Which is the better car?

>>16869756
challenger

>car
Mustang
>muscle barge
Challenger
>Transformers highschooler shit tub
Camero

>>16869756
Best*

BMW M3

>camaro: best performance of the 3 but can't see out of it

>mustang: good performance as well but not as fast as the new camaro

>challenger: most comfortable but it's huge and heavy and not as fast as the other 2

Just buy whatever you think looks best

>>16869756
Camaro - LOL CAN'T TURN OR SEE OUT OF
Challenger - LOL CAN'T TURN
Mustang - LOL CAN'T TURN

I drive a Mustang so Mustang

the best looking is the challenger
but it is also the worst performing.... so...

>>16869812
The camaro turns better than your shitbox civic or nissan gtr ever will you fucking shill.

>>16869873
Joke's on you, I don't even own a car.

Camaro is the fastest and most track ready. The memes on visibility aren't really true. Takes a while to get used too
Challenger is best daily and stays true to muscle cars. Stupid power. No brakes or turning
Mustang has looks I guess. Doesn't really excel anywhere except in fleet sales kek

>>16869873
least the GT-R is faster than your cuckmaro

>>16869922
>memes aren't really true
>takes a while to get used to

Well? Which one is it?

>>16869795
Are you talking about the standard trims?
I heard something about the Challenger being the fastest muscle car ever built.

Challenger because it's comfy and looks gud. Nobody here even races and most of you don't even have cars so stop saying Camaro is best just because it's better on a track.

>>16869756
do you mean the best or just better? either way every one has its ups and downs so really, pick whichever one you like the most. personally i'd pick a vee ate camero because i'm a gm fangirl

>>16870035
Camaro is also significantly more reliable.

>>16870052
U r a gril? Pls b my gf

File: fdgdfgdg1.jpg (33KB, 650x367px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 650x367px

>>16870129
me? depends what and how hard you drive

>>16870140
99 ford Winstar, I don't go above the speed limit.

File: suchversatility.jpg (12KB, 250x145px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 250x145px

>>16870140
Me? Its the McChicken
The best fast food sandwich around

File: i-just-ate-taco-bells-weird-chicken-shell-chalupa-2-24537-1485460317-12_dblbig.jpg (54KB, 625x415px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 625x415px

>>16870171
>not the naked chicken chalupa
Get that gay shit outta here.

>>16870110
This is true Chrysler Group cars are peices of shit.

>>16870140
I don't need a car, where I live the bus can get me close to anywhere

>>16869973
You can see out of it fine, you just have to realize you're driving a sports car and not a sedan so you use the side mirrors more and the inside mirror less, and don't have 75% of the car behind you.

Mustang has the same belt line, just a taller roof.

>>16869784
Nope.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D87tO7VUs2I

>>16869795
THIS

>>16870011
>I heard something about the Challenger being the fastest muscle car ever built.
That was referring to the Challenger SRT Hellcat.
And only in a straight line at the drag strip. The Hellcat can't corner for shit.
I'm pretty sure a base V8 Mustang GT could post better lap times, nevermind the Camaro.

File: 20170319_203220.jpg (2MB, 1938x1452px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1938x1452px

Felt like the Mustang was the better all rounder.

>>16869883
KEK

>>16869756
They all suck.

>>16870220
I didn't think anything else about a 2,5 ton 707hp muscle car.
But I think you don't go racing with those either, they all about the straight line and sounding and looking like they beat something small and fluffy to death with a chain.

File: Dodge-Challenger-SRT-Hellcat-Brakes-1.jpg (1MB, 2432x1824px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2432x1824px

>>16869922
>no brakes

lmao that you think 70-0 in 153 ft is bad...it has 15.4 inch slotted rotors with 6 piston brembos front and 4 piston rear. Doesnt get much better than that unless you add carbon ceramics

>>16870558
>only available on the Hellcat
We're not talking about the Hellcat you moron.
We're talking about the R/T, R/T Scat Pack, and SRT 392 because they're the most comparable to a Mustang GT or Camaro SS
Fuck your Hellcat and Demon shit.

>>16870722
Insult my demon hell demon cat supercharger one more time anon I swear to god.

