>Manual cars will stop being produced in your lifetime

File: 1342260072339.jpg (130KB, 550x516px)

130KB, 550x516px

Not if I kill myself now.

File: colors.jpg (559KB, 1516x1178px)

559KB, 1516x1178px

don't care

>human driven cars will stop being produced in your lifetime
>human driven cars will be banned on public roads in your lifetime

>>17140654
>the extinction of mankind will happen in your lifetime

File: 1492650960515.jpg (50KB, 720x596px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 720x596px

>roads are going to be replaced with conveyor belts

>>17140654
I'd be ok with a much, much stricter driving test and have everyone who fails it be restricted to self driving cars. People who get a license to drive can actually drive well, everyone else gets their asses hauled around by computer. Everyone wins.

>>17140684
except that won't happen. autofags will be restricted to driving cars on courses.

File: 2D1EA25A00000578-3261149-image-a-1_1444081231329.jpg (48KB, 634x443px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 634x443px

>>17140619
>Not in Europe for a long time.

>>17140619
Good. Manuals are redundant and should of been gone eons ago.

Watch as manufags sperg over my post.

File: 1490398813356.jpg (112KB, 1600x982px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1600x982px

>>17140619
Mfw petrol sports cars will die in my lifetime.

>>17141833
nice bait. you sure fooled us.

>>17140654
Autonomous cars are overhyped. We'll certainly see cars with high levels of automation driving down a highway for 300 miles, but full automation is currently a pipe dream, because programming an AI to do all of the little things that a human can do in response to every situation (like parking at least 6 inches from a curb if grandma with her artificial hips is a passenger, to make it easy for her to get out) may just be impossible unless we figure out strong AI that can be considered fully sentient. Which then opens up a can of nasty ethical worms regarding slavery and other fun stuff.
>>17140684
We should do that anyway. Can't get a license because you suck? Bus/uber/bicycle/walk or kys or whatever.

>>17142362
>like parking at least 6 inches from a curb if grandma with her artificial hips is a passenger, to make it easy for her to get out
How is this not easily solvable by having some kind of slider telling the computer how much space you want from the curb? The thing about automated cars is that the more of them there are on the road the safer they get because traffic becomes far more predictable and they'll all be able to communicate with each other and get a more accurate idea about traffic conditions by linking their sensor feeds.

>I know what will happen in the future, I read about it on reddit!

>>17142362
This. Even a top of the notch GPS struggles to find the best way to go from point A to point B, as soon as you leave the city.

>>17140654
>illegal nighttime driving to piss off the robots

File: 1479617796645.jpg (481KB, 2758x1822px) Image search: [Google]

481KB, 2758x1822px

>>17140619
>Personally owned vehicles will become illegal in your lifetime.

>>17142383
> but putting a switch to turn on your reversing lights when driving to fuck with robots

>>17140619
>>17140634
>>17140654
>>17140665
>>17140671
>>17141957
>>17141833
>>17142436
>>17142403
>all these goyim cucks and beta faggots kneeling to (((AI)))

>>17142487
the fuck are u on about

>>17142383
You could definitely have such a slider, but think about the thousands of edge cases like that you'd need to account for in a dumb system, and all of the bugs that accounting for them will introduce into the software. The more complex the system, the more likely it is to fail, and many current systems are already far too complex and buggy.

I also don't believe the rhetoric about the more there are, the safer they'll be, or that they'll all communicate with each other in a secure fashion that can't be spoofed with malicious data. That would require high degrees of standardization, and the various companies working on automated cars are resisting that or any kind of transparency tooth and nail. Even going so far as to have federally-mandated standards won't work, because company A will interpret the standards differently than company B, which happens all the fucking time with RFCs in the IT world, causing the countless interoperability problems that plagues any techie's work life.

File: 1380479679262.jpg (7KB, 149x143px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 149x143px

>>17140619
Feels good man.

File: 1333130703253.jpg (22KB, 257x400px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 257x400px

>>17140619
You really want to feel bad? Go to www.cars.com and do a search for new cars, all makes and models, then filter it down to manuals.

Better get the noose ready to save time later.

File: stossel.jpg (17KB, 372x290px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 372x290px

>>17140684
>much, much stricter driving test
>implying that shitty driving is caused by not knowing traffic rules as opposed to just not giving a shit

File: Red riding hood approves.jpg (63KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1024x576px

>>17140619
>manual cars stop being produced
>Cant make them illegal
>Eventually such a small number of manuals are on the roads, speed limits become obsolete
>no speed limits
>no cops running radar

>>17142563
he means manual transmission you fuckwit

File: 1490790554544.gif (408KB, 680x650px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 680x650px

>>17142563
>All robot drivers detect your coming and move out of the way.

>>17142564
But he didnt say manual transmission. A manual car would be a car you drive manually. Op is obviously talking about the advent of self driving cars either that or hes retarded.

>>17142566
lmao nobody calls non-self driving cars, manual cars. They're just called cars. He clearly was referencing manual transmissions.

>>17142569
No one calls a car with a manual transsmission a manual car. Its either manual, manual transmission or a stick.

>>17141833
How else will poorfags poorfag on the road?

File: 1476077353468.jpg (1MB, 2048x1901px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1901px

>V8 sportcars became obsolete in your lifetime

File: Will GM fangirls ever recover.jpg (273KB, 2044x2024px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 2044x2024px

>>17142613

>>17142594
Poorfags shouldn't be on the road.

>>17140654
Came to post this
Feels bad

File: 5457-1232925368.jpg (36KB, 352x240px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 352x240px

>manual transmission