Im going to buy a V6 Challenger. Fight me.

>>17107166
Don't be a bitch like the rest of /o/ getting an Auto challenger

>>17107175
Why would he get the slower manual?

>>17107175
The V6 doesnt have a manual option. You triggered m8?

File: 1473798163357.jpg (34KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 500x500px

Not gonna say it's a terrible car but come on man. At least get an R/T. These cars are not fast enough to back up the look with just the v6. You won't get that low rumble that gets nods of respect from every male in a 500 mile radius. You will get tired of people asking if it's a v8 and being disappointed when you tell them it isn't. My friend just got a v6 charger and he regrets not getting the R/T. If you can't afford a new R/T, get a used one. You will get more respect with a used R/T than with a new v6.

File: sad.jpg (185KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 960x640px

>>17107175
>>17107188
This is the future we all deserve

File: 1486479951957.jpg (58KB, 566x480px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 566x480px

typical fca customer that's too fucking stupid to comprehend that the v8 is superior

have fun getting btfo by miatas at red lights :)

>>17107197
>cuck logic

>>17107214
Sounds like the opposite of cuckold logic.

>>17107175
>manual fag

The ZF 8 speed is the superior transmission. Faster shifts, automatic revmatching, and adapts to your driving. There's a reason why almost every high end performance and luxury car uses it

>>17107337
You want an auto go get a civic

File: IMG_0808.png (263KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 750x1334px

>>17107370
The sad part is unless he's buying a 2016 challenger with a V6 he'll be slower than a BRZ and literally slower than a minivan.

>>17107386
That's the price you pay buying an automatic

>>17107393
Nah that's the price you pay for ~300 HP at literally two tons
The auto is faster and better in this Use

>>17107386
>4000lb car
>slow as a BRZ

who cares?

>>17107416
>The auto is faster and better in this Use
Why because it shifts faster than you're fatass can?

>>17107418
OP, the people who gave me (you)s
Also my wife in her Grand Caravan R/T (also faster)

>>17107431
My challenger has never gone over 3k rpms. Does my slowness bother you?

>>17107448
It's expected.

>>17107448
>My challenger has never gone over 3k rpms
Why the FUCK did you buy a challenger?

File: camaromustang.jpg (161KB, 1136x852px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1136x852px

>>17107214
If you're buying a v6 challenger I wouldn't go around telling other people they're cucks. That's like saying the guy fucking your girl is the cuck. You bought a new v6 muscle car that is slower than a miata and will be worth half what you owe on it within a single year. Jesus dude the projecting lol. Pic related. My v8 muscle car. The Mustang belongs to a woman. It's a nice little v6.

>>17107458
Because it's obviously his wife's boyfriends dream car.
He's just taking care of it til the divorce is finalized

>>17107166
>V6 Challenger

All show, no go. Pretty much sums up this car.

>>17107470
lol you bought a camaro because of a kids movie.

>>17107166
>Fight me.
It's not fair to fight the mentally retarded.

File: I hope you like camaros.jpg (189KB, 2048x1150px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 2048x1150px

>>17107889
Damn right. You make it sound like owning a cool sports car from an extremely popular movie is a bad thing. What do you drive?

>>17107470
NICE CAR

i bet it can turn unlike that vee six challenger

File: dsc_6468.jpg (33KB, 560x383px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 560x383px

Just custom ordered a brand new scat pack last weekend. In manual.

Get cucked OP in your slow quiet piece of shit

:^)

File: 1281938936290.jpg (78KB, 540x366px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 540x366px

>>17108399
>add more power
>still cant turn

File: nut.jpg (34KB, 540x408px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 540x408px

>>17108399
Dope.

If you're gonna get the SXT, go with the Charger instead. It has roughly the same amount of power and has AWD. At least get that.

I've never owned a muscle car. Don't see myself doing so in the future. But I know that if I didn't purchase a Challenger, Camaro, or Mustang, it would be the V8.

That's coming from a guy whose never owned anything larger than a 4 cylinder. Even I know you get the V8.

File: 1488487676516.png (176KB, 658x545px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 658x545px

>>17108399
>scat pack
>offered on shit cars

File: 1380737037081.jpg (48KB, 400x410px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 400x410px

>>17108524
Lets see your car fuck boi.

