What went wrong?

>>16871304
Ford

File: O5iCnFtu.jpg (24KB, 484x484px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 484x484px

>>16871304

File: Opel-Logo-Blitz.png (323KB, 1181x914px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 1181x914px

>>16871806
like fucking always

>>16871312
>>16871806
You're both right.

From the beginning to 1993 they insisted on doing things their way as best they could with little concern for profit. From 1994 to death GM fucked with them.

GM could have certainly handled the brand better, but even before that the simply didn't appear to be to interested in profit.
>Hey Sven let's build a front wheel drive car
>O.k. Kristof but what about torque steer.
>I know Sven will mount the engine longitudenal so the drive shafts will be equal length.. oh and let's go ahead put the engine in backwards to
> Cool Kristof, where are we going to find a transmission for it
>Sven, we will design our own so it will be unique to the car, that way we can absorb all the development costs and not share any of the r and d budget. That way we alone will have to spend more and more money to update it.
>Cool idea Kristof, will we use this transmission on our other cars
>No Sven we will only use it on the 99 and 900, that way the transmission will only be used for those cars. So updating it will be really expensive,, and we won't be able to keep up with the engines increasing power output. For our other fwd car we will go ahead and mount the engine transverse... But of course we will develop a new transmission for that to, just because.

>>16871304
I loved my 9-2x aero and 9-3 aero.

Wish they would come back but not with those chink shits.

File: saab-cars-logo-historie1.jpg (83KB, 900x800px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 900x800px

>>16872024
> not with those chink shits

Chink shits dropped the SAAB brand name and are now forcing lol Nevs