Will it be real, br/o/s?

>>16962800
i hope not

>>16962800
Real fucking expensive, maybe.

>>16962814
Nope. Just a dead concept OP.
Now get off this board before you miss your bus stop.

What the fuck is wrong with Toyota's designs lately?

This better be a concept car

>>16962815
Why not?

>>16962829
You know it.

>>16962841
These were leaked 11 hours ago.

>>16962845
You're about 7 years behind the times.

>>16962861
>You're about 7 years behind the times.

Toyota design bored people to sleep before but recent Toyotas are too offensive for people's viewing

>>16962829

"but it is noted that concept cars usually cost around a US$1 million to build. Hunter has stated FT-1 is still in the concept stage with no current production plans. He added that if the public's reaction is positive it would only help to move the FT-1 from concept to production and that anything is possible in the future. Alex Shen, the studio chief designer, also hinted at a US$60,000 price tag. He was quoted saying, "It's a Toyota, it ought to be affordable."

>>16962878
The Supra was like a $20k car

No one is going to buy this meme for $60k

>>16962898
>The Supra was like a $20k car
Ahaha

AHHAHAHA

File: 1-alien-autopsy.jpg (101KB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 800x1200px

>>16962800
would purchase

>>16962983
What ...... the fuck.

Is that a prop or did some poor bastard actually end up like that?

>>16962800
This just landed in Hong Kong. Wonder what they're going to use it for.

>>16962861
The Ft1 concept has been around for at least a whole year now dipshit.
They weren't "leaked".
It's just Toyota's marketing division pulling publicity.
Do some research nigger and get back on that bus.

File: mega pops.jpg (37KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 640x480px

>>16962800
>SIDE MIRROR AIR SCOOPS
Bilmey

>>16962983
wtf is this and can you stop posting it on this board thatnk you

>>16963018
>It's just Toyota's marketing division pulling publicity.
And you know this how? Post source. Find a duplicate of any of these anywhere.

>>16963022
>not liking the elegant aerodynamic shape

>>16962898
Try adjusting for inflation mate. It's close to 50k.

File: IMG_7789.jpg (155KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 1280x720px

>>16963029
I'm not saying that thise photis aren't new. You just can't really call it a fucking "leak" if it's been public info for a while you retard.

File: Capture.png (8KB, 301x304px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 301x304px

>>16962815
came here to post this
>>16962898
pic related

File: 6232410789_ab17092fd4_o.jpg (568KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

568KB, 1000x664px

>>16962898
you are off by $20k. Confirmed for underage or just plain stupid.

>1998 Supra Turbo's MSRP was around $40,000, which is about $57,000 in today's money.

>>16963036
>elegant
no. it looks like shit. the mach 5 is elegant.

get taste. and if that toyota ain't the fastest little rice bullet on the road, it's going to look even stupider.

but in that particular post I was impressed by the mirror scoops. the silver lining in all of this- as it's not the puny side scoops

>>16963051
The surprise is that they're still using this body concept, not that the FT-1 exists. They keep changing the design, but this is hope they might still follow through on this one.

>>16963053
He's both anon.
Where are our mods when we need them.

>>16962898
Turbo supra in 98 was 40k msrp, adjusted for inflation that is 60k. So the price is right, but I wish they would make a non turbo version of the new supra for like 40k. Maybe have one version with like 350hp NA and a TT version with like 500hp.

>>16963056
>the mach 5 is elegant.
Speed Racer? The rolling trident?

>>16963065
Now you're thinking with portals. Too bad Toyota doesn't seem too logical these days.

>>16963052
Why do you care if a car you can't afford gets produced?

File: page-10172.jpg (64KB, 577x320px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 577x320px

>>16963067
pictured: inspired design

>>16963061
They're most likely just using it as display for all of the Toyota fanboys and richbois wating to drop the money as sooon as it releases.
Concepts are just a way to keep the audience interested.
The final product probably won't even look close to that.

>>16963073
Yeah it's too bad no one wants to make affordable sports cars anymore, but at least they aren't making it a 100-200k super car though.

>>16963088
W-we can hope, r-right?

>>16963081
nice projection

i hope it's not produced because if rumors are to be believed, it's a betrayal of everything the A80 embodied

>>16963110
It wasn't projection if the only thing you mentioned in your post was price.

