Why do Camaro fags always boast about their 455hp outta 6.2l,

Ford Racing power pack gets you 472HP while retaining your warranty

The Coyote makes even a lot of Euro V8's seem lacking

Have a (You), now get out .

File: 250px-HondaS2000-003.jpg (23KB, 250x188px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 250x188px

>>17389649
why do ford fags always boast about 435hp out of a 5.0l, when the s2000 can push 250 out of 2.0l

Honda obviously builds the best engines

>>17389649
Actually, porsche builds far better engines. Naturally aspirated and several litres less....and they make more power.

And then there's the 918. Try beating that HP per litre.

>>17389668
this. porsche makes like 180hp per litre in the 918

ford BTFO

>>17389668
>918
Slower than the ecoboost rxc turbo

>>17389649
because a stock ls motor out of an express van can be boosted to 1000hp, while a mod motor splits in half

>>17389677
post laptime to prove it?

oh wait, you can't

File: mercedes-amg-project-one-side-view-homepage.jpg (637KB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

637KB, 2048x1360px

>>17389666
Why do Honda fags always boast about 250hp outta 2.0L, when AMG can get 1000hp out of 1.6L?

Mercedes obviously builds the best engines

>>17389666
Could that do it whilst meeting current emissions regulations?

>>17389688
>spoon feed me mommy!
ROTFLMAO

File: 220px-BMW_F1_Engine_M12_M13.jpg (10KB, 220x165px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 220x165px

>>17389690
ok we're talking turbos now are we

Why do mercedes fags always boast about 1000hp outta 1.6l, when BMW can get 1500hp out of 1.5L?

BMW obviously builds the best engines

>>17389690
>turbos and electric motors
you are fucking retarded, didnt get the comparison, and should stop posting

>>17389713
without electrocuck motors too

>>17389649
>hp/L

It's been debated over and over. hp/L doesn't matter.

Dumb summerfags.

File: 112_0502_numbers05_z.jpg (31KB, 480x535px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 480x535px

Why do euro fags always boast about 1500hp outta 1.5l, when Top Fuel Dragsters can get 11000hp out of 8.2L?

Americans obviously builds the best engines

File: 1390098199240.jpg (47KB, 800x747px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 800x747px

I have never once heard a chevy guy talk about horsepower per liter because its irrelevant

The chevy engine it better

Better MPG
More power under the curve
Weighs less
More reliable
Cheaper to repair
Aftermarket parts are cheaper
Better trans options

There is a reason why everyone is swapping the LS engine and not Mod motors
The 5.0 is a big improvement over the 4.6 i agree but the small block chevy might be the GOAT overall for engines

>>17389737
>needs to be rebuilt after 6 seconds

lmao

File: 1496286567354.png (276KB, 424x412px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 424x412px

>>17389747
reminder there is no LS engine running 5's down the quarter mile

>>17389750
>AMG engine needs rebuild after 3000km
>BMW engine needs rebuild after 3 laps
>Top Fuel engine needs rebuild after 3 second

Isn't the whole idea of this to be retarded to prove HP/L is a meme?

>>17389747
>There is a reason why everyone is swapping the LS engine and not Mod motors
because they are pieces of shit that junkyards pretty much give away for free

File: IMG_9887.png (546KB, 941x734px) Image search: [Google]

546KB, 941x734px

>>17389649
Why does ford exist?

>>17389772
>track package
>more expensive as tested

>>17389778
>Faster

>>17389784
im sure if you put sricky tires, a retarded GT wing, and front splitter on the v6 mustang it would go fast as well

>>17389682
yet no LS has gone faster than the fastest Modulars

huh

>>17389772
392 hemi SRT trim 485HP 475TQ

>>17389752
reminder there are probably 1000 times more 8 second LS cars than mod motor cars

I bet there are more 8 second chevy powered mustangs than there are 8 second ford powered ones
>>17389770
What? The mod motor cam in all sorts of cars and trucks. They are very uniform but they are a shit tier swap hence why everyone goes LS.
All those crown vics, mustangs, and f150s have mod motors in them
>>17389778
Its impressive a v6 can even compete with a v8 in factory trim...

The new mustang was a failure in the US

>>17389747
REVS.

Making less torque and higher rpms is best for racing.

>>17389789
Be sure all you want doesn't make it true.

File: 1497231068416.jpg (53KB, 750x548px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 750x548px

>>17389713

File: Lt1.jpg (145KB, 1200x1440px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1200x1440px

>>17389838
What? The camaro is .5 seconds quicker to 60 and .7 quicker in the quarter mile

They both rev to 6,500 rpm
The chevy has over 400lbs of torque from 2,300 rpm to 6200 rpm
Mustang does not make 400lbs of torque and its torque curve is much more mid ended than the chevys

>>17389793
those are barely modulars. the design is rougly the same, but that's about it. don't fool yourself.

>>17390158
no, accufab ran 6.05 on a stock teksid block and stock crank, and ran 5.9 on a custom crank stock teksid block

File: IMG_9758.jpg (63KB, 552x430px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 552x430px

>>17389778
>v8
>slower than a v6
I am lmao'ing at ferdcucks

>>17389737
/thread
Krauts can't into engines

>>17389649
DOHC
O
H
C

>>17391451
Why did you bump this garbage thread?

File: IMG_0075.jpg (51KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 625x626px

>>17389649

>muh specific output meme
I thought this garbage died in the 90s.

Ford has so much confidence in their v8s they use them in endurance racing.. oh wait..