Post trash

File: o auto i have absolutely no clue what any of these cars are they're probably all shit.png (53KB, 555x126px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 555x126px

>>17184897

File: 1493781342961.jpg (45KB, 620x400px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 620x400px

>>17184897

Any car I don't like.

OP's car.

File: IMG_0326.png (1MB, 1865x1220px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1865x1220px

Done

File: m3 vs giulia.jpg (110KB, 980x406px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 980x406px

>>17185500
>>17184897
>insecure FCA cucks detected

Oh good, another quality thread.

>>17184897
Any vehicle OP likes.

>>17185751
Jokes on you I ride a bus

File: 1494470991376[1].jpg (352KB, 1920x1039px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 1920x1039px

>>17184897

File: bmw sucks.png (172KB, 871x808px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 871x808px

>>17184897

>>17185848
What special kind of retard made this?
So a good sounding engine is automatically good?

File: 1493501478322.jpg (455KB, 2048x1315px) Image search: [Google]

455KB, 2048x1315px

>>17185876
this is an empirical fact you low IQ fuck

>>17185889
an empirical fact is that you're a 16 year old carthrottle tier retard
the best sounding engines were produced before the age turbos but those engines are obsolete shit by todays standards
kys fca cuck

File: 1494468345488.jpg (7KB, 192x250px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 192x250px

>>17185896

t. bmw kike

you have to go back

>>17185904
t.16 year old busrider
not even worth adding an image

>>17184897
>be BMW
>offer more expensive competitor to FCA that is higher quality and won't break down nearly as often
>everyone thinks it's shit because it's 1/100th of a picosecond slower

>>17185921
>more expensive
lmao the M3 costs nearly $10k less than the Giulia QV while having a good interior and actual pedigree.

File: 13307881970998.png (93KB, 309x264px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 309x264px

>>17185906
Enjoy your low reliability and highest in class depreciation

There is a reason trash like (((BMW))) is 1% market share

Dead. Shit. Brand.

File: IMG_2913.png (101KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 750x1334px

>>17185933
>1%
Lmao troll harder cuck
also
>BMW has been the top selling luxury car maker in the US for the last 10 consecutive years

>>17185932
I stand corrected

bimmer and Merc will always be better than FCA

whoever shills for FCA hasn't seen demaros review of the new Maserati whateveritscalled

>>17185958
Ghibli
Video very related to thread
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOZnqnB6xDo

This thread.... /thread

File: godmachine vs cuckbait.png (233KB, 537x493px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 537x493px

Reminder that the M2 is the only good car in the current BMW lineup.

>>17186685
M4 is faster, has a better interior, has the more potent S55 engine.
More expensive, sure.
You get what you pay for

I like how Alfa makes the comeback of the century and still only sold 1/13 BMW has sold the M3 in this year.

File: Alfa number 1.png (249KB, 927x484px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 927x484px

>>17185932
>muh pedigree
>muh subjective views

your shit sounding BMW has gotten BTFO by the giulia QV in every comparison test

@17186804
>look guys I posted it again XD

>>17186813
https://youtu.be/3ZbGdkyrAis

:^^^^)

@17186857
>turboed vs NA
REALLY MAKES YOU THINK.

>>17186790
The Giulia is BTFO by the M3 in every head to head track test.
The Giulia is only praised because Alfa has finally built a car that is not a complete piece of shit after 20 years

>>17186857

Same HP but 195 lb-ft or torque vs 150 lb-ft, I wonder who would win.

File: poobaru.jpg (187KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 1600x900px

>>17184897
boxer engines confirmed trash tbqh ᶂᶏᶆ

GM's shitstain 4.3l vortec