>>16869756

Performance? Camaro

Well rounded? Mustang

Looks cool? Challenger

>>16870228
Wow

File: 1440445067796.jpg (205KB, 640x500px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 640x500px

>>16870743
Demon and hellcat a shit

File: JohntheBaptist2.jpg (199KB, 480x641px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 480x641px

>>16870722
>this jealous motherfucker

A Hellcat is still a challenger dipshit

File: 1420360769082.jpg (130KB, 637x526px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 637x526px

>>16870928
Mentally challenged maybe, but it can't compete with the Mustang or Camaro.

>>16870750
Basically this, you can all go home now.

>>16869973
Benchracers act as if they will never see out of it which is horseshit. I doubt any of them actually own one let alone driven one.

theyre fine.

File: Capture.png (192KB, 477x193px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 477x193px

>>16870821

File: 1484188276562.png (452KB, 679x670px) Image search: [Google]

452KB, 679x670px

>>16870948
>the good challengers don't count, we can only talk about the shittier ones so that we can still compare it to muh GT and SS

>>16870973
>Choosing challengers within the same price bracket as the SS and GT
>N-NO BUT MUH HELLCAT
>D-DOESNT COUNT

File: IMG_0040.png (427KB, 514x662px) Image search: [Google]

427KB, 514x662px

>>16870981
Sometimes I don't get /o/ usually they all about top trims GT-R, R32, ST and RS but when it get's against their faves they get all defensive.
I mean fact is the Hellcat is the top trim of the Chally why not compare it the mustang boss and whatever the Camaro has?

>>16871044
because it will get BLOWN THE FUCK OUT


hellcat a shit

File: 1486760591890.jpg (102KB, 432x585px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 432x585px

>>16871044
Just wait til the demon comes out. I for one can't wait for the ass-hurt

>B-BUT IT DOESN'T COUNT! THATS NOT A REAL CHALLENGER! IT ISNT FAAAIIIRRR!!!!!

File: jamesmay.jpg (23KB, 446x251px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 446x251px

>>16871062
>HURR OUR CARS CANT TURN
>wat do

i know lets add more POWER because that will make up for the heavy cant turn and unreliability

>>16869756
>mcdonalds, dubshack or burgerking which is best
ftfy

>>16871044
The top trim of the mustang right now is the GT350R, they're not really comparable since one is a track car and one is meant for straight line speed.

A camaro ZL1 would be a more fair comparison to the hellcat, they're pretty even straight line wise I believe(haven't really seen any youtube vids of them drag racing) the ZL1 would absolute rape the hellcat on a track though

>>16871044
>why not compare it the mustang boss and whatever the Camaro has?
well Ford doesn't make the Mustang Boss. But there's the Shelby GT350 with 526 HP.
And the top trim Camaro, currently, is the ZL1 with 650 HP. Although it has been confirmed GM is working on a Z28 to slot above the ZL1 and it's going to get a DOHC V8

>>16871062
I can't wait for the Z28 to come out and lay waste to both of 'em.

Aside from hennessey, who's word has as much weight as hydrogen, no one has directly compared the Hellcat to the Mustang or Camaro.

>>16869756

Top of the line Camaro seems to be the better sports car.
Top of the line Cumstang seems to be unable to decide between muscle car and sports car.
Top of the line Challenger is the ultimate muscle car and the one i'd daily.

>>16869814
daddy bought princess her mustang for her 16th birthday. how cute.

Why do they all look like bright toy cars?

>>16871051
Says the faggot who owns a sonic but would rather take the bus than drive a Hellcat.

File: dataLOL.gif (75KB, 130x130px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 130x130px

>>16871471
Stay mad when i blow your doors off in my sonic while you take the bus since your hellcat is in the shop

BLOWN THE FUG OUT

test drove a scat pack challenger, a mustang GT, and a auto 16 camaro ss. the mustang is a great all-around car. it's like a jack of all trades, master of none. the challenger is a comfy burnout machine, nothing more. the camaro is by far, the most rigid, has the worst visibility of the 3(took some getting used to), but accelerates the best, corners the best, brakes the best. the gt also has a shit chinese 6 speed transmission. i'm guessing the scatpack also comes with a t6060? the one i test drove was an auto.

long story short, drive what you want. i bought a 16camaro ss M6. no regrets whatsoever.

