Civic Type R

File: x34lqa7n8bwy.jpg (216KB, 1620x1080px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 1620x1080px

>>17341544
good from the front
bad from the back (why im not buying it)

my opinion depends on its price? whats does it cost?
is it auto or a flappy paddle?
how heavy is it?

File: 1493133112701.jpg (60KB, 509x720px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 509x720px

>>17341544
>Fwd
>35k

>306hp
>295lb-ft
>2910lbs

That's actually quite respectable. Higher power to weight than a 5.7L Challenger, amusingly. The Burgerking time can't be argued with, it's definitely fast. I also like the interior of it. The exterior is so bad it's good, the rice is taken to comical levels I almost respect. Honda at least put some effort into it.

Still, would never buy one because I've already owned enough FWD 4cyl cars and want more cylinders.

>>17341599
>is it auto or a flappy paddle?
neither

>>17341611
...this

>>17341622
unimpressive when you compare to the standard mustang ecoboost. Same specs more or less and for almost 10k less starting price? Jesus man this is a no brainer

>>17341544
The competition in this class is awd these days. Why isnt the ctr?

>>17341544
Its primary market (kids/20 somethings) dont have the money to afford it

>>17341544

Sad. Very sad. Grow up. Get a job.

>>17341544
Literally my dream car. So fucking ugly and weird that it's actually good looking.

Ugly as fuck.

>>17341821
Ecostang is literally 600lbs heavier and is undoubtedly slower around corners. If you want a Mustang, V8 or nothing.