What does /o/ think of the V6 Challenger?

File: 2diDMq4.jpg (12KB, 284x284px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 284x284px

my neighbor has one of the newer ones

it sounds really cool actually.

I wouldn't mind one as a daily. because even with the v8 it's pigfat and slow. Might aswell save some money and have a comfier car due to the lack of the v8 in the front.

Does the same person keep posting these "what do you think about V6 [insert muscle car]?" threads?

File: IMG_0518.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>17220221
Comfy as fuck and better than I expected on gas

It was a rental I had in California

File: IMG_0532.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>17220303
definitely not bad for a V6 boat with an 8 speed auto

>>17220221
I wouldn't know. After all the problems i've had with Chrysler products, I stay far away from them.

I dont

Apparently the V6 isn't all THAT gutless, I mean the current V6 pushes out the same numbers the BMW M70B50 V12 does.
The older SOHC V6 alao pushed out some 250 or so HP. Sure it ain't holding a candle next to even the base 5.7 V8 but it isn't completely hopeless.
Only problem I see is them being slow as shit, which gives the ricers something to gloat about how they beat a "1500hp twin nitro turbo V12 Challenger" because the Challenger is a heavy piece of shit.

Now that I think about it, the V6 makes more sense in the Charger than the Challenger.

>>17220221
A slowish, comfy mile eater that's good on gas

Doesnt it have the sbility to halt 2 cylinders to save gas?
I know the v8 does this. My brothers boss has a srt8 charger and only consumes 11 litres on city driving

>>17220221
I sold Adderall to a girl who drove one when I was in high school. I think that about sums it up.

>>17220849
>degenerate drug dealers sticking their noses up at other people

topkek m8