Alfa Romeo Giulia Thread

File: 2016-Alfa-Romeo-Giulia-Quadrifoglio-8.jpg (456KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

456KB, 2000x1333px

>>16992406
fuck off with your mazda

>>16992406
at least its manual

File: 1487096278625.jpg (17KB, 542x540px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 542x540px

>>16994353
WEW LAD

>>16994353
eheheheh

>>16994353
son, i got some bad news.

>>16994353
excuse me?

>>16994353
Yep, fuck the FCA for not giving us a manual Giulia

File: Muh edges.png (1MB, 1080x1067px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x1067px

>>16992406
Looks like shit senpai

>>16994353
absolutely spicy

File: 1471118104668 (1).png (55KB, 436x425px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 436x425px

>>16994353
NO CHILL
O

C
H
I
L
L

>>16994418
Wtf is that even, I want one

>>16994353
burgers on suicide watch lmfao

File: how-much-power-the-alfa-romeo-giulia-quadrifoglio-really-makes-on-the-dyno_4.jpg (156KB, 1808x1056px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1808x1056px

>>16992406

>Makes less whp than a 16 year old NA Corvette

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpEXE2431ko

I can see why Italy doesn't try to compete.

>>16995080
How long does it take said Corvette to lap Nürburgring?

File: julia.jpg (119KB, 720x393px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 720x393px

>>16995113

Not that long. Quicker than that Italian shitbox that's going to break down at least twice or crash...

>>16995197
>implying the cuckvette doesn't overheat and has to limp half the lap
GM fangirls everyone
also I don't see how a pic that shows a Giulia being used for insurance fraud proves anything other than its safety

File: crashed-2017-alfa-romeo-giulia.jpg (257KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 1920x1080px

>>16995212

>CANT EVEN HANDLE THE STRAIGHT ROADS OF AMERICA

How's it supposed to go around a track? I guess that's why they lied about their laptime and HP to the wheels.

>>16995265
>burgers at the wheel
really makes you think

>>16995265
they didn't lie about the lap time, they did tweak the suspension heavily though as you can see in the burgerking run video.
>trusting italians
>ever

>>16995080
>Big thanks to Chad

REEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>16995080
392whp sounds about right.

To those who have never dynoed their car, there are 3 dynos - DynoJet, DynoPack, and MustangDyno. DynoJet overinflates your numbers the most and MustangDyno underinflates it. So if you dyno 300whp on a DynoJet, expect to dyno 270-280whp on a MustangDyno.

There's also dyno correction factors like STD/SAE/etc. SAE underinflates it some more (about 5-10hp if you have around 300hp). Suppose to adjust for temperature differences or whatever the fuck.

So if we take the 500hp at the crank and apply the 15% drivetrain power loss rule, it's around at 425whp. SAE on (which most dynos have implemented since the mid 2000s) probably drops it to 415whp on a DynoJet. Mustang AWD Dyno loses around another 20whp so we are at 395whp. That's about right.

File: 2016-02-01 01.38.40.gif (265KB, 745x576px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 745x576px

>>16994353

>>16994353
completely savage jesus christ anon