediately.

File: 1481513780598.gif (712KB, 600x525px) Image search: [Google]

712KB, 600x525px

why doesnt anyone want to make 3 door hothatches anymore

>>17426404
fuck no. bring back the CRX

>>17426501
I'll buy a Fit Si or a new CRX Si, literally whichever comes out first.

File: 2018-Honda-Fit-Jazz-5.jpg (180KB, 1600x901px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 1600x901px

The seats in the (((hybrid))) are really fucking nice DESU

I hope they put those in other trims.

>>17426404
Remember when hatches didn't look like minivans without something to tell you how small they were? Bit seriously HOLY SHIT YES HONDA YES

File: Honda-Civic-JDM-EP3-51.jpg (525KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

525KB, 2048x1365px

>>17426565
Literally the only problem with minivans is how big they are. Eggmode with a big raked windshield that flows from the hood is the supreme aesthetic.

>>17426598
best civic ever.

>>17426483

no one drives cars with less than 4 doors anymore

>>17426404
>inb4 no us release
Still waiting on that S1000 that can't pass side impact (((crash testing))).

File: absolute triggered field.png (17KB, 220x200px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 220x200px

>>17426942
>>inb4 no us release

don't even fucking say that anon

>>17426831
Agreed. Thought about trading my CRX for one, but never got around to it.

Too bad they based it on the 3rd generation Fit.
The second gen Fit looks much nicer.

>>17426966
who would trade that civic for a crx? I love my crx but that civic is worth much more

>>17426501
>>17426525
crx si would be the shit. Unveiling when??

>>17426831
At what? Having a really shitty suspension and steering setup? Having a dildo shifter with absolutely piss poor feedback and feel? Agreed.

>>17426404
>inb4 not available in USA/Canada market

It's going to be the 1.5 turbo isn't it?

File: notably-dangerous-texan-erection-57e4158f95e0d.jpg (97KB, 728x752px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 728x752px

>>17426404
Fug, my wallet.

File: 1492442926408.png (292KB, 496x494px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 496x494px

AYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY LES GO HONDA AYYYYYYY
>post yfw they make it rwd

they made a fit si in europe once and it was slower than a USDM fit.

>>17426483
Cause 5 door is just better on any hatch that isn't a golf. Even then 5 door is bretty gud on the golf. Get a coupe if you want 2 door.

File: CRX Crash.jpg (133KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 640x480px

>>17426501
>>17426525
>>17428166
>Safety
Never coming back

rwd confirmed my dad is nintenado

>>17426942
>S1000
It's an S660.

>>17426539
those look nice but there's no way those fins wont bother you.

>>17426404
is this real

File: IMG_0104.jpg (237KB, 1600x992px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 1600x992px

>>17426483
Americans cant have nice things.

>>17428399
>nice things
>that sketchers shoe of a car

>>17428399
You can keep your shitbox hatchbacks.

File: IMG_1058.jpg (244KB, 1700x1060px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 1700x1060px

>>17426483

>>17428171
Shut the hell up faggot. Don't post in my thread ever again.

>>17428213
That would be lovely.

File: Fiat-500-Abarth-2012-14.jpg (267KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 1600x1200px

>>17428310
Typical 5-door fag, no appreciation for the aesthetic perfection that comes with a 3 door.

File: HOLY SHIT.gif (2MB, 450x253px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 450x253px

>>17428531
>subcompact hothatch
>with 3-doors
>and nip reliability
>and a fucking supercharger

The Fit Si is my dream car after a New CRX Si based on the Fit platform though. If neither of those happen I'm going to be all over this.

>implying it'll even release in the US

>>17428171
>dildo shifter with absolutely piss poor feedback and feel

That dildo shifter is literally god tier and on par with Honda's best, it gets compared to the feel of an S2000 all the damn time and you can immediately go from steering to shifting because of the distance involved. Also frees up a nice center console space that's usually occupied. You've got a point about the suspension being a downgrade from the more hardcore ones from the 90s but it's still not bad, it blows the generic commuterbox out of the water still.

>>17428171
Which model are we talking about now? The JDM doesn't have a shit suspension like the EU one

>>17428316
how about you just don't crash?

File: IMG_9842.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x4032px

>>17428399
>nice things
>ferd

Why is it that Ford hot shitboxes have track cred but everyone else's fall flat?

File: DSC_0571.jpg (133KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 1024x683px

>3door
>5door

Both can get FUCKED.

>>17431394
I've never seen a Ford hot hatch at a trackday in europe, and even if one turned up on an open track day at the Nordschleife they were not using them in anger.

quick drivers in hot hatches pretty much exclusively use various VAG products, Renault Clios and Meganes.
I assume fords aren't up to regular track driving.

