GT cars

File: Integra_R_1.jpg (15KB, 423x177px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 423x177px

Here's mine

>>16933187
>rock hard suspension
>back seat has virtually no headroom
Not a GT car, sorry. Neat sports car though

>>16933187
No

File: gbodycalender2_zps531efef7.jpg (2MB, 3263x2291px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3263x2291px

My favorite has to be G-body Monte Carlos. You can do a lot if you build them in the Pro Touring style.

>>16933216
>no back seat period
>completely useless trunk
Not a GT car.

File: images (2).jpg (21KB, 470x313px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 470x313px

>>16933157
Pure sex

File: 1489340825170.jpg (677KB, 1600x960px) Image search: [Google]

677KB, 1600x960px

>>16933187
>>16933216
This isn't a favorite coupes thread. This is a favorite GT cars thread. Think less about performance, and more about luxury comforts.

File: 2bf10cddd3e2d58bb2ff8e3ef265f58f.jpg (60KB, 680x453px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 680x453px

M3s count right? I fit all my friends in my E30 comfortably (not an m3)

File: 20161128_000508.png (943KB, 713x718px) Image search: [Google]

943KB, 713x718px

>>16933283
No

>>16933290
Lol butthurt

File: maxresdefault.jpg (307KB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 1800x1200px

8th gen Accord V6

Cuz reliable, cheap parts and fast enough to roast most shitboxes and old muscle enough to make a point.

>>16933283
E30's don't have enough rear seat space. E36's and newer 3 series count though.

>>16933679
Not a GT car.
Not big enough
Not comfy enough
Not enough rear seat room
Not enough trunk space.

>2 door sedan

What?

File: Ford_Probe_GT_I.jpg (208KB, 1500x846px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1500x846px

I love my long white Probe.

File: chevrolet-monte-carlo-g-body.jpg (294KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 1600x1200px

>>16933726
The G-body cars like the Monte Carlo, Regal and Grand Prix are classified as 2 door sedans. Sedan doesn't automatically mean 4 doors. Sedan means a certain about of rear seat room. On 2 door sedans, it's a measurement of headroom and legroom that determines if it's classified as a coupe or sedan.
Pic related is a 2 door sedan.

>>16933737
not enough rear seat room.

>>16933747
Have you ever sat in one?

>>16933755
yes. not enough rear headroom. Be enough rear seat room, I mean sitting full grown adults back there, not children.

Let's add a twist to this

I'm not OP but
What if it had to be 2010+?
What would you pick then?

>>16933685
Your opinion.
Plenty comfy, rear seats are fine, its a fuckin hatchback with enough cargo space, powerful engine for its class (DOHC 1.8L).

You just made this thread to shoot down every fuckin car that gets posted. A 2 door coupe/sedan is only going to have so much rear seat and trunk room. Under your specs an 80s Caprice two door with GT badges would suffice.

File: IMG_1204.jpg (52KB, 720x417px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 720x417px

>>16933157
>>16933199
>>16933329
I don't get this "no back seat space" thing
I am quite sure that my 300zx twin turbo is a gt car, and the back seats can only fit one person if they sit sideways across them.
Also super gt cars like Aston Martin db9s and the like aren't actually gt cars because they have no back seat?

File: IMG_0535.jpg (311KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

311KB, 1280x853px

Ahhh yeah bitches

>>16933740
Sedan for American cars generally means there is a door post not the size of the backseat

>>16933785
No backseat
Not a GT

File: IMG_0536.jpg (757KB, 1622x1080px) Image search: [Google]

757KB, 1622x1080px

>>16933801
You were saying?

>>16933157
>>have a large, usable back seat

Immediately disqualifies the car in the OP and 90% of all cars that are considered "GT."

>>16933801
Dummy.

File: 14853142_10154486835285552_6013877634740163818_o.jpg (351KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

351KB, 2048x1536px

>>16933179
my dude

>>16933812
Not enough legroom
Not enough headroom
Not a GT

>>16933820
No

File: cigarette.gif (1MB, 365x205px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 365x205px

>>16933801
>Ferrari FF
>no back seat

Are you some kind of moron?

File: IMG_0537.jpg (242KB, 792x855px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 792x855px

>>16933826
Oh yeah? A fag like you could fit.

Pic very related

>>16933826
>reaching because he was wrong

>NO BACK SEAT
>UHHHHH
>NOT ENOUGH ROOM
>I'LL NEVER JUST ADMIT I WAS WRONG ON AN ANONYMOUS BOARD!!!!!

File: maxresdefault[1].jpg (76KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1280x720px

A proper GT here.

2018 BMW 4 series

>>16933841
except youre all dumbfucks and autistic. Its a shooting brake

>>16933826
I think you could be mildly autistic.

