9th gen Accord

>>16906678
>spending 15k on a car
>i'm poor
No you're not. If you're so poor get a civic for 3k. Also,
>sport
>cvt
those things are mutually exclusive. The CVT is shit and kills any fun the car might have been.

>>16906824
point taken but im not getting it as a sporty sedan, i can do better for 15k.

how bad is the cvt? i drove a friend's EX with the 4cyl and it was acceptable for what it is, so i really dont think i'd mind it. definitely would test drive beforehand tho

The V6 doesn't have a cvt so get that.

Otherwise just get a 2011-2012 8th gen without the CVT if you want a 4banger, pretty much the same shit and cheaper with a 5spd auto.

>>16906850
the only accords worth buying are the sport in manual or the ex/ex-l v6 or the coupe with the v6 and the manual. You should be able to find a manual acura tsx or tl too. Are you trying to finance or pay cash?

>>16906975
true, but 9th gen or something else is what im thinking. a friend has the 8th gen and its straight up fugly
>>16906998
im aiming for a manual sport, but if i cant find it i was aiming towards CVT. idk about V6 because it looks ugly and getting it to look like a sport is just extra money.

>>16907646
>buying the sport because of the looks
>hurr durr 18in ramzzzzz
kill yourself.

>>16907672
This.
Just get a fucking v6 9th gen with less than 30k mileage on it and you will be fine as fuck.

You can get an Optima SX turbo for less than that. It doesn't handle sporty but it's powerful and still gets good gas mileage.

>>16908178
Or OP can opt for a Hyundai Sonata if he cares more about luxury.
Pleather, panoramic roof, Apple Carplay, radar cruise control, lane departure, etc. All the luxury features are standard and/or cheaper on the Sonata for similar money.

>>16906678
Hold out for a manual you homo.mmypu don't need instant gratification.