aston martin make the best looking c-
>posting the hybrid
>>17381823
>hating nature
lol
>>17381829
>hating yourself
>>17381829
>Hybrids good for nature
>>17382034
electrics are good for the environment.
Your autism prevents you from comprehending this.
>>17381843
LMAO A $100K 470hp COUPE THAT CAN'T RUN 12's
>>17382034
>thinks holes in the ground are comparable to the impact of fossil fuels
wew
>>17382159
You either have no idea what you're talking about, or you're retarded.
He was saying that all the rare metal open-earth mining necessary to manufacture the batteries required for EVs / hybrids (which, SPOILER ALERT: do not have useful lives long enough to justify them) is, in fact, worse for the environment than continuing to drive your old shitbox that gets <20 mpg. Additionally, if the rest of the manufacturing process and materials gathering, the logistics of moving a new vehicle, and the huge cost of making the necessary charging infrastructure as ubiquitous as gas stations Is taken into consideration, one might begin to realize that it's not nearly as good for the environment as you think.
>>17382241
Sure. And there's absolutely no opportunity costs to drilling hundreds of miles into the earth for liquified dead dinosaur, so that you can continue to drive YOUR old shitbox.
>>17382241
all of that is already factored in you braindead moron. Electric cars still pollute less.
>evs do not have long enough lives to justify them
except they do? after 50,000 miles they pollute over 50% less.
essentially you're just a retard who's talking out of his ass
>>17381804
OP is a fa-
NASA has found hydrocarbons on other celestial objects, so it will not be long until we admit that petroleum itself is abiotic.