>>17431388
>That license plate
Cringe

>>17431441
well europe has a wider selection of hot hatches. but in US where I'm at I see ST at every single autox or track day. Usually it's more rare to see a VW GTI

>>17431441
Track days in the UK are full of STs, RSs and Vauxhall (Opel) Corsa VXRs

I think it's down to regional loyalty, since Ford is much larger in the UK than say Germany

>>17431441
I guess I'm thinking of North America.

Ford, recently, has been giving the NA market the Euro-spec hot hatches we've long been denied, while everyone else continues to deliver watered-down versions of 'EDM/JDM'.

In NA there's nothing to compete with the Focus RS or the v6 turbo Fusion (forget what it's called), and the Focus/Fiesta STs seem to have much more cred than the other hot-but-not-too-hot hatches.

Personally I don't get the whole segment (if you want a sports car buy a sports car), but Ford seems to be doing a better job of giving people the racey FWD/AWD mainstream hatches/sedans.

>>17431127
The person in that CRX was hit by a drunk driver in an RV. Good luck surviving that in a CRX. The driver didn't.

>>17429250
You're cherry picking now. Most hatches look better with 5 doors.

>>17432759
I think there would be a lot of cars out there that wouldn't be able to protect their drivers in a crash with a fucking RV.

>>17432850
Did you even see that see that CRX? Modern cars would at most, leave you with injuries like a broken leg, and broken ribs. Cars from the 80s and 90s crumble like tin cans.

File: 1310408064982_zps11ffb953.jpg (10KB, 441x408px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 441x408px

>>17426404
>Yfw it will be a 1.5 vtecless turbo with a cvt with (((manual shifting)))

File: 06r32_800_001.jpg (59KB, 800x300px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 800x300px

>>17432767
Sure thing buddy

>>17433357
notice how i already mentioned the golf. but even then 5 door is bretty gud. There just aren't any cars out there that look better with 3 doors rather than 5.

>>17426404
where are proofs

>>17428271
>Honda
>RWD
pick one dude.

File: Screenshot_20170626-142621.png (710KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

710KB, 720x1280px

>>17433474
Are you surea about that?

File: ford-fiesta-st-5dr-vs-3dr-side[1].jpg (120KB, 1600x550px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1600x550px

>>17433986

Some are ok, but most modern 3 doors and coupes have too much empty space in the rear quarter. The fuckhuge belt lines make it even worse.

>>17433986
That's a 90s coupes. The problem is cars were smaller back then, so 2 doors worked perfectly. But with cars being as large as they are today, there are just awkward gaps that need to be filled. So the 5-doors end up looking better.

>>17426483
Hot hatches aren't fast nor sporty enough to justify the impracticality of 3 doors.

File: honda-jazz-si-front-track[1].jpg (82KB, 1013x675px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1013x675px

>>17426404
Don't get your hopes up, the last one they did was literally an appearance package and some slightly sportier suspension.

File: 1498305095832.png (373KB, 577x500px) Image search: [Google]

373KB, 577x500px

>>17435531
Considering I have literally zero friends to drive around, the larger doors of a 3-door is actually more practical to me.

That said I just strongly prefer the aesthetics of a 3-door.

>>17435553
>Considering I have literally zero friends to drive around, the larger doors of a 3-door is actually more practical to me.
>That said I just strongly prefer the aesthetics of a 3-door.
Same here brother, I know all of those feels

>t. owner of a 2008 3dr Golf shitbox

>>17435547
The "Jazz Si" was the Fit Sport in the US.

File: cherry-picking.jpg (203KB, 1600x1197px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 1600x1197px

>>17435517

>>17436130

He is right tho

>>17436130
More like you're cherry picking. It's just fact. Cars are larger today so you ended up with the stretched doors and long panels of nothing that it simply doesn't work out anymore. You showed me a golf, a panda, one of the few small hatches left, and then immediately jumped to some 90s car.

Most 2 door versions of 4 door (or 3 door/5 door) cars look like fucking ass. They were made to be sedans, so they gave all this weird empty space in the body work. It just screams desperation to be sporty.

File: 1353567548074.jpg (27KB, 375x383px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 375x383px

>>17436696
>More like you're cherry picking

If I may say as an outside observer, I believe you are both cherry picking!

>>17436701
To each their own then. Even in the case of the BMW 3s, I always preferred the coupe.

>>17428171
I've got one of these in my driveway, but I'm in the US so it's the watered down one. I've done a LOT to the motor and run sticky tires but I have not touched the suspension. It handles great. Stock the weakest link is the wheels and tires, next is brakes, then the synchros. Suspension is last. Sure, it's macpherson strut up front but compared to your average hatch it's some next-level handling. The feedback is really good once you get some 17's on it, the squishy stock 15's with big sidewalls ruin everything. The power steering only helps in low speeds and parking lots. When I let friends drive they always comment on how stiff it is and how hard the wheel is to turn, and they go like 10mph under the limit when they normally drive 10mph over or more. The stock 4.76 gears, exhaust, and low seating position makes them think they're going twice what they are. But my favorite part is the aesthetics, I've got a silver one with bronze wheels and black wing. That and it's a Civic that is relatively slow stock, and now it rapes modded WRX's. I should put it back on the road, but I've been liking my Chebby boat.