File: IMG_4668.jpg (59KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 800x533px

>comfy
>hushed interior
>not a raucous sounding v8 m model
>inline 6 silky smooth glory
>cushy straight line goings combined with smart precise handling
>fucking below 10k these days
>4k dollars gets you 600hp (single turbo, tuning, and double walbro 450 setup)

>>16933783
>Also super gt cars like Aston Martin db9s and the like aren't actually gt cars because they have no back seat?
right. The entire point of a GT car is to have fun, go on prolonged roadtrips in comfort, with the family, hence the back seat.

>>16933839
That's a GT car, but that's cutting it close on headroom

>>16933893
That's a GT car

>>16933788
You're thinking of a 2 door post sedan, not a plain 2 door sedan.

File: acura legend.jpg (139KB, 1200x838px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1200x838px

>>16933157
Patrician taste coming through

File: White_Pontiac_Grand_Prix.jpg (203KB, 1016x762px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 1016x762px

not exactly powerful by today's standards, but comfy non the less

>>16933944
The GTP versions were powerful with the 3.4L DOHC V6.

File: cache.jpg (405KB, 1024x681px) Image search: [Google]

405KB, 1024x681px

>no vibration
>c o m f y leather interior
>lots of creature comforts like GPS
>300hp and capable of much more

Cosmo a best

>>16933966
That backseat tho...

File: 92 z34.jpg (122KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1024x768px

>>16933955
Interesting, didn't know they made a GTP version. I always thought the z34 was the only w-body to receive the 3.4

>tfw haven't seen one of these glorious 90s land barges on the road in some time now

File: 1470539106448.jpg (928KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

928KB, 2048x1536px

>>16933972
Yeah. But damn tho

File: DSC_0324.jpg (94KB, 978x650px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 978x650px

>>16933972
>Implying you wouldn't fall asleep from the warm hug of leather

>>16933987
I'd wake up from my back aching due to the shit ergonomics of that "backseat"

NOT A GT

>>16933975
Nope. the 3.4 was used in:
1991-1994 Chevrolet Lumina Z34
1991-1994 Chevrolet Lumina Euro3.4
1991-1996 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP
1991-1996 Pontiac Grand Prix SE (optional)
1991-1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme (They were particularly popular in the Oldsmobile exclusive convertibles)
1995-1997 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Z34
1995-1997 Chevrolet Lumina LS (optional)
1997 Chevrolet Lumina LTZ (optional. Unicorn level rare. There's a record of 7 being built)

>>16933994
That 3.4L sure likes to piss coolant all over the place. Every single one of them ate gaskets

>>16934013
And the timing chain had to be replaced every 60k miles

File: 1389914506104.png (545KB, 575x536px) Image search: [Google]

545KB, 575x536px

>>16934013
>>16934070
I had a 3.4. never pissed coolant and never had a problem with the timing chain. I did have problems with the timing belt though (yes, it has both)

This entire thread is for people to post cars and have OP determine if he feels they're a GT car.

Holy cucks.

File: 1253846616662.png (8KB, 533x362px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 533x362px

>>16933992
You're full of shit.

How could you fall asleep in that?

>>16934127
OP isn't the only one here determining if something's a GT car.

Source: I'm OP

File: 1222143886273.jpg (588KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

588KB, 1600x1200px

>>16934127
Cagers, amirite?

>>16934139
Nice kit car.

File: 1e5a10ca15aea6a7663e06eebfeb4310_toyota-supra-back-seats-toyota-toyota-supra-interior-back-seat_640-480.jpg (81KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 640x480px

>toyota supra
>barely any headroom
>barely any legroom
>still a GT car

>>16934145
Kinda.
https://www.supercars.net/blog/2006-weineck-cobra-780-cui-limited-edition/

>>16934146
I remember sitting in one of the MKIII's, I had to lean into the rearview LoS, no room to lead towards a window.

File: 9e666a5a5b95fd84478946a51a7891a8.jpg (2MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x1536px

Move over, peasants

File: 1988-Monte-Carlo-Power-Tour.jpg (585KB, 1502x688px) Image search: [Google]

585KB, 1502x688px

>>16934187
Fite me

File: landscape-1462289981-gt-r.jpg (79KB, 980x490px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 980x490px

I just want to see OP tell me why this isn't a GT car

>>16934203
but it is. I was wonderin when some weeb would post it. I don't like them but it is a GT car.

>>16933783
>Z32 2+2
>GT car
>Z32 2 seater
>not GT car

I think OP just has retarded definitions for a GT car. Keeps talking about rear headroom yet he posts a Soarer which has only enough headroom for an Asian woman.

