GM BTFO!!!!!1!!

A manual beat an automatic? Holy shit, stop the press.

>>16910817
Does it matter? Who buys an automatic camaro for """"performance""""

>>16910817
Wait, the lap time on a 2.5 mile course was within 1/3rd of a second and you're making a thread why? That's good for an automatic. More than acceptable for non-racing normal drivers on the road.

>>16910876
Because GM can't compete

>>16910817
GM btfo by GM, how can GM even recover?

>When will you guys face up to the fact auto is faste...

>>16910817
More like autotragic fags btfo
>muh superior lap times because the machine does all the work for me

>>16911029
>>16911036
Stop making retarded threads

File: 2017_Chevrolet_Camaro_ZL1_front_three_quarter_burnout_e1482297740407.jpg (60KB, 660x429px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 660x429px

The zl1 auto was apparently faster they just didn't record it.

http://www.motortrend.com/cars/chevrolet/camaro/2017/2017-chevrolet-camaro-zl1-first-test-brute-squad-goals/

> Randy strongly felt there were some tenths left in the automatic ZL1. He worked with a couple of engineers from Chevy and kept adjusting tire pressures and lapping. The result? An unofficial lap time of 1:25.87, recorded on the ZL1’s optional Performance Data Recorder (PDR). AMcLaren 650SSpider—a mid-engine, 3,239-pound, 641-horsepower, carbon-fiber supercar—does a 1:25.88. Yes, you read that right. The quarter-million-dollar McLaren got beat by a Camaro. But because our test team didn’t run the numbers—meaning we don’t have a Vbox data file of the lap—we have to asterisk Randy’s lunchtime lap. It’s simply not official. These things happen.

File: IMG_0148.jpg (274KB, 1620x1080px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 1620x1080px

American cars don't need a million gears or DCT because they have torque

>>16910817
>How will they ever recover?
You are a silly boy. A part of GM beating another part of GM doesn't count as BTFO. And besides, just Chevrolet alone is the most awarded car maker in the last 3 years running of all the car makes out there.

>>16911098
No

>>16911105
>we fiddle with the car and run it again and again and again and again and again
>huur it beat the lap time of a car we put around the track a few times at most in different conditions
Why does motortrend always do this with gm shit

>>16910817
>GM BTFO themselves
what
also
>10-speed automatic
fucking why

>>16911593
They are clearly biased toward GM. There is a noticeable disappointment in their tone when the GT-R beat the Z06 around the track in that video from years back.

>Slower than 1:25.7
Gtr wins again
Gm btfo

>>16910838
Holy Beautiful