But how would you envision a proper A80 successor? Not that I think this is it, but curious.

My advice to Toyota is to study Ferrari. They are in a much bigger sandbox and have a greater understanding.

File: scion-FR-S-concept-01.jpg (52KB, 660x368px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 660x368px

>>16963088
The frs concept looks pretty similar to the actual product.

>>16963110
>>16963120
Yeah honestly I think the A80 was just a great 90s moment that can't really be reproduced today.
Not with Toyota becoming a complete shill machine ever since the early 2000s.
There will probably be no true A80 successor I mean look at what they tried with the gt86.
If you think the trueno has any relation to that slow box with a subaru motor then you are the cancer.

>>16963120
straight 6, TT, manual, rwd. judging by how automakers have been eschewing dialogue with actual enthusiast consumers, i have very little reason to believe they'll even offer a manual, not to mention that they'll most likely be using a variant of the GR engine, and a hybridized drivetrain. it'll be a fast lexus that looks as bad as modern toyota, and that's boring.

>>16963134
That's completely different though.
The FRS was it's own car it didn't take long to go from conept to production because it looked nice and nobody expected anything.
People want the new supra here and Toyota's gonna do a lot of changes to try and get it right.

>>16963161
>it'll be a fast lexus that looks as bad as modern toyota
God, this hurt to read, because it's probably true.

>>16963161
>The Truth
alright this anon finished the thread time to go to bed now kiddos

>>16963177
truth dubs checked.
im sad though.

>>16962804
>>16962800
>>16962814
>FT = fucking trash
Holy hell that is one ugly fuck.

>>16962800
Look at that goddamn nose. Jewpra.

>>16963161
It is getting a turbo straight six, but its gonna be made by BMW

>>16963208
No it's not.

>>16963222
>borrow engines from Subaru
>borrow engines from BMW
Toyota really sucks at engines right now.

why does it look so fucking stupid? i hate how overcomplicated most modern cars look, especially if they're supposed to be spiritual successors of classic designs.

take the new NSX for example, it looks absolutely nothing like the original car, rather like a knockoff ferrari covered in unnecessarily aggressive body panels that look like they're out of an 80s sci-fi movie; this ft-1 is even worse, it looks like a lexus RC F on PCP. mazda does a good job of making their old cars look sleek and modern without making them look like some hell demon from the future.

why cant they just take the original supra design and modernize it? i mean, same basic functions but a new platform, new engine, new higher tech interior. and make it look like a modern supra.

>>16963222
>"It is getting a turbo straight six"
http://www.caranddriver.com/news/2019-toyota-supra-spy-photos-news

[citation needed]

File: 1451856537893.jpg (43KB, 445x503px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 445x503px

>>16962804
Santa Maria

File: 1483144559519.jpg (5KB, 150x147px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 150x147px

>>16963242
>The Supra will use a Toyota four-cylinder in the most affordable variants, while higher-zoot versions will get a new V-6 (code name 943F) bolstered by a pair of turbos that will push output to 400 horsepower and 300 lb-ft of torque.
AHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAHA You know what that means, NX200 engine for base model and a boosted Camry V6 topping out at a gay 400bhp. FLOP INCOMING

Did Toyota get its balls back?
Toyota got its balls back

>>16963287
maybe if they fuck up enough they'll finally adapt and fire their entire design team.

File: 1449100418289.png (71KB, 592x492px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 592x492px

>>16963242
>400hp/300tq

File: ISUCK.png (61KB, 510x572px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 510x572px

>>16962800
>>16962802
>>16962804
>>16962808
>>16962814

Rear by itself doesn't look bad, but I'm surprised there aren't any callbacks to the mk4 in the headlights and taillights. Front is awful and overdesigned like most cars these days - what the fuck were they thinking with that square bumper that looks like a seat. Side vents are a bit too big and the rear fenders don't blend into the body very well. Also the mirrors don't look good from the front.

Overall it looks like the front and rear were designed for two different cars and then just smashed together. Cars these days seem to lack any sort of singular design philosophy and just end up as amalgamations of fitting the most amount of angles, curves and vents that they possibly can so it looks like a "supercar".

Will probably come with a v6 and paddle shifters only because no company gives a shit about straight sixes anymore besides bmw.

