Trying to decide on a car to buy

If you're genuinely considering the Veloster, your mother should have aborted you

>>17315672
Stfu faggot
>>17315665
Non turbo velosters are fine, just don't expect to go fast. Crz will probably last longer though.

>>17315685
>basically posts why OP shouldn't consider a Veloster (agreeing with me)
>OMG STFU FAGGOT DONT INSULT MY BOYFRIEND
Ok cumsock

>>17315685
Yeah I'm not too hellbent on speed, I just need it to last long yet the CRZ isn't as spacious as the molester

File: TOTAL MELTDOWN.jpg (108KB, 936x400px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 936x400px

>>17315693
lmao look at this loser having a meltdown

File: IMG_20170530_075643_826.jpg (4MB, 3617x2182px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3617x2182px

Go Turbo
200hp on a 6speed manual provides fun for a DD
Car is light and responsive only weights 2790lbs
And if you care about gas it gets about 27mpg average

Also vrooooom pshhhhh

Overall I like my DD turbo veloster, it seriously won me over like a shelter dog who loves you But is kinda ugly

Fuck u and the velosturd

File: BsDLF4cIAAAyuMf.jpg (32KB, 481x481px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 481x481px

>>17315838
another day, another loser having a meltdown.

>>17315665
>gookshit
The Veloster is just a "quirky" commuter car with shit visibility. Turbo ones aren't particularly quick to begin with, and the NA ones are slow. Given its performance and function a Corolla would be a better option. May or may not be faster than the CR-Z, but it probably feels shit compared to.

The CR-Z is at least an attempt by Honda to make a modern CRX. Good fuel mileage, but that's about it. Again, not fast. You'd be better off just getting a CRX.

>>17315665
Get a civic for 3k or fix your current car.