DTS

Overall not really. It's value will just continue to fall. But from a driving standpoint it's the last of the classical fwd V8 Cadillacs they were known for decades. It'll provide a driving experience no other car can provide

Caddys depreciate like crazy, more than most other cars

the DTS is not really a desirable caddy

>>17290869
>inherited a meticulously maintained modern American luxury landyacht completely for free

Sell it.

>>17290869
>>17290909
90s Cadillac and Northstar engines are my fetish so id buy it directly from you if i could.

My grand father had a Deville with well over 200,000+ miles on it until the digital instrument cluster went out and he just got another car. i don't know if it could've been replaced or not or for how much. kinda wish he kept it and tried to have it fixed since it was still a running car.

Thanks for the input guys I'll check the thread in the morning to see who else chimes in.

File: 1111.jpg (723KB, 2562x1755px) Image search: [Google]

723KB, 2562x1755px

>>17290940
>Northstar
Yuck.

File: Shelby_Series_1_36.jpg (1MB, 3297x2201px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3297x2201px

>>17290952
It had its moments.

>>17290869
If it was an Eldorado, it would be worth keeping. DTS, probably not, unless you really love the car.

>>17290952
North star was okay post 2001 but I agree anything before that you should stick with 4.9/5

>>17291210
They never actually fixed the headbolt issue in 2000. Just kept making them longer. Considering You'll need a stud kit eventually regardless, 96-99 are the best. 93-95 were working out the kinks and post 2000 dropped compression to run on 87 and try to reduce hg woes. The older cars have a lot more punch than the later models.