>overtakes you

Ok, I'm not in a hurry.

>Jizz immediately as the sight of it enters my peripheral
>Stop the car to clean my pants again

gonna be late for work

oh cool someone has the new civic

>>17236552
tfw want a type r but i know dealers are gonna charge ass rape prices if it's even possible to find one

>>17236552
Punches you on the throat

>>17236698
NIGGER

>>17236698
I just want a light RWD Honda. One with literally 130 horsepower would make me happy. fuck me right?

>>17236552
Some kid and his friend pulled up to me in one of these yesterday with their windows half way down of course blasting music. They of course revved the shit as loud as they could and dropped the clutch when the light turned green. Looked like a bunch of rich college kid fags

>>17236552
Why does it look so big?
I though it was supposed to be a hatchback yet it looks like a slammed SUV?Crossover.

>>17236722
looks can be deceiving grandpa let the kids have fun

ALIEN INVASION!

>>17236716
S660

Ok.

>>17236798
surely Trump will make imports great again

File: 1493145394667.png (74KB, 260x263px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 260x263px

>SI has been on sale for a week
>STILL no driving impressions
>literally NONE

>>17236798
he said 130 not 63

>>17236722
at the end of day, it is Civic.
not suprised

>>17236971
If it were to be exported it would have a Turbo 1 litre

>>17236722
It's not out yet you asswipe.

>>17236958
May 13th was a bullshit marketing launch. Si sedans are arriving first week of June, coupes first week of July. Si media drive is may 24th with an NDA till June 6th. Yeah it's bullshit. Honda knows it's slow and have fucked the only two redeemable features it had going for it. That being the K series motor being replaced by base model trash, and the new Civic's shifter is considered the worst Honda manual ever made.

File: imageshandler.jpg (51KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 640x480px

>>17236716
why not one with 240hp

>>17237082
The regular Civic with a Turbo and CVT is faster than the old Si

>>17237091
Makes no torque and burns oil like a rotary

>>17237096
Who needs torque when you can rev to 9k

>>17237082
Isn't the 6mt in the Si supposed to be ""short throw"" compared to the regular civic 6mt?

>>17237096
>burns oil like a rotary
half as much at most on a high mileage motor you fucking memer

>>17236552
>think huh neat and go about my day

>>17237102
Someone who actually needs to drive places in traffic every day

>>17237102
uh that's not how it works retard

>>17237102
Who needs to rev to 9k rpm when you have torque?

File: 1431239996940.jpg (69KB, 920x380px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 920x380px

>>17237112
>>17237113
>>17237120
>T. assmad Diesel driver

>>17237112
1-5k has all the power you will ever need for daily driving

>>17237134
If you've actually driven an S2000 you'd know that's wrong

File: 1494089036493.png (280KB, 646x595px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 646x595px

so im about to buy a 2017 golf R. should i rather wait for this to come out and try it ? It cant be better than a golf R r-right ?

>>17237145
golf R is better

>>17237145
>golf
how does it feel to literally own the same car as 30% of the driving population of the western world?

>>17237142
I dd one.

>>17237145
A Golf is an excellent girls car, sweety :)

>>17237155
You did one what?

>>17237145
Type R is better

>Volkswagen
Jesus christ its fucking 2017 not 1960

>>17236552

>Bloated
>5 Doors

Yuck.

>>17237152
>>17237161
>>17237164

g-guys please stop... 300 HP AWD must be better than 300 FWD and the golf is highly tuneable.

File: IMG_5870.jpg (1023KB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1023KB, 3264x2448px

>>17237162

>>17237145
I love the golf r, but for the price they charge you you can get something flashier (all golfs look the same desu)

Have you looked into the scirocco r for instance?

>>17237180
Are you like notamiata and skipped school for an entire year to save up and sperge out your entire savings on an S2000?

>>17237181
i dont like the rear end of the scirocco and 42k Euro for a fully loaded 2017 Golf R doesnt seem to bad. How much would be a fully loaded Type R ?

>>17237177
>Type R
That's the only performance badge you will ever need. Type R's have always delivered.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DH1iE817gB4

>>17237094
Funny how this implies that having a CVT and generic econobox engine that makes it accelerate faster means it's better. The new Si is literally the base car with a tune and that's what makes it sad.

>>17237107
Not confirmed. Si has a different part # for only the shift cable and shift assembly (unconfirmed if this is unique or borrowed from another Honda). A few reviewers from the NYIAS have been quoted as saying it feels exactly the same as the base car a few feet away.

