>be europiss manufacturers >forced to make turbocharged

>>17132490
Im pretty sure my E60 M5 is a lot more thirsty and unreliable as an F10 M5.

So it isnt really that much of a meme in some cars.

>>17132490
Nobody but Americans believe this.

>>17132527
Than an F10 M5*

English is no bueno

>>17132527
Still rather pay the upkeep costs on an E46 than an F80.

Its the same meme in North America except that chebby started to use 1.5l turbo on crossover. My mother with the 2.4l get like 13l/100 km (18 mpg).

>>17132490
>autistic kids who don't understand engines: the post
fuck this gay board

>>17132490
>engine sound,
Literally who cares?

>>17132490
Do what???

Thank FUCK my car did come with a turbo!

Got an APR 93 octane tune for my 2015 GTI and its a actually borderline fast.

Thank you based VW for the turbo!

>>17134444
Honda also has the 1.5t in the CRV I think but it makes sense when its literally just replacing some N/A 2.0 and still makes more power/torque while delivering better MPG's.

We are just seeing the maturing of turbocharger technology that is ready to be put into mass production reliably.

>>17132542
The upkeep for an F80 for the first few years is literally zero dollars. Of course once we get to out of warranty and maintenance it's way more expensive but for now wheeee

File: maxresdefault.jpg (242KB, 1439x811px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1439x811px

>>17132490

>>17135943
>literally ruined the Mustang to appeal to the yuro market

File: 4L_1ZUvtIQZ.jpg (156KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 640x480px

>giving up engine sound for LE TURBO XDD
no

>>17132490
don't forget engine sound

>>17135943
yeah and its the baby entry level version

>>17132490
And such, this is life in Yuropooria

<Nat geo music>

File: 2017-Ford-GT-PLACEMENT-626x382.jpg (60KB, 626x382px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 626x382px

>>17136217

>>17134444
>13l/100 km

City driving? Because holy shit even for a 2.4 that's a lot

>>17134444
THats horrific. I get 14L/100km on a 4.0L v6 if I drive like a normal person

File: i is computer fix.jpg (205KB, 1023x685px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 1023x685px

>>17136297
>single turbo 4 banger is the same as a twin turbo 6

>>17136341
the car in OPs image is a turbo 6 cylinder

File: i fix it good.jpg (46KB, 582x390px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 582x390px

>>17136355
and the post i replied to calling it a baby entry level version was a pic of an ecoboost mustang

>>17136355
it's available with a 1.6 inline 4 turbo in, you guessed it, yurop

>engine sound
When will the autistics finally fuck off

File: Blue_Sunset-1440[1].jpg (92KB, 1440x670px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1440x670px

>>17136378
this
glorious electric master race

>>17136367
>available with an inline 4 turbo in

so the same as the American Mustang then

>>17136378
>>17136386
you're either cucks or shills, both are pathetic
https://youtu.be/NJ3tEAT97B8

>>17136403
>slower than a pigfat 7-seater family sedan

>>17136413
I'll bite the bait.
>2.0 0-60 is the only thing that matters

>>>/n/

>>17132490
Turbo i6 Beemers actually sound much better than the N/A versions. Gets rid of the gay ass fart can exhaust note.

>>17136639
Kill you are self please.

I agree on everything but engine sound
dont get me wrong, I love a nice sounding engine but I can go without it, its not really that important to me

>>17136639
the only good sounding bmw turbo i6 is the n54/55
https://youtu.be/_jhTuVzzqg8?list=FLlT6Y4Cd8iPAyENJJ45aaGA

>>17137095
https://youtu.be/wtSb8ItbLkI

File: 1491208315966.jpg (49KB, 751x418px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 751x418px

>>17137095
>>17137103
>says the n54 sounds good
>posts s54
???

>>17135952
>what is the Ford Mustang SVO
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eXQqF5QrcG8

>>17136367
The EU EcoBoost has the same 2.3 as in burgerland you retard