Why are people always mistaking my 63 belair for a 64 impala?

who cares theyre basically the same car and not everyone is autistic enough to learn year to year differences

yours is just a lower trim Impala anyway

>>16906694

Black guys and mexicans think my car is a piece of shit because it's a four door and not an impala though.

Also it doesn't make sense.
If you don;t know the shape and year model don't call it something it's not.

Imagine if I went up to someones 92 integra and started saying oh man that's a real nice 88 civic.

People would think I'm retarded and they'd be right. Yet people always do that with my chevy.

>>16906670
all americans of that era looks the same. nobody gives two chits famo

>>16906804
That still doesn't answer the question.

Because Eazy-E

>>16906707

>caring about the opinions of niggers and wetbacks

>>16906707
that means they'll never try to steal it. be thankful

>>16906670
My first car was a 67 Impala SS. I can't tell you how many times people told me nice Chevelle.

>>16906707
Well 4 doors are trash

>>16906723
That's a wild difference from mistaking 2 Chevies built on the same platform 1 year apart. Just correct them pleasantly and be on your way.

>>16908300
You wouldn't say that if you saw how 90 percent of people think my 63 belair is a 64 impala even though it looks nothing like one.

Who gives a fuck?

>better question

>>16906707
>people think my lower trim four door compared to their high trim two door
That's literally what people would have thought when the car was new. KYS

>>16909979
Lots of people.

Maybe not on /o/ because it's not a weeb car.

>>16909997
I don't undestand that sentence.

>>16906804
All cars of a particular era look the same, idiota