File: 392.jpg (397KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 1280x853px

>built on the W210 E-class platform and the front double-wishbone suspension from the W220 S-class
>485 hp/475 lb-ft 6.4 L V8
>119 inch wheelbase
>3 mode adaptive suspension

Challenger is a pretty great GT car

File: [email protected] (139KB, 2000x982px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 2000x982px

>>16933848

Taste. Half of these posts are trash

File: jaguar mk2.jpg (1MB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1280px

space grace and pace

>>16934218
>4 doors
no.

File: 99 pontiac.png (1MB, 1388x539px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1388x539px

>GT car
>not focused on the driver and passenger, with space for luggage

>>16933826
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_tourer#/media/File:Ferrari-250-GT-Berlinetta-1.jpg
uh huh

>>16934222
complains about lack of room and comfort
but does not want a long wheel base
this entire thread is a waste full of dumb asses

>>16934259
you're a fucking idiot who doesn't know what a gt is, now fuck off

>>16934264
no the op is an idiot for thinking a gt even has to have rear seats
>current year
>being specific about a vague term

>>16933911
>with the family
Umm no sweetie x

File: 2014-Mazda-CX-5-Grand-Touring-front-three-quarter-in-motion-22.jpg (1MB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1360px

Hey there OP :^)

File: 92a5255bf93316932a90c31a458728a6.jpg (95KB, 736x529px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 736x529px

>>16933157
>tfw this matches your description

>>16934278
no. On every level.

>>16934296
Trunk space can't be taken up by people. or dead bodies.

File: AR-160819903.jpg (618KB, 3000x2002px) Image search: [Google]

618KB, 3000x2002px

>>16934299
Christ, you're dumb. This is alsa a GT car, and nothing you say will change that.

>>16934308
>more than 2 doors
>GT
no.

>>16934317
But you're wrong. I mean you are objectively wrong. That is a GT car, and you are fucking retarded.

>>16934326
>doesn't know what a GT car is

File: 2017-mazda-3-japanese-spec_100558366_h.jpg (236KB, 1920x952px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 1920x952px

>>16934337

>>16934354
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_car

>>16934368
Please tell Mazda that their grand touring models are, in fact, not grand tourers.

>>16934383
will do. emailing now.

>>16933783
Just fixed a TT, I'm in love

File: Black SM.jpg (341KB, 1280x823px) Image search: [Google]

341KB, 1280x823px

that noise, that handling, that comfort...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9D9YgMD85OM

File: 4518986028.jpg (601KB, 1136x852px) Image search: [Google]

601KB, 1136x852px

what about the old and new E class coupes and the 6 series
and this one

>>16934475
absolute masterpiece of a car.
I still see them around sometimes

>>16934592
mmm yes....

File: images (59).jpg (26KB, 525x280px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 525x280px

>>16933157
2 doors.....

>>16934647
>posts a sport sedan instead of a GT car

File: Img_0815m.jpg (400KB, 900x675px) Image search: [Google]

400KB, 900x675px

>>16934649
It is literally called a GT...

>>16934662
A trim level is not the same thing anon.

File: Maserati_Gran_Turismo_V8.jpg (666KB, 1920x1160px) Image search: [Google]

666KB, 1920x1160px

>"A grand tourer (Italian: gran turismo) (GT) is a performance and luxury automobile capable of high speed and long-distance driving. The most common format is a two-door coupé with either a two-seat or a 2+2 arrangement."

Fuck your no legroom.

>>16933826
Amerifat detected

File: Ford-Mustang-Gt-Red.jpg (278KB, 1280x850px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 1280x850px

>Nobody has posted the only GT that really matters

kys's

File: K0000287485.jpg (99KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1280x960px

:^)

File: a9f3be07e0d35f7b158e0e390ec48ced.jpg (94KB, 1200x630px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 1200x630px

>have a large, usable back seat

wait, what? since when a GT car need to have backseats?

File: maxresdefault.jpg (544KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

544KB, 2048x1536px

>>16933157
>No Aston Martin in this thread
Personally I would choose this.

File: mk_8_11.jpg (179KB, 720x343px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 720x343px

Trying to snag a MKVIII this weekend /o/ wish we luck.

>>16935220
Good luck. Let us know how it goes.

>>16935030

>large useable, back seat

Yeah if you're midget

>>16935239
OP here. Brother had an S13 hatch. Back seat wasn't that bad, but then I was like 5'5 at the time.

File: fdf05a8f85171dc2bc1af7575403fd7d.jpg (146KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 800x600px

>>16933992
RUDE

>>16935239
so you're striking the S13 but let the 350Z through?

File: 78c68a4bca2d3dabb44825299023020c.jpg (237KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 2048x1365px

Accept no substitutes.

>>16935256

Going off of personal experience. Brother-in-law had a Z32, no back seat. and I couldn't picture them having one. A friend had a 91 240sx with rear seats. I was Slav squatting with a seat belt.

