Does /o/ like art deco cars?

they're degenerate

>>17391498
No, I don't like ugly cars.

I don't think that architecture translated into car design at any point in time, especially not before the war when the form of vehicles was still largely dominated by the positioning of functional elements.

File: [email protected] (241KB, 1664x936px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 1664x936px

>>17391498
They're great eye candy and are magnificent achievements in car design...I'd be scared to drive one though.

>>17391498
They look beautiful but they're super rare and are now only driven by stuck-up rich twats. They're also so dangerous in a crash that they make 50s landyachts look like they're made of pillows and bubble wrap

File: [email protected] (257KB, 2000x968px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 2000x968px

Yes, *real* Art Deco cars and not those abominations

Like this "sharknose" Graham

File: chrysler-airflow-1935-4.jpg (326KB, 1701x1051px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 1701x1051px

Learn2Deco Europe

File: Phantom-Corsair-Coolest-Car-Ever-Made-4.jpg (545KB, 4358x2610px) Image search: [Google]

545KB, 4358x2610px

Possibly the scariest motherfucker ever conceived.

>>17393853
>doyoufeelincharge.jpg

>>17393347
>Art Deco
>French origin
>Calls actual French cars abominations
>Calls a Burgerland car real Art Deco

>>17393347
Someone should tell him to clean his headlights.