File: 2017-Chevrolet-Corvette-GrandSport-2.jpg (233KB, 1600x1065px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 1600x1065px

>>16963285
>>16963305
>meanwhile in the USA
http://www.autoblog.com/2017/04/03/2018-corvette-zr1-convertible-caught-at-gm-proving-grounds/
"700hp"

File: FireShot Capture 30 - _o_ - _o_ - Auto - 4chan - https___boards.4chan.org_o_thread_16829027.png (239KB, 474x375px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 474x375px

>>16963322

>>16963242
So the toy is gonna use BMWs little roadster platform for it's ultimate supercar? Seems like kind of a cheap move to me. I mean they really should have looked into a better platformfor this car than a Z4.

>>16963340
Supra is not a supercar.

>>16963322
This one will overheat after just half a lap?

File: 2055964_600.jpg (173KB, 599x355px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 599x355px

>>16963348
>wut does he mean by this

>>16963413

corvette with a bodykit. nice try

File: 1-cd3-93.jpg (84KB, 775x1045px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 775x1045px

>>16963347
You're right, it's a Supracar.

>>16963105
>Yeah it's too bad no one wants to make affordable sports cars anymore
I think most people have realized now that if you just wait about, most sports cars become affordable in the used market. Before the C7, Corvette was mostly a car owned by people who had money, but now someone can get a C5z for around 20k with low miles and in great shape.

I want it to fuck off and have toyota make the sfr instead.

>>16963961
no

>>16963965
yes

>>16963970
maybe

>>16963974
I don't know

File: 1488388298898.jpg (63KB, 778x512px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 778x512px

>>16963285
>NX200 engine for base model

why is this a bad thing? it could be the turbo fr-s we've always wanted and it might even be affordable

>>16962983
i miss alphonso and his geralt shitposting

I want the Supra to come back but not until Mazda revives the rotary.

Bonus points if both are still using twin turbo setups in anno domini 2017. It'd be just like they never left.

>>16964127

File: 1491349966187.jpg (43KB, 820x820px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 820x820px

>>16962814
>>16962808
>>16962804
>>16962802
>>16962800

>>16962800
Ride height is too low and there is barely any room for suspension travel, so no.

>>16962800
the absolute madmen

>>16962800
looks like a hotwheels

>>16964108
I think I still prefer alienposting

>>16963222
No its not

>>16963165
>>16963088
>>16963161
>>16963156
These posts already summed up the answer to this thread.
Stop dreaming retards.

>>16966435
>stop dreaming
Only retards say this.

File: Toyota-Supra-Spy-Shot-11.jpg (434KB, 1600x1015px) Image search: [Google]

434KB, 1600x1015px

Why has no one posted this and put dreamers in their place? The new Supra will be shit, and nothing like the ft-1.

It's a shame, but true.

>>16962800
I hope not, it's hideous

>>16967798
It looks like an 86 with a fucked up front end.

>>16967798
>4 cylinder engine
Of course it'll be shit. A TTV6 should be the base engine. Who the fuck would buy this manure cart when you can get a Z5 with an I6 that can't possibly be this fucking ugly even if BMW brought bangle back?

>>16967798
>>16962800
>>16962802
>>16962804
>>16962808
>>16962814

Oh boy! Another fugly bloated looking car with tiny windows, C pillars so thick you could hide a firetruck on the other side of them and bizarre creases scattered randomly across its bodywork.

What the fuck happened to this industry

>>16970346
>>16970376
After looking at it for so long, I like it.

>>16971052
What could you possibly like about it? It's a mess of modern cliches

File: 1491067593582.jpg (5KB, 310x253px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 310x253px

>>16971052
It's fucking shite. What comes with it? Where the fuck is the purpose to it? If Wihte people were actually going in a healthy direction of going into the future with a new hip culture attached to it and this was the car, I could understand it more. However, everything is stagnant, we're being bred out and only rich fags will buy this to be utter cunts.

At least with the Charger, Supra, Range Rover etc., they were in their own fields and had certain characteristics. All this car has is an ugly (((futuristic))) design with no fucking soul.

>hey goyim remember when cars were good well we're not doing that anymore
>buy this 90's car for 10 times what it used to be

File: IMG_9840.png (267KB, 344x389px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 344x389px

>>16962800
That shit looks like a fucked up Viper

>>16962898
Try $60k, newfriend.