File: golf.jpg (56KB, 729x486px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 729x486px

>>16933157
>Have 2 door body styles
Czech
>have a large, usable back seat
Czech
>have a large usable trunk
Czech
>be comfy on long journeys
Czech
>have a powerful engine
Czech

File: mercedes-500-sec-09.jpg (357KB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 1800x1200px

>>16935265
step aside pleb

File: 2003-volkswagen-golf-r32-1_1600x0w.jpg (142KB, 1600x1152px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1600x1152px

>>16935302
If that was an R32, then yes. Otherwise no.

>>16935306
Too fucking big. I wanna be able to go to the Mediterranean without feeling like I'm piloting an aircraft carrier through a needle eye.

>>16934203
It's not a Gt because it is a Gt-r

File: 1983_Mercedes-Benz_500_SEC_AMG_01.jpg (133KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 1600x900px

>>16935317
So track down the AMG bits

>>16935344
I don't see how that makes it smaller.

>>16934592

>those lines

Why is it so perfect.

>>16935351
It doesn't, but it makes it feel smaller.

>>16935356
That makes no sense.

>>16935362
If the suspension is tight enough, a big car can feel a lot smaller than it really is. I first experience that driving a Monte Carlo Z34. Only time that car felt big was when I had to parallel park it.

>>16935307
The GTI models are plenty powerful and comfy as well.
They just look way more boring than they drive.

>>16935372
I drove a 1.8 turbo GTI. No.

File: IMG_0124.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

My car fits this description. 1988 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe

>>16935386
My bad. I glanced over the disgraceful non VR GTIs

VR6 GTIs are goat though.

>>16933264
god I miss my 2005 GTO, hands down favorite vehicle I've owned

>>16935437
>VR6 GTIs are goat though.
but rare. 90% of them are 1.8 Turbos.

>A grand tourer (Italian: gran turismo) (GT) is a performance and luxury automobile capable of high speed and long-distance driving. The most common format is a two-door coupé with either a two-seat or a 2+2 arrangement.

OP you're a fucking mong

>>16933187
I drive one. I never take that fucker out on dirt or hard roads. Great fun and highway driver but once you hit a single pot hole or bump in the road you feel that shit.

>>16933870
>Its a shooting brake
Not part of OP's criteria dumbass.

>>16936110
Shooting Brakes are NOT a GT

>>16936154
Why not?

>>16933761
can confirm true, friend has an '89. unless you're under 5'10" your head will be touching the back window

>>16934662
That GT stands for "Gran Turismo" not "Grand Touring" you dolt.

>>16938375
what do you think Gran Turismo means?

File: Plymouth Barracuda fold down rear seat.jpg (229KB, 1357x621px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 1357x621px

Are there any modern(ish) GT cars you can sleep in?

>>16937190
It seems they forgot about the interior on that trash

>>16938400
It's just a name.

File: 100216-01-1991_Ford_Thunderbird_front_three_quarter_view_from_Ford_media_archives-320x193[1].jpg (16KB, 320x193px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 320x193px

>>16933157
What is 10th generation Tunderbird.

>2 doors
>comfy back seat
>comfy seats period, great for journeys
>trunk for days
>V8 power

>>16933783
People on here only call the Z32 a "gt car" as an insult. Don't take them seriously.

OP's rules are stupid. GT cars don't need back seats, especially not ones that are large. Who the fuck takes their kids along on a "grand tour"? You're supposed to take your 25 year old mistress, dumbass.

>>16938470
>What is 10th generation Tunderbird.
disgusting shit

>>16935220
Those things look like a pretty great, fast, cheap coupe, please do tell how it goes, might pick one up myself over the summer

>>16938520
Well you could say it's a sports car I suppose. Compared to my flat mates fd it's not particularly sporty; if you don't have jutties the stock suspension is floaty, it's heavy af, but also the most comfortable car I've ever driven, has heaps of power and handles high speeds really well. I would say it's a gt car.

File: images (61).jpg (24KB, 523x281px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 523x281px

>>16938375
And this?

>>16940243
That could be a GT car, depending on the back seat.

>>16936286
what the fuck were they thinking

Everyone in this thread is retarded

>>16938375
>That GT stands for "Gran Turismo" not "Grand Touring" you dolt.

Welcome to /o/

>>16935220
Best of luck, I love mine even though I got it with some abuse.

File: 1481970436427.jpg (13KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 320x240px

>>16938425

File: vanquishgal1[1].jpg (82KB, 1000x666px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1000x666px

This is the most perfect bait thread that has ever existed. We will never again see anything like it.

>>16933157
>looking for Lexuses anyway
>see this thread
>"alright, let's also check for an SC400"
>three in total
>one here in Germany
>one in the US
>one in Estonia
Ah yes, so it wasn't sold here.