Why are card getting UGLIER every year?

File: 2017-chevrolet-malibu-engine-specs-1.jpg (240KB, 960x800px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 960x800px

>>17190307
LOOK AT THIS MONSTROSITY

>>17190310
Gorgeous desu

>>17190307
Federal safety standards mandate big front and rear ends because they're less likely to break a passenger's legs if they inadvertently get run over. Also thick pillars for side airbags and >muh rollover protection and squeezing the last bit of aerodynamics out of a lumbering brick for >muh fuel economy. My rule of thumb is to never buy a car made after 2008.

File: DSC05551.sized.jpg (158KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 640x480px

desu, the 90s was the last hurrah

>>17190307
You best not be hatin on 7th gen malibus bro. You gun get rekt.

>>17190758
it looks like shit irl m8.

>>17190307
>my dream car Malibu
wow anon sad life huh?

>>17190762
>they're less likely to break a passenger's legs if they inadvertently get run over

pedestrian's

hobo's

Federal safety standards don't matter. State makes me install a sharp sheet metal blade on my front bumper (license plate). So we'll just slice your legs off.

File: image-167563.jpg (109KB, 797x1200px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 797x1200px

>>17191046
>Become real estate agent
>Dad buys car and says pay him back
>Make no money
>Have to sell car

I will some day pay my dad back and still buy a Malibu. But they keep making them uglier I don't even know.

>my dream car Malibu

How can we take anything you say seriously after this?

>>17192540
see >>17192515

>>17192515
Girl on the right?

File: pic1.jpg (126KB, 500x750px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 500x750px

>>17193088
Tiffany Mynx

>>17190310
this looks a whole lot better

>>17190307
you get uglier every year

File: lingerie-girls-032.jpg (570KB, 1280x1920px) Image search: [Google]

570KB, 1280x1920px

>>17193182
Eat shit

>>17190310
You gotta be a retarded blind chimp to think the 2012 one looks better

I just don't like they all look the same. I know it's the safety regulations and everything, but they all look the same.

I can't fuckin' stand it anymore, man. It's making me legit depressed. I'm not even talking about like, the ford fusion looks like the lincoln. I'm talkin' look at this picture here: >>17190310

Ignore or block out the badge with your thumb. Honestly ask yourself, is it a toyota? Is it a hyundai? kia? ford? buick? chevy? mazda? nissan?

I know, I know, some memelord will say something, but seriously. They're all the same.

>>17192515

I wonder what it's like to be an old, washed up hoe, but your body is still tight enough that you can do MILF porn. You know that you're not as attractive as you used to be, but your ego can't handle it. I wonder what the suicide rate is for these women when they leave the industry.

File: s500vss660.jpg (316KB, 1919x1283px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1919x1283px

>>17193729

the worst part is

you are right man

which one would you choose of pic related, this is all mainly because normies are fucking stupid and need coddling and infotainment

>>17194046
>shitty little motorcycle engined death trap
>modern kei sports car

well I know Id take the S660 any day of the week

>>17193941
>women
>successful suicide

>>17194054

>why do cars LOOK uglier

>let me talk about 40 years of development in automotive engineering instead

lil spergy here mate, change is not automatically good

>>17194074
>which one would you choose of pic related
>goes retarded when someone answers

chill out autist

they changed for the better objectively and thats what matters

>>17194083

true style is subjective, but i would rather have the one without swathes of plastic, bizarrely aggressive stance and cucky modern engine management and unnecessary pigfat

i'm not sure driving fun is objective either, maybe it's better on fuel economy or something but this is a sportscar so why bother with that

what did change to be better 'objectively'? crash safety?

>>17194111
its better in every objective measure

so why do you bring up subjective garbage?

File: qx80.jpg (140KB, 800x489px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 800x489px

It literally looks like a parody of bloated modern cars

File: alexjones2.png (396KB, 495x303px) Image search: [Google]

396KB, 495x303px

>>17194128

because the thread is about subjective criteria, in this case does the car loom better?

i'm sure the modern car is also worse in some 'objective' ways, e.g. being heavier, more expensive, more complex etc. but it's swings and roundabouts

File: 49711_04big.jpg (188KB, 680x1024px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 680x1024px

>>17193177
Muh angry lights
Muh thick hood

>>17194588
why you keep posting old hags

no wonder you like a bland blob

File: anrihit0mi.jpg (68KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 600x800px

>>17194625
>Not liking milfs
It's almost as if you're gay.

File: tumblr_m4fdmk10y31qk9l6xo1_500.jpg (108KB, 500x573px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 500x573px

>>17195049
i will take a cute boipussy over an old hag any day

cars arent getting uglier you just have horrible taste

File: 69 malibu.jpg (117KB, 1000x531px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1000x531px

>>17191046
>hating on the malibu

>>17195139
gas yourself faggot

>>17194588

imagine finding this attractive

File: just as foretold by the prophecy.png (2MB, 1215x1365px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1215x1365px

>>17194149
...I can't tell if this is one of /o/'s photoshops or not.

File: tmp_22392-Screenshot_2017-05-13-00-59-461306785610.png (331KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 720x1280px

>witty one liner

>>17195183
fuck off homophobe

>>17190996
2001 was when most good looking cars died as well