File: 6f3974cf54433f549adfeab43a1c9ebb.jpg (117KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 960x720px

>>17432869
All 4 passengers walked out without a scratch. We rolled at 60+mph. All the windows were down and the sunroof was open.

>>17436865
Except that I am not. Most modern cars simply don't come out that great in 2-doors because of their size. There are tons of examples of it on the road today.

>>17436969
That was pure luck. Modern cars would have not have a collapsed roof. Also, a rollover is actually safer because energy dispersed more quickly. A car t-boning you at 30mph would leave you injured in that old car. Please do not try to say that that 80s and 90s cars are even in the same solar system in terms of safety vs modern cars.

File: 1436212057473.jpg (33KB, 420x443px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 420x443px

>>17426404
but thats just the refresh for next year. its not an SI.

Will I fit in a fit?

>6'3" and fat

Is this legit or am I being rused?

if this is real I might seriously hold off on buying a new car and look into this. Was looking at a Fiesta ST but an Si Fit would be amazing

>>17437252
I'm sure the other guy doesn't think he's cherry picking either. Just saying.

Well, at least this Fit actually looks manly. All the ones before this looked like they should be owned by middle-aged librarians and soccer moms.

>>17437522
It's pretty dang spacious for a subcompact. I'm pretty sure you would, but your best bet is to sit in one on a showroom floor to see for yourself.

File: IMG_5554.png (276KB, 424x412px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 424x412px

>>17426501
>>17426525
>not supercharging your CR-Z at the dealership

>>17438937
CRZ has zero traction already thanks to the elec motor torque.
It would be damn near useless with the supercharger. I'm not even sure the ATB diff Honda offers would do much more than let you leave 2 black lines instead of one...

>>17438937
>umaru
Didnt even read your post but its probably as shit as your waifu

>>17438952
There are a surprising amount of parts available from Honda directly. Including said supercharger, LSD, suspension, exhaust, brakes and wheels.

File: PicsArt_1367774926144[1].jpg (65KB, 500x177px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 500x177px

>>17436875

Even fanboys think its ghastly looking.

Coke bottle coupes are best coupes.

>>17438952
>It would be damn near useless with the supercharger.

Yeah if you keep the shitty stock tires. Even those hold up pretty well.

T. S/C CRZ owner

>>17440264
To each their own, my dude.

>>17438863
He is I'm not. He's showing the last of a kind. I'm telling him what modern cars have become.

>>17428328
Google S1000. It was going to be a 1.0L turbo 4 pot for the US market. Don't be an uninformed mong trying to correct others.

>>17426404
Can't believe nobody knew this already, it's not a leaked SI. It's literally just the refreshed 2017 RS from Thailand. Came out awhile ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlYA4GXAaes

>>17426404
Isn't this the car that everyone says is a slow fag mobile?

>>17441648
You're the uninformed one mate. Your info is coming from a bunch of clickbait websites. No legit automotive site has written anything about any s1000. Stop being a mong who believes clickbait. Also, think about it logically. A Honda Civic comes with a 1.5L turbo 4-cylinder. So why the hell would they put a 1.0L turbo 4-cylinder in a 30k+ car. It would ATLEAST be a 2.0L turbo 4.

>Oh, something's got me so excited, baby
>A feeling I've been holdin' back so long
>You got me shook up, shook down, shook out on your lovin'
>And fit si, I can't wait to get started lovin' you

>>17443174
again, no fit si. There is NO FIT SI.
>>17441683

In fact it looks like the NA models won't even get LED lights, which is fucking sad but fucking typical. Just a shitty new bumper and some shitty halogens and shitty honda sensing to jack the price up.

>>17441689
It is indeed the car of choice for fudge packers and librarians.

>>17435730
except that the jazz si had an horrible yuropoor engine.

>>17441636
>He is I'm not.
I'm sure that's what he's thinking about you.

>>17445111
He provided the only ONE example there really is in modern cars. There simply is no other equivalent today. While every other coupe these days looks like stretched garbage. So he in fact is, I am not. There are really no good looking coupes anymore due to the sheer size cars have become. That is fact, not opinion.

>>17426831
its literally the worst civic ever, you need to check your honda privileges

>>17447312
I'm tired of cherries, can we go strawberry picking instead?

File: 8215dd2de280c0b67eab9d55895f9bcf.jpg (44KB, 320x213px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 320x213px

>>17433474
>hatches look better with 5 doors
In which dimension is that they do?

File: nu-male-has-beard-and-or-glasses-20-30-years-old-commonly-prematurely-17421852.png (164KB, 500x580px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 500x580px

>>17426404
These cars just scream 'Low T'

>>17437522

My dad is 6'2" 220 and fits fine