which car is the more meme

Rx-7

Brings nothing to the table that other sports cars offer while being less reliable on top of it. The MR2 is the cheapest way to get a mid rear engined fun car.

>>16895538
i... can't really argue this

>>16895538
>performance rotary sports car
>brings nothing to the table

>muh mr chassis

>>16895538
> driving a le mans winning engine design
> driving the best looking sports car of the 90s

>>16895538
Except for being lighter, cheaper, less maintenance intensive, and more fun than most high performance sports cars.

>>16895538
>less reliable
Just change the fucking oil and don't overheat it.

>>16895557
It's not lighter, cheaper, or less maintenance intensive than a mr2

>>16895612
>high performance

>>16895633
I ignored that one fucker :(

>>16895612
it's not as slow either, won't need internals for a power increase
>>16895633
also this, only the turbo sw20 can be considered high performance

>itt people try to justify their impractical sports car purchasing decisions

>>16895648
Zzw30 only needs a 2zz to spank any rx7

>>16895814
With a lot of luck, maybe. But you're replacing the entire engine. In that case, I'd like to see any MR2 outclass a three-rotor.

>>16895814
Not even close

>>16895567
FD owner here; that is absolutely not true. Oil and temperature are the biggest concerns, but any number of things can go wrong with these cars. Mine breaks in some form at least 1-3 times a month.

>>16895888
I was thinking more in terms of FC... But yeah, I've heard FDs are extremely finicky, to say the least.

rx7 by far
I6 power with V8 fuel consumption
>"b-but add my rotors!! and a turbo!"
great now you have forced induction I6 power with Z06 fuel economy

File: images.jpg (25KB, 470x313px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 470x313px

>>16895903
The z06 doesnt consume any gas because it explodes after a lap

>>16895914
kek

>>16895903
13B engines could easily reach V8 power, and the RX7 is 2/3 the weight.

>>16895942
>>13B engines could easily reach V8 power
>3mpg
>>RX7 is 2/3 the weight.
thats great and all but the fuel economy would seriously be shit, like really shit
at that point I'd just get a V8 and deal with the extra 150lbs

>>16895958
Ok?
So do that.
Good to know you need 5.7L to compete with 1.3L

>>16895965
yep, more power and better fuel economy, better in every way

File: jh_ebay_07-23-09.jpg (185KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 1200x900px

>>16895983
Lol. Sure thing bud

>>16895900
Oh, well that's valid. I've heard of single owner N/A FC's lasting as long as 200k miles. The main issue with the FD's is the complexity of the sequential twins, and all of the vacuum hoses, solenoids, and sensors needed as a result. The motors themselves also don't last as long, of course, because of the extra strain from the stock boost.

Even with upgraded seals and cooling, I have no idea how many miles the enthusiasts get out of their FD's which they often switch to single turbos and run 20+ PSI on.

>>16895552
>> driving a le mans winning engine design
The Ford windsor engine is a le-mans winning engine design so you could potentially be driving one with a Fox body stang.

>>16895532
I love both

>>16895532
Who ever memes the MR2?

The RX7 is memed much more frequently than the MR2. Most people barely know anything about the AW11 to the ZZW30.

>>16896752
Most people dont know anything about the RX7 either.
>hurr durr apex seals
Thats all they know. It has apex seals... thats it.

File: quick rundown.gif (1MB, 380x380px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 380x380px

>>16896760
Give me a quick rundown on the RX7.

>>16896770
I would. If you werent memeing

>>16895965
>1.3L meme
>actually closer to 3L

File: z737.jpg (23KB, 353x270px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 353x270px

>>16896770
It's literally the fastest car ever made and pistoncucks can never compete

File: $_57.jpg (291KB, 757x1024px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 757x1024px

>>16895538
mr2 is a slow girls car that poorfags jerk over because muh aw11 wedge and muh kavninsky autism bullshit

rx7s are some of the greatest sports cars ever built, destroying their competition on the street and on the race track

File: corvetteshit.png (523KB, 1230x387px) Image search: [Google]

523KB, 1230x387px

>>16896781
>being this retarded
how 'close to 3l' is it? and give an explanation why

>>16896786
be careful not to trigger the gmcucks too hard

File: 1487903891829.png (433KB, 461x443px) Image search: [Google]

433KB, 461x443px

>>16896778
Sorry senpai, I just want to know more. I'm autistic and can only communicate through memes.

>select all images with cars

>>16896798
because Mazda just just took the size of one chamber of each rotor and used it as a marketing ploy, despite the fact that it displaces 2 point whatever chambers per rotation.

>>16896821
See, you have zero idea what you are talking about

>despite the fact that it displaces 2 point whatever chambers per rotation
per rotation of what? per rotation of the eshaft? in that case it only displaces 656cc per rotor for a 13b, which is 1.3l

>>16896882
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mazda_Wankel_engine#Displacement