Should I buy it?
honestly?
its more jeepy than most jeeps right now
>>17285984
It's not a "Jeep". If you're going to buy a money pit, you might as well get something that looks good and can fulfill it's function. These are just "rugged" SUV's for a 40 year old wife to bully her husband into buying because she doesn't like the look of a wrangler.
>>17285984
>Buying a cheap Italian car
Gee anon, I don't know if you should or shouldn't
>>17285984
>considering a crossover
consider suicide.
>>17285984
its ugly as fuck. car worthy of being in offroad division of hair dresser army
Any jeep or heap of shit released past January 1st of 2014 is not a jeep it is a Fiat or Fagot (spelled incorrectly I know). The Jeep Renegade was released in March of 2014 so no do not buy that small Italian piece of trash. Also a real man doesn't drive a Jeep SUV crossover.
Looks better than the current Wrangler. That's not saying much.
No. These things have car suspension, they're no more off-road capable than an average sedan. At least the Wrangler is more capable off-road in factory new config, and Chrysler actually has options to support it, like the electronically disconnecting sway bars and an actual low range. I don't think they have factory lockers.
Buy a 90s jeep wrangler for cheaper and upgrade it, its a much better car
>>17285984
Those things have plastic brake lines. I would just kill myself if i ever even considered buying that shill wagon.
>>17288056
>plastic brake lines
You're aware that all cars have rubber flexible brake hoses right? Rubber is a type of plastic unless it's natural rubber (which its not).
Are you mental? They are beyond slow interiors are almost as bad as the compass if you want a jeep get a grand cherokee or a wrangler
>>17285984
>Buying a Fiat 500X with a Jeep bodykit
Do it if you want, but just for a notice of warning, you will most likely run into a lot of issues. Being a FCA vehicle, it's to be expected.