>>16871051
>>16871073
I get the idea that you just shill
>>16871087
Fair enough but do you really race muscle cars on a track, I kinda get the idea that the muscle car is more of Wangan warrior. They kinda combine raw power and luxury. Big fat engines combined with an automatic and a huge seats, I don't get the appeal of racing such cars.

>>16871493
Boils down to this.

>>16871788
>Shill

like both the camaro and mustang


just cant accept FCA cant make gud cars

File: Snapchat-1277602577373474276.jpg (1MB, 1440x2368px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x2368px

I will take my Hellcat over a Camaro or Mustang all day long. At least until I trade it in for a Demon

>>16869859
Who cares. I could look at the challenger all day. I'd love to own one

>>16869756
Challenger

>>16869795
stale pasta is stale

>>16871862
congrats on your 1 trick pony.

>>16869814
Honest answer.

>>16870052
>every one has its ups and downs so really, pick whichever one you like the most
what's happening to /o/? Some of you are being sensible.

>>16869756
MUSTANG
U
S
T
A
N
G

File: IMG_20160906_230939.jpg (168KB, 894x715px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 894x715px

>>16871964
Thanks. I eat mustangs and camaros for breakfast in a straight line too which is what has always mattered as muscle.

As soon as they got their asses stomped they used the excuse that a track is what matters. I will keep enjoying this beast of a machine and the sheer power that the Camaro and mustang wish they had

>>16870228
nice leaf blower, your gf let you take that out for a spin in your gravel lawn when you behave?
kek upon you.

>>16872022

Don't these fucking boats get walked by 5.0 coyote mustangs with full bolt ons and a tune? lmao

fuck outta here barge.

>>16872042
>with full bolt ons and a tune?
A 3k civic could beat that Mustang and that Hellcat with a few simple mods...

>>16872051
I should've bought a 3k civic and taken my family on a nice vacation with all the gas money I'm saving, rated at an EPA combined 36mpg.

File: DSC01118.jpg (2MB, 7952x4472px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 7952x4472px

>>16872022

Hey friendo, post your slip :^)

>>16871493
>long story short, drive what you want.
I can't believe I'm on /o/ this makes so much sense... are all the neets/kids playing WoW and the adults are posting?

>>16872070
15 SECONDS

>>16872042
No...they do not beat a Hellcat unless the driver can't launch for shit. It's even more embarassing when a Hellcat is modded and pushing 800+ rwhp like a few of us. Quite a few out there with just an aluminum driveshaft and drags and the rest stock can get 10.6xx's

Your scrub Hellcat drivers at a track will be around 11.1xx - 11.2xx

Better luck next time...

>>16871255
>unable to decide between muscle car and sports car.
That is precisely what I love about mustangs

>>16872102
Man why did i laugh at that

>>16872022
Yeah but some day on the way to work we will cross paths at a cartoon based race track, then I'll get ya.
Seriously, if performance against another car is the only important factor, then straight line is all that matters. How many times have any of you tards randomly raced through multiple turns? That one time was just that one time.

2011-2015
#1 Mustang GT
#2 Camaro SS
#3 Challenger

2016+:
#1 Camaro
#2 Mustang
#3 Challenger

Mustang -- Looks the most daily drivable. Looks attractive without looking like a tryhard hot wheel. More than enough power to get pulled over if you're not diligent with the pedal.

Camaro -- See above. Try-hard. Looks like it was made for a teenage racerboi. Not fast enough to have the respect that a Corvette can attain while trying to be showy. Otherwise, great chassis and who doesn't love a big block v8? Torque for days.

Challenger -- Just looks fucking big, man. I can't get over it. It's just... fucking huge. ugh. no.

>>16872051
Please post simple mod list...

>>16872120
Poor driving will get you an 11.2?
That just proves how fast the hellcat is.

