If you could make one FWD a RWD car, what would you pick?
>>17164907
>>17164907
the obvious choice
Civics
why?
because it would mean cheap, lightweight, COMMON RWD cars for everyone
>>17164907
Prelewd
>>17164907
3gen Prelude
>>17164922
What if AWD with 4ws?
>>17164916
yeah, but muh fuel economy/winter traction/cheapness
Last gen Celica. I also think the twingo (even if it's a meme) could be cool with RWD
>>17164926
What's the bias for the torque split and is the engine longitudinal or transverse?
If it's RWD that works like Haldex or the original quattro I'd do it but if it were like FWD bias with haldex I wouldn't.
>>17164933
let toyota handle that.
>>17164947
yeah, but Honda is a direct competitor, meaning it'll never happen
>>17164907
All Acuras. Especially the TL Type S
>>17164907
Accord coupe v6
It would be great
>>17164912
It wouldn't be as fast. FWD is actually better at handling than RWD, the problem is it has a power threshold.
>>17164979
All gens of the Accord would be GOAT in rwd. It just fits it.
Maybe it would redeem this Korean pos.
>>17165305
naa, it would still be an ugly gook car
>>17164907
SAAB 9-3
1st-gen DSM... AWD just ain't good enough.
probably the prelude
>>17165319
Anti-gook shill go and stay go.
>>17164907
import a Toyota Crown and just enjoy it
The Levins and Sprinters following AE86 should've been RWD.
>>17165414
>defending ugly gook cars
lel
>go and stay go.
no
>>17165432
What possesses a man to shill for free on an Aboriginal cave-art communal noticeboard? Who hurt you, anon?
>>17165305
I'm still amazed they managed to get 167hp out of a 2.7L V6.
>>17164907
None because FWD to RWD conversions are stupid. The end result is often worse than what you started with.
>>17164907
Acura Legend Coupe.
The Integra should have been RWD, although then it wouldn't have the title of best handling FWD car.
Fucking Celicas and Preludes could of been so much more, it makes me sad
>>17165380
>>17165361
Saab would never do rwd.
>>17165541
>celica could of been so much more
just buy a gt4
>>17164907
Not the Integra desu.
It's one of the few FWD cars engineered specifically to draw the most out of a FF drivetrain. RWD defeats the entire purpose of the car.
>>17165486
The ITR was better than the S2K
>>17164944
>Last gen Celica. I also think the twingo (even if it's a meme) could be cool with RWD
You can relatively easily convert it to AWD (3s-gte + stuff from other toyotas)
>>17165470
yeah me too man ;_;
>>17165341
and
>>17165597
this
or buy gt86 which is the new celica replacement
Oldsmobile Aurora
>>17164916
BMW 3-series
>>17164907
Celica has already been mentioned do ill say Mitsubishi eclipse (especially spyder)
>>17164923
loooooooool
As fur the OP
prob a rabbit would be neat
>>17166874
This car right here. Any car putting down enough power to burn out should be rwd.
Also, in regards to better handling and winter traction, why aren't all cars awd with switches to disengage the fwd or rwd diffs? Why don't all cars have the same size brakes and rotors on all 4 wheels with the option to disengage the rear breaks so you can do burnouts. Am I missing something?
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
>>17166879
>he didn't go off the cliff
disappoint
>>17166893
Is that a fwd horse?
>>17166879
Did his nuts ever return to the sack?
the crz
i think it's neat as fuck especially with the playe moved to the side
Saab 900 Turbo
>tfw 5 cyl turbo and RWD never
Mitsubishi FTO
>>17165380
Although the 9000 is FWD, there is a tunnel for driveshaft to the rear as its alfa platform mate was offered with AWD.
My shitbox Sebring
>>17164907
Could have been a mx5 killer
CHEAP RWD CITY SHITBOXMASTER
>>17167529
What is that, elan? I can't tell there's a lot of jpg
>>17164907
Prelude
Del Sol
Integra (I understand it was going to try and be best fwd but it looks so rwd that every time you see it you think of what could've been)
Saabs
>>17165432
Except it doesn't look ugly. It looks like a generic sports coup.
>>17164907
>Del Sol (mid engined)
>VW Caddy (first gen)
>MX-3 (just put the K-series V6 into a hardtop MX-5)
>>17165470
they did make a mr and fr CRX just to test what the effect would be
they decided it offered little benefit and that an entirely new platform was needed
hence the nsx came to be
>>17164907
remove the front half shafts from any 4wd
>>17166893
>that's why we don't have fwd
>make 1 series fwd
>no one has posted the right answer yet
This, mx3 and some small hatch like micra or starlet (I know they made them rwd earlier)
>>17164926
Doesn't Acura do that?
>>17167598
You can buy literally five dozen other RWD landbarges. Why the hell would you ruin the one car that demonstrated that a car can be FWD and powerful without being uncontrollable? The Toronado was an achievement.
>>17167596
Their profit margins matter more than what some autists think, that's the reality of the world
>>17167264
this man has the right idea
>>17167614
Jay leno did it, I specialize like the look of the 68, and I want want in RWD, I still think the FWD is neat,and I wouldn't change any others, it's just not what I want. Hypothetical thread is hypothetical.
>>17167529
shoulda been MR to beat up Fiero and MR2
Still mad
>>17167630
Jay Leno is a fucking dumbass.
>>17167630
its also twin turbo and pushing 1000hp
Fiat Coupe
>>17166891
you would have to pay more for every cars and most cars don't need awd