>>17108413
>Turning

We don't have to do that in America, bucko

File: MMNc7vB.jpg (39KB, 438x438px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 438x438px

>>17108524
>Scion xD
>not funny

>>17107166
>V6 challenger

why bother?

File: 00402fc92925fcea37077f17b019ed95.jpg (10KB, 300x250px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 300x250px

>>17108524
available in three (t)rim levels ™
>scat pack
>shart pack
>shag pack
>

File: 1474030464819.png (30KB, 710x577px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 710x577px

>>17108701

>>17108543
The funny thing is this is somewhat true. Most people spend like 95% of their time driving in straight lines on the highway.

>>17107166
>V6 Challenger
It better be because you need the all wheel drive option

>>17108399
Is the R/T still enough to have fun with? I heard it has the same 0-60 as a fucking GTI haha

>>17108788
Yeah the R/T is fun. 375 hp 410 lb-ft torque. You get the rumble and the sound and no one will call you a fag because at least you have a v8. 0-60 should be in low-mid 5's. Not super fast but faster than most cars on the road. R/T's are more about the image and having just enough power to back it up. The challenger/charger need the 6.4 to really compete with the camaro/mustang though performance wise. I'd say if you're not racing your car all the time an R/T is plenty for having fun and cruising around.

>>17107166
Go for it bro. I get compliments all the time in mine. I'd rather have some middle aged dude talk to me about my car rather than some fuckboi mustang queer. Camaro are okay tho.

>>17107386
Thats the challenger with the 3.5 L V6 and 4-speed auto....which they only sold from 2009-2010.
0-60 in 7.5 seconds

The 2011-2014 got updated to the 5 speed auto and 3.6 L V6 with 305 hp/268 lbft. 0-60 in 6.2 seconds.

The 2015 got updated to the ZF 8 speed auto with the same 3.6 L V6
0-60 in 6 seconds

So besides being faster than a 9 year old car, it's slower against every relatively new V6 challenger.

buy what you want, man. just don't expect to win any races.

>>17107470
lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJm1w-wTomo

Wish I'd gotten a challenger. I like the aesthetic more. But, I do like my mustang.
GJ.

>buy V6 Challenger
>install $700 75hp dry nitrous kit

That was easy

>>17109185
>75 hp

wow its fucking nothing

>tfw you like the looks of the Challenger the most out of the trio but deep down you know it performs the worst
It's the Veloster all over again

File: 1386651190814.jpg (140KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 720x480px

>>17109146
Stay mad dude. What do you drive? A 130 hp piece of shit? Nothing? Thought so.

>>17109185
>bottle runs out
>limp to the bottle store
>every mustang and challenger revs their v8's at all the redlights on the way
>cry
>get refill
>a challenger at redlight when leaving shopping center
>open valve
>"heh nothing personnel kid"
>still loses

>>17108788
2016 GTI w/ 6 speed manual and performance package 0-60: 5.9 seconds

2016 challenger R/T w/6 speed manual 0-60: 5.1 seconds

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2015-dodge-challenger-r-t-57-liter-manual-test-review

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2017-volkswagen-golf-gti-tested-review

>>17107166
I had a brand new one as a rental a couple of times

The 8 speed auto and the cruise logic was a bit on the retarded side, it handled like ass, it wasn't particularly good on fuel, traction was worse than most of the ancient RWD things I normally mess with (240z, 240sx, etc), the A/C felt a little lack luster in Ohio summers, and side and rear view visibility was kind of shit.

All in all, I don't really recommend it.

>>17109199
Me too. It's like that fat girl who you kind of wanna fuck because you heard she does anal and sucks a mean dick but you don't want your friends to know.

>>17109230
Thank you. I always tell people who want to compare the R/T to a new GT or SS that no it's not that fast, but it's much cheaper than a camaro ss or a scat pack and 5.1 seconds is not slow at all. A new car that looks that good with a 5.7 v8 for around 30k. Yes the R/T is a good car. Just avoid the sadmode v6

>>17109250
See
>>17109228

>>17109230
Edmunds has a 2016 GTI and R/T at 5.9 and 5.8 respectively.