>>16872188
- 10 point cage with Parachute
- 3 piece discontinued JoJo frontend
- spec-R full drag suspension
- Fuel cell with -8 lines from tank to motor
- 1 044 bosch pump
- 1200 rc injectors
- golden eagle sleeved block
- cp 10:1 pistons
- Eagle rods
- arp headstuds
- oem h22 headgasket
- Balance shaft delete
- competition clutch twin disc
- Port and polished head
- skunk2 valve springs and retainers
- Str cam gears
- crower stage 1 cams
- aluminium radiator with slim fan
- gsr transmission with itr lsd.
- qsd h2k intake manifold adapter
- k20 rbc manifold
- qsd throttle body spacer
- blox 70mm throttle body
- 4bar omni map sensor
- 6al msd with coil and cap. 3 step launch control
- hks bov
- Garret 102mm turbocharger.
- Custom t4 front facing turbo manifold with 44mm flange
- 44mm tial wastegate
- Custom water to air intercooler set up
- aem eugo wideband w/ gauge
- tuned on chipped p28
- 13 inch volks drag rims
- 2 15 inch volks rear rims
- arp extended wheel studs
- si cluster
- 150 shots of nitrous

>>16869968
Actually the new ZL1 is faster than a GTR

>>16872225
>nitrous

lmfao

enjoy your 100hp shitter when you run out

>>16872186
>Camaro -- See above.
References his own post as if it were sacrosanct. There's the 4chin I've come to know.
Hopefully you treat the bus driver with the same reverence as your own posts, stupid.

>>16872225

I can already smell the fucking plume coming out of the engine bay

>>16872240
>t. buttblasted hotwheels driver

>>16872225
That should do it,depending on how extended those wheel studs are, of course.
But how much HP?
I assume that much power can only go to the rear tires.

>>16869968
but you look like a fag

>>16872236
not having your buddy hook up extra bottles as you drive

COME ON STEP IT UP

>>16872240
Damn, the pangs of this butthurt cuck. Just avoid racing Fords next time.

>>16872102
haha I'm glad other people still remember this
>>16872070

>>16872262
like 368 hp going to the front wheels "where it belongs"

seen the meme before

>>16872236
its meme u dipe

>>16872225
>150 shots of nitrous
He presses the button every time he up shifts in his 32 1/4 mile x4 race.
Nitrous just vents out of his hood, but he has 150 shots

>>16872277
I don't get it
pls explain

>>16872236
Let's see you shit post down hill, senpai

>>16872286

I ran a 15 second quarter mile in my 700 whp camaro. /o/ is just jealous because now I'm deep into the 14s.

>>16872280
>102mm turbo built H22A
>368hp

Go higher

>>16872297
What the fuck? how is your 700 (WHEEL) hp Camaro running 14s or 15s while hellcats even with shitty drivers can apparently run 11s or 12s?

>>16872268
>advanced projection

File: HELLCAT A SHIT.png (169KB, 560x612px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 560x612px

>>16870973
>>16870981
>>16871044
>>16871062
>>16871087

DODGE BTFO
HELLCATS BTFO
YOU FAGS BTFO
GET FUCKING WRECKED LMFAO AYYYYYYYYYYYYYY LMAO

>>16872308
shit tires I'm guessing

>>16872308
500 of that is at the front wheels, Camaros are know to have issues where only the rear wheels get power.

>>16872308
He's a shit driver.

>>16872313
>naturally aspirated mustang
>0.4 seconds slower than those two supercharged shitboxes

really gets those noodles boiling

>>16872286
A few years ago he ran a 15 second 1/4 mile in his 700whp camaro and lost to a 5.0 mustang with a few simple mods. I don't know if the other dude still posts here, it happened during the gumball rally or something

>>16872271
Go to sleep, you got school in the morning.
Don't reply.

>>16872313
11.4? that Charger would get that in his sleep. That would be about the worst stock run i've ever seen a charger or a challenger make.

>>16872313
You gave the dodge too much benefit, the challenger hellcat does significantly worse on the motortrend figure 8.

Still loses. Sad.

>>16870722
The SRT 392 Challenger has all the good suspension bits that the hellcat has.

You're thinking of the Scat Pack

Challenger owner here, so maybe I'm a little biased.

>>16869756
Challenger w/ a 392 is the better daily and the most fun to drive, at least stock.

>>16869795
>not as fast as the other two

Just barely, and unless you're looking for a track car, what do you care about a smidge of a second when 99% of the time you're going to be blasting by idiots going slow in the left lane?

>>16870722
>>16869922
Wrong, six-piston brembos are available on the T/A, T/A 392, Scat Pack (Optional), SRT, and Hellcat.

