/superhatch/ club.
To join /superhatch/ club, your hatchback needs to do the following:
>0 - 60 sub 5 seconds
>300+ bhp
Not so fast Golf R cucks.
tfw 7.6 seconds and 160 hp and you can't stop me from posting up in this thread that will die anyways because there's maybe three people that browse /o/ with those requirements.
>>17406027
go be a benchracer somewhere else.
and not fwd. you forgot that part OP
>>17407832
Focus-bro?
>>17407863
Nah man, civic si. When that there i-vtec kicks in I'm suddenly a race car driver breh.
Anything more than 200hp on top of FWD seems rather pointless. Is that FERD AWD, op?
>>17407855
and not FWD biased haldex """awd"""
>>17407872
That cars kinda cuck now. not fast enough, modern 4 banger are rapidly approacing that.
Hell even the new 4 banger camry is now over 200 horse. Thats V6 numbers from early 2000's -mid 2000's.
/superhatch/
>250 in existence
>>17407996
What a bizarre hatch, dont think id ever want a "volvo" hatch. Just weird.
>>17407967
The magic is in the three door setup with huge 'unsafe' windows and being smaller than a modern day Honda fit. Cars have long since gotten as small as they ever will because of regulation so those actually small cars will eventually be sought after.
Also if I wanted to tarbo it and eventually kill the engine I could easily get into the ballpark of 250 hp but I'd rather get a car that starts in that neighborhood than try to get there myself.
>>17407872
Ah, right; I'm a couple seconds slower to 60.
Not bad for an SE... Wish I had the ST so I could feel like racecar though.
I'm strongly considering getting a Golf R in the next few months. It's a lot more understated than its competitors which I like and it makes good power with a cheap tune. Focus RS interior blows and in my opinion the suspension is too stiff for everyday use.
Might go for a secondhand M235i or Audi S3. They depreciate so fast that 2015/2016 CPO cars with 10-15k miles are significantly cheaper than a 2017 Golf/Focus.