>>17109146
lolcantturn.mp4

>>17107470
>v6 muscle car


>v6
>muscle car
pick one

>>17109199
>performs the worst
>what is the hellcat

>>17109312
Nigger, he was comparing GT, SS, R/T

>>17109312
>what is the hellcat
but can it turn?

>>17109250
There was this one girl in my group of friends who always had greasy hair and self-inflicted cuts on her legs like an emo kid. People always said she was so gross, but I secretly wanted to fuck her because I heard from two guys who claim she does anal. Years later and I still regret not giving her a call lol

>>17109361
anal is overrated, pussy feels way better

File: 1404265191384.jpg (39KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 400x400px

>>17107166

I guess I'll ask here

Whats the difference between a v6 engine that has lets say 400hp vs a v8 that has 400hp?

I dont know much about cars...

>>17109386
nothing really the V8 will probably sound better and will be smoother but besides that it won't matter

>>17109386
Generally speaking the v6 has two sharp peaks in the power department. The v6 will rev higher, but the v8 has flatter curves and sounds better. That's the extremely watered down version.

>>17109386
A 400 horsepower V6 will use forced induction. Different feel than a N/A V8.

>>17109386
v6 will only have good power at certain rpms like this anon said
>>17109409


also, the v8 will have more potential for power. if you stick a supercharger on both with the same boost, the v8 will make more power. the v6 is already being pushed to it's limit like this anon said
>>17109414

>>17109384
How will I know though? I wanted to try it with her because I'd already heard she does it so wouldn't feel weird about asking.

>>17109312
Hellcat get stomped by ZL1 and GT350 anywhere that matters. It's like Ferd and Chebby finally had a revelation and gave their cars the abilities to turn and be competitive on the world stage, while Dodge doubled down on DUDE DRAG LMAO because that's all it could really aspire to do.

>>17109504
Kind of works out in their favor though. No other cars are strictly muscle cars like that. Hellcat has 6.4L for christ' sake.

File: costanza belittles.jpg (34KB, 375x375px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 375x375px

>>17107166
>paying at minimum $27k for a 1998 mercedes with a chrysler v6 and automatic transmission
Kill you'reself

Why is it so hard to find Challengers with a more subtle paint job that doesn't scream "I have Cialis in the glove box"? I don't want any goddamn racing stripes or gay decals.

>>17109606
Think of their primary target audience.

>>17108365
whats the matter faggot, to poor to get voltron logo on it? gaaaaaaaaaaaaaay.

>>17107470
arent miatas faster than corvettes?

>>17110351
Only on those twisty mountain roads they pretend to live near.

>>17107166
I won't fight you, I'll leave you to your own autism.

File: 1444840111625.jpg (946KB, 1280x1920px) Image search: [Google]

946KB, 1280x1920px

>>17108788
R/T is good enough, just for fucks sake don't get the v6. R/T isn't great but it makes the right sound for a muscle car and it's relatively quick. Yes it's enough to have plenty of fun with. If you get a Challenger I swear the first thing people will say to you after "hey I like your car..." is "is that a v-8?" or "that thing got a HEMI?!?!" If you don't at the very least get a base model R/T you'll regret ever getting a Challenger

File: IMAG0449.jpg (3MB, 4000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4000x3000px

Hey OP

15' challenger SRT 392 owner here. Listen to the other anons when they tell you to buy an R/T 5.7 L V8 over the SXT V6.

i've driven every model variation of the challenger and can tell you that you won't be disappointed with the V6 but the 5.7 L V8 is so much more superior. It sounds cooler, is faster, and is more reliable as the 5.7 L "eagle" V8 has been in production since 2003 vs. 2011 for the 3.6 L pentastar V6.

Buying the V6 makes sense for someone who wants a comfortable and cool looking GT car as their DD but since you're on /o/ and seem to be looking for performance, get the V8. If you can't afford a brand new one, get a used one.

>>17108399
nice
what kind of monies? around msrp?

>>17109116
>faster than a BRZ
CONGRATS MY DUDE

File: 1462925443028.jpg (64KB, 559x649px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 559x649px

>>17110745
Are insurance rates considerably higher for an RT 5.7 vs V6. I have a clean driving record. Not OP btw.

>>17109538
the zl1 is 6.2 liters

File: 1971.jpg (158KB, 2000x1358px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 2000x1358px

>>17110801
Really depends on where you live. It'd be an extra 70 cents per month (srsly) for me to insure an R/T vs an SXT. A Hellcat would be an extra $1.50, which I don't get.