>>16872329
I don't know about you but my daily commute is actually a series of times straight lines. Have fun waking up 45 seconds earlier than me, friendo.
Also that pic implies all anyone does is race a "rival" every day. I only had one rival in my life, and he died of cirrhosis, so even though he crossed the finish line first, I'll let his fat ass claim that victory.

>>16872374
>>16872373
Looking at a t/a. Want a 392
Your opinions on what trim t/a or scat or whatever. What should I avoid or seek out and why. Please.
I know I'll be happy with whatever I get, but that's a month away and I've online build so many...
What's your opinion, fellas?

>>16872396

I have a Challenger SRT as well. People seem to love the Scat. I think a lot of it is because of the price compared to an SRT but most trims look pretty similar so if you only care about what's under the hood a Scat is a good choice. I don't think I've seen a T/A in person yet. Go test drive everything that interests you and see which one sticks.

File: sto-n-sho3.jpg (2MB, 2048x1208px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x1208px

>>16872396
T/A is the track-oriented of the two.

If you feel you need the bigger tires and brakes, go for it.

For day to day driving, the Scat Pack (what I have) is the better bang for buck and my only complaint would be the stock tires.

Get 275/40/20s ASAP, see if you can talk the salesman into letting you buy your own tires, bring them in, and have them take the stock ones in for a discount on the price of the car ($500 or so maybe)

Considering they're stock tires I'm sure they'd have no problems selling them.

>>16870140
I drive a 1964 Chevrolet Impala Super Sport. How hard I drive?Let's just say I saw the movie "Drive" a few hundred times. Other than that I really don't want to overwork the engine. Especially not in the dead summer.

>>16872503
>>16872482
Really want the T/A.
But it will be a dd so pretty much just different paint for a good chunk of money.
Thanks for the input. I know I'll love whatever I end up with.

File: 1490041575664.jpg (107KB, 477x358px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 477x358px

challenger for people who enjoy themselves and enjoy nice machines

mustangs for "country" folk

camaro for democrat voting benchracers

>>16872546
>>16872503

In hindsight, the only thing you're missing out on with the Scat Pack over the T/A, would be the hood and the paintjob. The former, you can buy later (~$800) and the later you can achieve with a vinyl wrap (~$600).

Ether way, both will put a dumb smile on your face when you turn it on or when you step on the pedal.

>>16872548
>mopar
>good
>ever

>>16872568
>dumb smile
That's what I'm all about.

>>16872651

There's may also be some maniacal cackling as you get an opening to pass the fucking idiot in the Prius going 5mph under everyone else.

I'd get a Mustang.

>>16872136
By your logic we should all drive Teslas. Move somewhere that has better roads.

>>16872758

Why?

>>16869756
The Camaro is better in every performance metric. But if it was my money I would buy the Mustang. Main reason is I can get a Brand new Mustang GT base model, for 10k less than a Brand New Camaro SS base model. I can get an almost fully loaded Mustang GT for the cost of a base SS. The Camaro isn't 10k faster.

mustangs are great for BLM rallies

>>16869795
I've driven all 3. The Camaros visibility isn't all that much of an issue day to day. The biggest complaint for me was the right rear blind spot. But the car is fairly short, so you can usually see your average car/truck in the mirror there. Something small like a miata probably not. The challenger had an even bigger RR blind spot.

CHARGER > ALL

>>16872868

I had a hell of a time with the Camaro blindspot and don't notice the one in my Challenger at all. I think like most things it depends on what you get used to.

>>16872868
If you have blind spots, you haven't got your mirrors right.

>>16869756
I'd probably get the Challenger because I like the style. I already have a car that objectively outperforms all three at the strip or on a road course, so I really don't give a shit which one of these three is fastest.

File: IMG_0841.jpg (203KB, 1024x684px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 1024x684px

>>16872022
Still cheaper than a cat with the Magnuson.
Love the hellcat tho.

>>16872341
Fuck off, you havent seen shit but some magazine times and YouTube videos faggot.

>>16870973
Do you understand MSRP you autistic fucking faggot?

Most faggots on this board would be getting the v6 or turbo 4 versions of these cars, let atlone Shelbys, Hellcats, and ZL1s... Jesus Christ you fucks are super gay cock suckers.

