What are your thoughts on Volvo S60 Polestar

That's what I'm saving up for, anon.

>>17363896
They are sleepers but great fun family oriented vehicles. Only issue is the price. As much as I love them 60k is prohibitive especially since they are most likely going to be daily driven. But I also live in the salt belt.

>>17363896
shitty modern car design. just buy an old s60r with a manual.

File: maxresdefault (1).jpg (84KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1280x720px

>>17363976
>i'm retarded
the post. boomers need to fucking die already

File: 546b52fa6658a_-_volvo-s60-r-lg.jpg (39KB, 565x315px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 565x315px

>>17364017
the pedestrian-safe front end and tiny windows and high beltline kill it.

Vastly overpriced.

But m3... why

>>17363896
10k too expensive. v60 also seems a little more my taste since its kinda like a half-hatch half-wagon.

>>17364024
I saw one of these and thought it was some regular old volvo untill i heard it accelerate and drove by and saw the r and awd badge now i sorta want one ultimate sleeper

>>17364170
The v60 seems way better then the s60

>>17364206
They're not really all that different, but I just prefer the v60 a little more. There's also some extra headroom for the backseat due to the car's slope, so that's an extra plus.

t. someone who tested both cars

>>17363896
I like it, but the newer Volvo's aren't cheap. If I could afford one I really would buy one, except it would be a V60 instead of a s60. Or maybe a V40.