VTEC vs Rotary

File: 20170417_154136.jpg (3MB, 4032x2268px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x2268px

>>17331103

>>17331067
Without a doubt rotary. The moment you mention their engines are unreliable pos, they sperg like no tomorrow.

>>17331194
dude
a rotary engine harnesses more power
because the underlying mechanism, rotation, is
much more efficient and smooth than the reciprocating piston engine

>>17331213
Who are you quoting?

File: 1479705368354.png (446KB, 790x800px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 790x800px

>>17331213
>>17331215
sperg more rotards

File: 1486581269316.jpg (416KB, 1360x2048px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 1360x2048px

>>17331244
modern rotor tips last much longer than piston rings and allow you to enjoy the smooth rotary motion without all that vibration

>>17331067
"Although the 787 and 787B lacked the single lap pace of World Championship competitors such as Mercedes-Benz, Jaguar, and Porsche, as well as Japanese Championship competitors Nissan and Toyota, the Mazdas had reliability which allowed them to contend for their respective championships. The reliability of the cars eventually paid off in 1991 when a 787B driven by Johnny Herbert, Volker Weidler, and Bertrand Gachot went on to victory in the 1991 24 Hours of Le Mans. This remains as of 2016 the only victory by a Japanese marque as well as the only victory by a car not using a reciprocating engine design."

>TLDR: kys op read a book nigger
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mazda_787B

File: Sinister laughter.jpg (480KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

480KB, 800x600px

>>17331067
Definitely not the ones who can go this fast with only a small amount of work put in.

>>17331294
Haha never seen this image before.

File: 1486479951957.jpg (58KB, 566x480px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 566x480px

>>17331260
Here's your image

>>17331259
What car can I buy that has these modern rotor tips?

>>17331259
So, they can last almost 480k kms...like my 4.3 Vortec???
I don't believe that...