Why are these two cars never mentioned here ? they seem fun
cuck shit for women and the gays LMAO
>>17012247
but these are cute
>>17012233
What issit?
>>17012263
opel tigra and ford puma, small cute 4 cyl coupes
>>17012233
My mum had a Ford Puma so I consider it a literal middle-aged woman car. Borrowed it once, wasn't particularly quick but fun as fuck for a front wheel drive car.
>>17012263
Fiesta/Corsa coupe
>>17012233
because they were Europe only and 90% of /o/ is American so Americans didn't get them.
>>17012263
The top one is an Opel/Vauxhall Tigra.
The bottom one is a Ford Puma.
Because they are pieces of shit pretending to be sporty coupe but in reality a miata seems like a muscle car compared to that.
I liked the look of the Tigra but both rusted like HELL.
>>17012275
America didn't get the twingo either yet this board won't shut up about it
>>17012305
because twingo face is piercingly silly/cute, stands out and stays in your mind while these are just "meh, preddy cool".
also, reaction images are part of the blood of imageboards and those cars do not work for reaction images at all.
>>17012270
>puma
Wasn't it called the Cougar? I don't suppose they gave it different animal names like Cougar, Puma or Cheetah depending on the market right? Because that would be autistic.
>>17013602
No. The model above it was called the Ford Cougar. The Cougar was sold in the US as the Mercury Cougar.
>>17013602
The Cougar was more a Mondeo coupe, the Puma was Fiesta-sized.
I now remember the Ford Cougar and have become depressed. Thanks.
Is the cargo Twingo /o/ approved?
>>17013631
isn't cute, so no.
>>17013869
Well, it's cuter than any other city van.
>>17013631
Shit eating grin, not a carefree smile so no, it is not
>>17013625
>tfw you realize the Ford/Mercury Cougar was the last time Mercury tried to capture their sporty image and they got lauged at for it
>>17013968
>Shit eating grin
Ford Puma a GOAT.
Prove me wrong.
>>17014166
>Prove me wrong.
it's based on this.
The saddest car to ever exist
>>17012233
>front
>wheel
>drive
Toyota did it better
Didn't Mazda have a similar version?
>>17014232
It does look rather sad.
>>17014054
Thanks for giving me nightmares