File: jms-scirocco-04.jpg (1000KB, 3000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

1000KB, 3000x2000px

>>17237191
Rear looks THICC

But yeah, type r is also a good choice in the category. Just think it looks too rice

>>17237200
You're wrong though, the Si uses suspension parts from the Type R

>>17237145
>golf R
why? you have a lot of options at that price range, why get a fucking golf, because auto rags have been shilling them?

>>17237209
okey lets see. I want a hot hatch:

>focus RS - shit daily driver
>Audi rs3/s4 - to expensive / literally a golf
>merc A45 amg - to expensive
>honda type R - 300 ps FWD = ends in crash in wet weather

so golf R seems like the only choice

>>17237236
Don't listen to this guy

>Volkswagen

>>17237205
The only part borrowed from the Type R are the front upper control arms. The Si does have adaptive dampers, but no one has any idea if it even does anything of merit.

>>17237236
Literally all cars you listed are better
I'd get a used m3 for that money

>>17237236
Golf R is definitely better

>>17237288
>haldex

>>17237292
Civic Type R is FWD

>>17237236
>hot hatch
it's a 4 door car. literally a sedan with a flattened ass, or a short wagon.

just get a wrx sti, faggot.

File: 1493495336570.jpg (10KB, 250x246px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 250x246px

>>17237145
The way I look at it, the Golf R is better looking, and AWD will probably give faster 0 - 60 and better traction on frozen/wet roads.

But the Type R has nip reliability as opposed to vag meme reliability, is lighter, and overall faster and sportier by any metric outside of 0 - 60.

Personally I'd just go for a Fiat 500 Abarth and keep the savings for tony's repairs.

>>17237236
>Poweful front wheel drive cars are especially dangerous to drive in the rain

What

>>17237145
the rs btfos both options

>>17237145
>Golf R

Nice but boring. Looks the same as a base Golf with a tiny little R badge on it. Any self respecting boy racer would take the Type R or Focus RS.

File: 1485537831686.jpg (11KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 236x236px

>>17237204
>dat rear end

now that's a hatch I would like to drive

>>17237189

>get called out
>immediately send goalposts flying and sperg harder


Good job retard

>>17236552
I'll slow down so I don't have to look at it's uggly ass any longer than needed.

File: honda-civic-type-r-web-exclsuive-0025.jpg (70KB, 900x596px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 900x596px

>>17236552
eh....

File: DSC_3382[1].jpg (862KB, 1200x803px) Image search: [Google]

862KB, 1200x803px

>>17237192
>Type R's have always delivered
*blocks your path*

>>17237031
waiting for that to happen

>>17237108
still a bit worst than Honda K engines, ive heard.

File: 151109135418-coroners-americas-busist-lisa-ling-orig-00004219-full-169.jpg (190KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1600x900px

>undertakes you

>>17236563
I thought child labor was illegal.

>>17236552
>*teleports behind u*
oh wait

File: 3 door type r.png (386KB, 901x594px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 901x594px

>>17237577
i tried

File: importbeatsmuscle.jpg (419KB, 1402x858px) Image search: [Google]

419KB, 1402x858px

>>17237508

>>17237091
>Honda revives the S2000 in 2020
>it's a CVT

>>17237567
>m-muh S2000 is totally a good daily driver! Honestly guise! It's not like I've never driven anything else

>>17237868
Plenty of people daily drive an S2000.
>It's not like I've never driven anything else
I see you can't think of anything bad to say about the car.

>>17236552
>>17237577
>civic type buru sti

>>17237892
Other than the fact that it's a torques shitbox? Nah

Have fun redlining just to over take a minivan

>>17238142
>Have fun redlining

Thanks man, I will.

>>17238142
>Have fun redlining just to over take a minivan
I have lots of fun in my car.

Why are you so hostile?

Why didn't Honda take their old 2.4l engine from the 2015 civic si and put a turbo on it?

If the emissions are an issue why didn't Honda take their more powerful 2.0l engine and put a turbo on it?

Why did they take the shitty 1.5l Honda fit engine and put a turbo on it?

>>17238215
memes

>>17237236
>FWD = ends in crash in wet weather
Where do you retards get this shit?

>>17238215
Because fuel economy and emissions

The 1.5l can still easily be tuned to makes tons of power

>>17238237
Not really. Honda already made their 2.0l which would generate way more power

The dinky 1.5l was a joke on the regular civics

A civic ex comes with the 1.4l with a turbo making 190hp. This new engine is only 100cc bigger for a little extra power.

>tuning

This car is brand new you aren't gonna void your warranty by fucking with the ecu

>>17236552
>N-nice Panamera bro

>>17238250
And tons of more emissions, old engine

When did they have a turbo 1.4l? Must be a euro thing or something

>>17238250
Anon, the """regular""" civics use a NA 2.0l, it's the EX-T and up that use the 1.5l turbo.

