2017 Mercedes Benz GLC63(S) Coupe

File: Mercedes-Benz-GLC63_S_AMG_Coupe-2018-1280-06.jpg (518KB, 2512x934px) Image search: [Google]

518KB, 2512x934px

>>16959646
They are the only vehicles in their segment to be powered by an eight-cylinder biturbo engine

File: 14594206452_13b7b2bf52_o.jpg (173KB, 1326x768px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 1326x768px

>as wide as an S-Class
>compact
I want the crossover meme to end. Also the GLC coupe shape is the most retarded fucking shit since the BMW X6.

And I'd rather have a C-Class wagon.

File: Mercedes-Benz-GLC63_S_AMG-2018-1280-11.jpg (632KB, 2424x870px) Image search: [Google]

632KB, 2424x870px

>>16959657
The AMG 4.0-litre V8 biturbo engine puts out 350 kW (476 hp) or 375 kW (510 hp) with a max. torque of 650 or 700 Nm.

The top speed is 250 km/h (electronically limited).

File: Mercedes-Benz-GLC63_S_AMG_Coupe-2018-1600-22.jpg (577KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

577KB, 1600x1200px

>>16959669
I like the shape on the GLC Coupe. It's just a preference.

File: Mercedes-Benz-GLC63_S_AMG_Coupe-2018-1280-21.jpg (59KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1280x960px

>>16959684

File: Mercedes-Benz-GLC63_S_AMG-2018-1600-17.jpg (293KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 1600x1200px

>>16959691
So whatchya think?

>>16959684
And I prefer to call your taste absolute shit.

>>16959698
I honestly like the shape although I hate crossovers, how much is this trim level going for?

probably a good fucking vehicle.

I just dislike the people driving it, it's an asshole meme machine like the X6.
I hate that fucking segment.

>>16959646
shitty crossover. power doesn't make it better. yawn.

/thread

File: Mercedes-Benz-GLC63_S_AMG_Coupe-2018-1280-0b.jpg (389KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

389KB, 1280x960px

>>16959702
Well, I don't mind your opinion.

>>16959709
Unfortunately I can't find the prices anywhere. It's just said everywhere that it'll go on sale at the end of 2017.

Forgot to add the 0-60 times.
>4.0 seconds.

>>16959646
I'd rather buy the C class

>>16959646
C for the city. GLC for country house in the mountains.

>>16959839
>mombomber
>country

>>16959848
What?

>>16959851
I'm saying that the extra inch of ground clearance isn't going to make a difference over a regular car, especially with those huge wheels and thin sport tires.

File: 1421977174663.png (239KB, 421x433px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 421x433px

>>16959669
>build GLK, which turns out to be their most reliable car
>scrap it and replace it with a fat C class

>>16959857
It's two inches and it makes a tremendous difference in winter. Also only GLC is AWD as stated in OP.

>>16959857
since they will never leave tarmac they will never find out though. they just like to believe they could off-road.

>>16959864
it doesn't make a difference at all. A stanced piece of shit with a TC off button will do better in winter.

>>16959864
AWD on summer tires on snow is a recipe for a bad time.

>>16959868
Okay, sweetie, whatever you say. Go play in the benchracing thread now.
>>16959872
Why would you drive on summer tires in the winter?

>>16959891
BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT IT COMES WITH

>>16959913
Are you mentally challenged?

>>16959864
>Also only GLC is AWD as stated in OP.
*sport tires puncture on gravel*
*AWD rendered useless*

>>16960078
>tires puncture on gravel
>it's another contrarian busrider tries to argue episode

>all that money just to look like a soccermom dropping kids off at the meth clinic

>>16960048
the kind of people that buy these are idiots that think awd will save them so they don't bother changing tires.

>>16960176
There are lots of dumb people doing dumb things, the thread isn't about them it's about a car. Also:
>being so frustrated by your own poorfaggotry you have to bring up that richer people are definitely idiots at every opportunity
Try not being poor.

>>16960205
>just because i can't afford a car i'm not allowed to have an opinion

>>16960205
I don't have to be retarded enough to buy this pile of bullshit before being allowed to criticize it, you enormous fucking cunt.

>>16960309
Of course you can have an opinion. We've yet to hear it, though. So far you've only rambled about people who can afford it, not the car itself.

File: 1491068335275.png (563KB, 3000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

563KB, 3000x2000px

>>16960326
>to smart too not be poor
This is some next level mental gymnastics, my mang.

>>16960330
the car is pointless shit.