>1.5L turbo 4 for the low end models
>2.0L turbo 4 for the Accord Sport
>3.0L twin-turbo V6 with torque vectoring AWD for the top end
I don't want the V6 Accord to go away
Honda employee here, nobody buys the V6 except low-key richfags and women.
Did they really get rid of the manual?
(I only looked at wikipedia.)
>>17402686
>Honda V6 turbo engines
>>17402714
Both engine choices for the new Accord will have manuals available. They're doing pretty good at keeping manuals in their cars.
Source: HondaProJason
>>17402714
Honda keeping the manuals alive because other manufacturers can't make a proper gearbox.
>>17402721
>>17402732
Based, my heart dropped when I saw this.
> Transmission: Continuously variable transmission (CVT), 10-speed automatic
But now there's a giant [[[citation neeeded]]] lol.
My parents both drove manual Accords when I was a kid and I've always wanted one. Of course now even the Civic is bigger.
>>17402753
Yeah I'm glad they at least understand that a lot of their supporters still want the old manual. Accord has been pretty consistent in its size so far. The 2017 model is only 3 inches longer than the "boat" 2003 model.
>>17402785
I don't really need to replace my shitbox but I'll probably buy a new car with a manual in the next year or two, just so that the manufacturers don't kill them off. It seems that most of the people who prefer manual buy used. In my area a manual accord costs like twice as much as an automatic on craigslist.
>>17402839
They had two brand new manual Fits at my local dealer that I was really wanting but it just wasn't happening for me at the time. Need to work on my credit a bit more. I'm very happy with my 94 Civic, though.
>>17402899
Too bad, Fits are pretty neat. At least you don't have to be this guy to afford one.
>>17403009
>tfw both of them are still on the site
Man nobody wants them but me I think. I'd need a $0 down deal to get one right now. Got too much shit going on to go for it. They're both white, too.