Though I agree that imo they should've just grabbed the 2.0 from the base civic and thrown a turbo on it.

>>17238269
>When did they have a turbo 1.4l?
The regular civics use the 1.4 liter Honda fit engine and they jumped the power and torque with a turbo

>>17238296
>it's the EX-T and up that use the 1.5l turbo.
Yes I said that

The civic si uses a 1.5l with a turbo. Same as the regular civic ex

>>17238304
The EX uses the NA 2.0l, it's only EX-T and up that use the 1.5l.

>>17238305
I see. I thought only the lx came with the 2.0 and the ex had the turbo 1.5

>>17236552
Wtf is that ugly hunk of shit.

>>17238318
For some retarded reason they have both EX and EX-T trims now. imo they had it right with DX < LX < EX

File: hd coffee frog.png (2MB, 7200x6000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 7200x6000px

>mfw a base lx with a tune ends up making more power than an si after a tune

>>17237236
how is the focus a bad DD? I haven't talked to to many people about the focus specifically, but I've heard the fiesta is a really good DD and they're basically the same

>>17238360
Not the Focus, the Focus RS. The ride is supposedly extremely punishing even by "sporty" standards.

>crashes in the woods

>>17238300
The current gen Civics? They also use the new 1.5l Turbos and are an upgrade for the base model 2.0l naturally aspirated engine

File: what.png (162KB, 326x359px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 326x359px

>>17237577
I just dont get what all this means?
im 18 years old so this car isnt too modern for me
When i was a kid older vehicles /classics/ looked funny cause how simple they were

ive grown up and see this new trend to be over designed, there's just too much going on, even people my age agree it looks riced

is this because the designers are just getting old? and they need to hire new generaiton of designers ?

i just dont understand what im looking at when i see the rear

4 C Y L I N D E R S
C
Y
L
I
N
D
E
R
S

I just hope it's big enough for a tall guy.

>>17236552
I have a Hellcat so this little fuckboy ricer is going to get its shit pushed in...until it turns and then leaves me in dust.

>>17240105
>hellcat

you wont be beating anyone when you are busy on the side of the road broken down

and even if luck is on your side and your shitbox is working you will lose on the first corner anyways

>>17240114
>you are busy on the side of the road broken down
Where does this meme come from? I have launch edition with 35k miles and I haven't had a single issue other than people making fun of me.

>>17240114
>still thinking a Hellcat is a track car
Let it go man. We get it, you don't like FCA.

File: image.jpg (93KB, 800x532px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 800x532px

>>17240122
>haven't had a single issue other than people making fun of me

I don't know why I find this so funny.

>>17236552
I got a 66 Nova SS that weight 2,800lbs and makes 900+hp that says otherwise sunshine.

>>17236747
Because people don't want us to enjoy things.

>>17237031
We can dream... But in the end it's still just a dream.

>>17237175
2-3 or nothing for me!

>>17237686
It was a good try bro...

>>17237102
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04l2YtEO1Xc

really makes you think

>>17236552
Still waiting on my 2018 Honda Accord Turbo to come out later this year.

>>17236552
laugh as I watch the cop take you down so I can continue on in safety THANKS RICER!

File: 1280px-BMW_M5_E28_US.jpg (159KB, 1280x565px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 1280x565px

>>17239949

I'm 19 and I agree with you, I think automakers fear their designs might look too boring, so to compensate they just over design the shit out of it hoping it'll catch on and deliver, but this is literally the ugliest Civic to be released. It really does look like shit.

File: TORQUES.png (346KB, 573x446px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 573x446px

>>17237120
y-yeah i dont need to go over 1k rpms, m-muh torques. id'll pull a house down boy.

>>17237175
5 doors is best. Unless it's a golf.

File: Mercedes-Benz_A_45_AMG_(MSP16).jpg (2MB, 5456x3632px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5456x3632px

>>17239949
>>17241152

It's fairly simple, until the 80s the cheap, get to go, sport cars were the roadsters, they were tiny vehicles but they still had the curves and the form of a proper racing machine.

Then the "hot hatch" appeared, which were far more practical and cheaper, notably the 205 GTI and the Golf (Mk2) GTI, both of them absolutely destroyed roadsters market which never really recovered (today roadsters are just the cars of 30 something childless women, fags and collectors while they used to be the ones of sunday's racers).

The main problem with hot hatch is that they are still hatchbacks, in consequence they look quintessentially non sporty, that's why some designers (not all) try to compensate so hard.