>>17110820
Cars like that are often used as showpieces so the risk of them is considered much lower
Also you'll probably find that they'll require extensive coverage for most supercars.

either
A: a troll
B: a woman
if not A then get them tits out, you know the rules

>>17110398
So a V6 challenger is faster than a corvette.

>>17109504
>Hellcat get stomped by ZL1 and GT350 anywhere that matters
As it should.
I get what you're saying but the Challenger is a muscle car, it's not really made to compete with either of those cars.

My v6 camaro is gonna kick your ass

Do not buy a v6 muscle car, everyone will think you're a pussy and even if you don't care about it, at a certain point it WILL get to you when you realize everyone thinks you're in a cucked and gelded Challenger. Which you are.

Buy what you like OP

People who worry about what other people think of them are cucks

>>17107470
Does your gf own a v6 mustang too? Kek

So does mine :)

>>17108413
It's a touring car not a racecar. It's supposed to be a fun highway car

The weight actually is nice when you're doing 120 down the highway

File: tesla-s-p90-02.jpg (468KB, 1400x795px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 1400x795px

>>17107166
slower than a family sedan

>>17111517
t. tesla marketing department

>>17111517
>use Ludicruous mode in one drag race
>win
>haha superior electric wins xD
>have to wait 2 hours to recharge car
>Charger owner is already at home being comfy enjoying internet memes and shitposting
Fug :DD

>>17110775
41k for mine. I was trying to get very few options but after they told me about the new Dynamic package for the 2017 model I had to have it, imo it was a no brainer. It's bigger brakes, the same 6 piston brembos as the hellcat. Also the same forged aluminum wheels as the hellcat but the center says Dodge instead of SRT. The rear wheels are now the same width as the SRTs and not those thin things that come on a normal challenger, and it came w better pirrelli tires. Cost an extra 2k

>>17111454
>Do not buy a v6 muscle car
You do realize v6 camaros, mustangs, and challengers make up the bulk of sports cars on the road, right? The majority of people wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a straight 4 and a v6. Only people who will notice, or actually give a damn, are /o/tists.

File: 1487376357221.jpg (19KB, 299x362px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 299x362px

>>17113182
>everyone else on the road has autism
>maybe i should be autistic too

good logic, champ

>>17113200
autism is noticing that, not being unable to do it

File: interior.jpg (51KB, 808x500px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 808x500px

Id rather have a new Challenger V6 with that very nice interior than a V8 with that vomitous interior.

>>17113182
>"sports car"

>>17107166
I couldn't think of a worse car to buy and become in debt with ...

File: IMG_1699.jpg (186KB, 2208x844px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 2208x844px

>buying the ford camaro

File: that gm quality.gif (2MB, 800x373px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 800x373px

>>17107166
Why not lease a V8 instead?
>>17114301
any chebby

>>17114219
>Challenger
>nice interior

American cars are really just engines on wheels, just accept that fact and buy the v8

Enjoy your rental fleet quality interior and shit handling

>>17107166

>v6

>>17107166
do what you want but no one will respect it and everyone will make fun of you

File: scatpack2.jpg (123KB, 1007x639px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 1007x639px

>>17107166

V6 doesn't have that spark that will put a grin on your face, but at least you'll be comfy.

If you're set on V6, I suggest getting at least one with the Super Track Pack and 8.4 uConnect system.

File: 2015-dodge-charger-srt-392-driver-profile-in-motion20copy_zpslnrnufsy.jpg (180KB, 1024x608px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 1024x608px

Can't wait to own a V8 one day

>>17107188
If he's already getting a slow car might as well make it fun with a manual

File: dodge-magnum.jpg (52KB, 666x388px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 666x388px

>>17116570
I wish Dodge would bring the Magnum back.

>>17114219
If you're buying an american muscle car for the interior you're falling at the first hurdle. You buy these things for the engine. The v8 engine.

>>17107166
>Im going to buy a V6 Challenger.
>Fight me.

Punching faggots is a hate crime.

>>17107214
Ok so this is literally the opposite of whatever the fuck "cuck logic" is.

Turbo it and turn it into a tuner car