"if it's stupid and it works, it ain't stupid"
Thoughts?
>>17165778
That exact design would slip like mad and is very prone to failure.
>>17165778
Have fun driving straight forever
wider belt and you have a tank .. think about it
That would just slip like a motherfucker and provode no power. Do it right and weld half a fwd to half a rwd.
>>17165778
>>17166115
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://m.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3D-ChAd3dxXRc&ved=0ahUKEwidl_TlxN_TAhVL6YMKHUjPAOYQwqsBCCEwAA&usg=AFQjCNHf1aQUPUSDWpiS3mmjL9fLE_b4rA&sig2=f2nrtAKql7Q_yb2AF36k5Q
>>17166115
That's what GM did.
>front end from a Chevette
>rear end from the front of a Citation
>>17165778
if the belt is hooked up its technically symetrical awd lol
>>17166276
>front end from a Chevette
FR
>rear end from the front of a Citation
FF
What?
>>17166263
OMFG
Learn to link
>>17165790
>>17165899
>>17166115
haters so jelly
>>17165778
>"if it's stupid and it works, it ain't stupid"
If it's stupid but it works, it's still stupid. You're just stupid for continuing it and lucky it hasn't broken or killed you yet.