>tfw no 1985 chevy suburban

File: $_20.jpg (81KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 800x600px

>tfw no 1990 Ford Maverick

>>17240057
I remember these cars making a distinct sound.

something like DIGGADIGGADIGGADIGGADIGGADIGGA I've never seen one that clean close up. all the ones I've seen were worn out paint chipped rusty as fuck absolute shitboxes. seem like the perfect mad max truck since they'd probably rust into dust before they stopped running. that's the impression my neighbor's gave me before he got a newer truck.

I remember when I was a kid if your family had one you were a rich fag

>>17240163
Kinda hard to imagine these were ever expensive vehicles for the middle class. whenever i saw one growing up (late 90s kid) it was usually owned by the poorest nigger.

File: amc eagle.jpg (76KB, 624x351px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 624x351px

>tfw no 1987 AMC Eagle

File: 2017-04-24_18.55.15.jpg (165KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 960x1280px

>>17240185
There wefe pretty expensive when new. Couple years ago i bought a 94 k1500. Fully loaded from the original owner. 145k miles i think when i got it. Payed $2000.

>>17240202
Saw one a week ago, couldn't believe how clean it was considering I'm in Chicago. Was thinkg about asking a price, but then I talked to the owner and it had 17k miles. Amazing car, but not worth the money he probably wanted

>>17241726
You should have asked for a price anyway. Those things are impossible to find in good condition.

>>17240185
Poorest of poor niggers weren't driving 90s Suburbans in the 90s. They might have been driving 70s Suburbans in the 90s.

File: 1395028131288.png (139KB, 658x752px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 658x752px

>>17240057
Shit.. My uncle has an '85 Suburban 2500 that he barely uses and I want to buy it from him but he loves it so much that I don't think he'll sell it

>>17240163
can confirm upper middle class
drove the thing down to florida from ny every summer
>that mpg

File: 1.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

>>17240057
Don't need something so big. Went with its smaller brother.
>1988 S10 Blazer

File: 1986-bronco-xlt-58-liter-4v-ho-c-6-trans-pristine-survivor-last-year-3rd-gen-1.jpg (78KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 640x480px

>>17242125
disgusting. at least get a bronco.

File: Screen-Shot-2017-03-20-at-11.43.09-AM.png (811KB, 890x524px) Image search: [Google]

811KB, 890x524px

>>17242144
Don't want a Bronco. You get one.

>>17242158
I think I will

File: 1491880675865.gif (187KB, 192x192px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 192x192px

>>17242187
So until you get back to me with one I won't take your suggestion seriously. God speed.

File: 1986-Ford-Bronco.jpg (331KB, 2146x1677px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 2146x1677px

>>17242191
okay here ya go, just picked it up 5 minutes ago

File: 1368902592231.jpg (48KB, 535x577px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 535x577px

>>17242225
O-oh, you're right...I...I've been such a fool...

File: 635801502824964966-475885548_tumblr_nno5o6P1oJ1urlc5jo1_500.png (124KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 500x333px

>>17242230
it'll be okay anon

>>17242233
But professional memes aside, what was the problem with the S10? I've honestly never caught on to the interest in Broncos besides how common they are.

>>17242348
Not Bronco guy but they just both fulfilled the same role and even all the chevy guys in my area had Bronco's at some point.

>>17242348
I have an s10, best thing I could own for it's use.

>>17242348
>what was the problem with the S10?
nothing, the Bronco just looks better in every way

File: 1482355483251.png (16KB, 300x820px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 300x820px

>>17242410
If you say so.

>>17242348
S10 is garbage quality.
I'm not even bashing GM here. Plenty of their vehicles are fine. But the S10 series is utter crap.

There's a reason that today you'll find 10 broncos for every blazer on the road and 20 rangers for every S10 pickup.
S10 series just didn't hold up.

File: nods holistically towards you.png (225KB, 449x319px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 449x319px

>>17242144
>tfw my DD is a 92 Eddie Bauer ed. Bronco

File: 957429bfad6f07375cd927347417cb43.jpg (38KB, 564x306px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 564x306px

>TFW no Australian Police Burban

>>17242601
N I C E

>>17242589
It's the opposite around here. I've only seen a handful of Broncos, while S10s are as common as civics.

>>17242125
WANT

>>17242144
>>17242225
>>17242601
that feel when no big block 78 bronco with a four speed

>>17242946
this feel is a real feel indeed

File: Screenshot_NormalAppImage(2).png (908KB, 1033x740px) Image search: [Google]

908KB, 1033x740px

>TFW no emergency communications Suburban

File: ic2tzc.jpg (240KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 1600x1200px

>tfw no suburban 5.3 swapped into my turd gen

>>17242410
But not better than the silverado blazers

File: 1446782666240.jpg (18KB, 250x284px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 250x284px

>tfw no 8.1 vortec suburban

Tfw no JA60 QX56. Best SUV that ever existed.

File: 1492744804383.png (260KB, 593x635px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 593x635px

>>17246109
>best suv

>>17246000
Would rather an 8.1 avalanche. Top comfy

>>17246125
Forgot those existed

File: lingenfelter-gmc-suburban-photo-357998-s-1280x782.jpg (130KB, 1280x782px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1280x782px

>tfw no 9.9L Lingenfelter Suburban

>>17246602
Its wierd how little information there is about those. Hardly any photos of them as well.