File: IMG_0975.jpg (4MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4032x3024px

>>16872934
Nah

File: IMG_2619.jpg (103KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1024x768px

>>16872934
>>16872965

I don't have a Hellcat, but I do have a 392.

>>16872978
I thought the r/t was a 5.7 and the 6.4 was in the scat pack and srt. Then again. They muddied up their trimmlebels a lot in '14.

>>16872990
Scat pack is an option on the R/T

File: IMAG0449.jpg (3MB, 4000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4000x3000px

>>16872934
i just have the SRT 392, not hellcat

>>16872997
It's also an option in a German brothel.

>buy hellcat
>out $60 grand, but dude hellcat lmao

vs

>buy 2014 mustang GT for $24 grand
>take it to a shop and get a supercharger and a tune for $7 grand


hmm

>>16873004
How did you get your halos to look like that? Super long exposure?

>>16872965
>posting a shit vehicle that breaks down on rev
>this much of an autist

>>16873008
>take it to a shop and get a supercharger and a tune for $7 grand
Why would you need that much horsepower?
>b-but muh red light races!
Child.

>>16873006
Well Germans are fucking weird anyways. The fuckers charge twice the price for a car with the same performance of a Camaro.

>>16873008
And have a base shitbox with a lot of power and nothing else needed to handle that power. I got the Challenger over the other options because I needed more car. I needed usable back seats and the large trunk is kinda nice.

>>16872934
I'm looking at a base model '14 civic. Current car is a 03 town car.

>>16873019
the back seats of my '14 mustang are non existent

they aren't even good at being grocery shelves

>>16873032
Yeah. I've put my kids' car seats in the back of the Hellcat. Nothing beats the looks of despair I get from dads tooling around in their Honda Odyssey when I pull my kids out of the back of that thing.

>>16873068
>u cunt win

What did he mean by this?

File: 00a0a_dkG3kkqMeT_1200x900.jpg (104KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1200x900px

>>16872934
Wat?

>>16873098
>the clownshoe in the back

THE REAL BENCHRACER IS HERE

>>16873098
>>16873068
Ladies, please.
>>16872965

>>16873079
It means he tried to figure out the storyline to all the Five Nights At Freddy's games.

>>16873098
C L O W N S H O E

>>16872268
alright at least try.

Is the Challenger becoming an adult only car? I own a Corvette so I'm used to boomers but I'm noticing that the most of the Challenger owners I meet are 40+. On average it seems like vettes are 50+, Challengers are 40+, Camaros are 30+, and Mustangs are 18+.

>>16870189
yo our taco bell ran out of those in a month. I was so fucking sad to hear that. i ended up listening to only "on gp" in my car for the next 3 days

>>16873136
Oldfags love mopar and the challenger is the one that looks the most like a classic muscle car

>>16873136
>Mustangs are 18- or 40+
Ftfy

File: 1981_Dodge_Challenger_X,_front_left.jpg (4MB, 2858x1679px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2858x1679px

>>16869756
Challenger, hands down.

>>16870558
You could just buy a mustang AND a camaro for the same price as the challenger that has brembo brakes. Obviously not comparable you biased dumb motherfucker. You knew exactly what you were doing when you posted didn't you, you little shit. YES I MAD

>>16873104
>>16873123
>not an M clownshoe

Who cares

>>16873068
Oh god, so much cringe.

>>16873155
I'd like to see an 80s daytona, charger, or challenger actually made to be a performance car.

File: scatpack3.jpg (105KB, 904x863px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 904x863px

>>16873163

My Scat Pack has 4-piston brakes.

Don't really think I need anything bigger for road use.

>>16873297
4-piston brembo brakes*

>>16873068
Lel

>>16870189
What the fuck you are both retarded, the naked chicken chalupa was just a mc chicken patty rolled around some veggies and shit tacobell. It was literally nothing. The only people that enjoyed it were people that haven't eatten the McChicken in a long time.
The mc chicken is the best fast food sandwitch and best fast food taco.

>>16870928
Compare hellcat to the GT instead of the GT with the performance package.
Man it wins who knew?
L2compare like to like m8.
With a 8k performance package I think the mustang could walk over you.
https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-6066-M8627

>>16873150
I've had my mustang from 22-29 now.

