Name a better car. Pro-tip : You can't.

>>17385169
damn 3.3 sec is fast as fuck for a land barge like that

Only people I ever see drive AMG mercs are ~20 year old blondes

you'd think they give them out for free

>>17385169
Hmmm, I would also consider RS6 wagon. That baby looks bomb and sexy.

File: cp.jpg (84KB, 535x496px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 535x496px

The old M5 is a better car
Too bad it's discontinued

>>17385172
600bhp and enough torque to change the rotation of the earth helps.

>>17385169
v6 rav 4

>>17385169
German cars can not live up to their own hype.

>>17385169
>Pro-tip : You can't.
The estate/wagon version is better.

File: Jaguar-XJR-008.jpg (206KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 1024x683px

-uses manly superchargers instead of measly gay turbos
-bigger and can fit more people or luggage
-looks much better
-sounds much better
-loo reliability
-better interior layout

>>17385356
>tfw bongs and burgers are the only ones left using Super Chargers anymore

File: IMG_9905.jpg (631KB, 2400x1800px) Image search: [Google]

631KB, 2400x1800px

>>17385356
Based jaguar

File: jagxer.p08.jpg (29KB, 420x280px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 420x280px

>>17385368
vag likes them
they use really small ones though

>>17385509
fuck yeah

>>17385179
their oil rich middle eastern husbands literally do

File: 30t[1].jpg (122KB, 600x645px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 600x645px

>>17385368
Audi recently seems to have developed a bit of affection for superchargers, too. The current S4 and S5 use a supercharged V6 instead of an NA V8, and the new RS5 will most likely drop its NA V8 for a souped up version of the same supercharged 6 as well.

>>17385169
>Name a shit-post.
>Pro-tip : You can't.

>>17385744
are these v6s better than those horrid 4cyl tfsi units?

>>17385773
Apparently they're pretty solid, more reliable than the TIMING CHAIN GUIDES 4.2 anyway.

File: 1490699710931.jpg (71KB, 498x665px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 498x665px

>>17385169
>E-classes
>C-classes

That's my weakness.

>>17385185
>Heavier
>Less power
Still faster, how the hell bmw does it year after year?
Smaller tires too.

1996 Dodge Ram

>>17385848
sportier ...suspension?

>>17385848
superior suspension and steering breh
amg's are straight line cars with brute power in general while M cars focus more on handling rather than moar hp and moar liters

File: e63es_my17_1.jpg (119KB, 1180x528px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1180x528px

>>17385169
AMG E63 S Wagon

>>17385169
Why is it still called the E63 if it doesn't use the 6.3L anymore? Or did I have that wrong from the start?

File: 1496818391858.jpg (20KB, 250x310px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 250x310px

>>17385356
>>17385368
superchargers are trash

File: ss-4.jpg (462KB, 1200x846px) Image search: [Google]

462KB, 1200x846px

>>17385169
Chevy SS with a Whipple supercharger kit

>>17387141
I like btfoing GM but you are wrong here

>>17385169
Certainly not very good looking.

>>17385169

I really like that. It looks tame and professional, yet it can spank just about anything it comes across

>>17385848
>>17385876
>>17385956
bmw underrates hp. they've gone on record about being against the hp wars for a long time. a lot of bmws dyno near their crank rating.

File: cts-v.jpg (250KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 1600x900px

>muh burgerking

>>17387141
>t. tree hugger/weeb

>>17387961
This

Too bad it will be another 10 years until people take American cars seriously again thanks to the 80s-2000s

>>17387974
Stay mad turbos are superior

>>17385169
sand nigger trash

>>17385169
car for arabs with too much money and poor taste, not for white men

>>17385356
this

File: Screenshot_20170618-015940.png (917KB, 1423x897px) Image search: [Google]

917KB, 1423x897px

This

>>17385169
The 2018 M5 is gonna smoke this garbage.

>>17389155
My digits confirm.

>>17385169
jesus christ does that look like shit

>>17389192
the 2016 already smokes it