Why does /o/ hate/ignore lancers?

>>17225707
Because the only lancers worth a shit are evos, which are way out of o's price range

>>17225707
I want a Lancer ;_;

>>17225716
Why don't more people just turbo regular lancers?

>>17225729
Because the motors, transmissions, and drivetrain are shit compared to the Evo. Even the unibody is weaker. It's literally a forgettable commuter car, except it isn't an engine swap away from being passable like the old Hondas.

>>17225729
Because the only redeeming feature of an evo is the drive train, without that you would be better off turning a civic

File: 0652b051f45ad87a9298bdf7a96ab98e.png (152KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 420x420px

>shitsubishi anything

I seriously thought Mitsubishi just went under or something.

File: 1320606785940.jpg (74KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 600x450px

Every time I see a lancer I immediately assume it's a contrarian who wanted an Impreza but didn't want to get one because too many other people have one.

>>17225707
I don't hate them to be fair, I'm looking at one for sale and the only thing holding me back is the shitty, hard plastic, basic, interior

>2012 Mitsubishi Lancer Es
>2L n/a
>Fwd
>148 hp
>145 ft./lb. torque
>manual
>46k miles
>$7k

Im not the average fagg/o/t that needs at least 300hp to be able to merge onto the highway

There's nothing too bad about them as a commuter car. They are pretty cool looking econoboxes in my opinion. Mitsubishi let the current model stagnate for a decade though. It would be nice if they decided to update them but they probably won't.

>>17226484
instead of updating it Mitsubishi is killing the Lancer now too.

>>17225707
Because it's a piece of shit that's only remembered for the Evo.

>>17225707
Because it's been unchanged for 10 years and it's worse than a 3k civic.