>>16870750
>looks cool

Maybe if you enjoy coitus with your direct relatives

Challenger is an ugly mockery of an actual good looking car

At least the past 10 years have aerodynamically melted the awkward retro styling of hte other two into something slighlty more modern

>>16872313
>muh track times on a muscle boat
You are trying so hard, I don't know what to say, but I guess you bought your car based on it's track performance.

File: wrd.jpg (69KB, 682x657px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 682x657px

>>16873825
eh I like it. eachtuizown

File: 20170316_164521-1.jpg (1MB, 2981x1677px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2981x1677px

>>16872934
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

>>16873825
Curve > edge, and the Challenger is all curves and the other two are all creases and edges.

>>16871416
>no v6 auto convertible mustang in hot pink

its like my parents/sugar daddy fucking hate me

File: 3PCebxg.png (231KB, 622x674px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 622x674px

>>16872022
>gets beat by literally any post 2010 v8 with 15K in the engine

face it dude you are a pussy, if you cared about straight line performance you would be in a corvette with a turbo at 20k+ less than your car, you just want street rep of being able to beat 98% of cars instead of 99.9% and payed 20k extra for a warranty, literally any car with proper tires and 700hp will beat you because they don't weight 2 tons, if you were smart and not hoodrich you would have gotten a rs7 prestige and actually have gotta something usable and faster for your money.

Literally i'm 100% sure you haven't even hit your speed limiter once pussy boi.

>>16872120
we all know you stay stock for that warranty you need because you couldn't afford better and def. can't afford a new drivetrain

>>16874718

Or maybe not everyone is a benchracing tripfag.

>>16874718
Can my p71 beat him?

>>16869756
Daily Driver/Road car: Mustang

Track car: Camaro

Irrelevant: Challenger

>>16874867
Heh

>>16872230
http://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/kgl7zdm8eal5

No it isn't.

File: Camaro zl1.jpg (231KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 1200x1600px

>>16875160
>sub-70k Camaro half a second within a nismo when driven by the same driver
Gawd musheen.

>>16875160
The one with the 1LE pkg. it's being tested right now. It hasn't been released yet so it isn't on flaps, but it's hella fast.

>>16875404
1LE might beat out both the C7 and the GTR. It would be fucking glorious.

>>16875404
>hella
shut the fuck up Cartman

File: gallery-1467818100-ford-mustang-gt-1993-fox-body.jpg (53KB, 768x560px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 768x560px

>>16869756
>not using best mustang model to debate which is better
what is wrong with you OP

>>16872374
At the lightning lap a v6 1le camaro was only .4 behind a hellcat. A fucking v6..

>>16875950
>objectively worse than the SN95 that followed it

File: MuhCamaBro.jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5312x2988px

>>16869756
If the Challenger wasn't as huge as it is and was closer to the size of the Camaro or the Mustang, I'd be driving a Challenger right now.

If the next gen Challenger's platform brings its size down to the size of the Mustang and Camaro while still still sticking to the "Modern Retro" styling, I'll probably trade my Camaro in for a 392 scat pack.

My dream car would be a smaller Challenger that can perform as well as the current Camaro.

>>16876072
only people that drive sn95s now have them stock v6 convertible its a womans car now

>>16876072
>objectively worse than the SN95 that followed it
>implying the 302 is worse than the POS 4.6
Time to go faggot

>>16876129
>he doesn't know 94-95 SN95's retained the 302 4.9L V8 and the 4.6 wasn't available until 1996

File: 1487043157370.jpg (700KB, 887x1200px) Image search: [Google]

700KB, 887x1200px

>>16876126
All Mustangs are woman cars.

>>16869756
Unless MT Jews have been bought out by GM my vote is for the Camaro.

From everything I've seen it seems to be best """"""performance"""""" for your money if you just want a fast car. However it is ugly as fuck, at least in my opinion, if they didn't look like an angry rice farmer after a hard day of work then I'd really want one.

>>16876161
Yeah, I do, and nobody thinks 5.0 when they think of an SN-95. 4.6 is the defining engine and it's a SOHC POS.

>>16876194
That's why you drop in a coyote. So much easier when you start with a 4.6.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1WKmm_6Cj4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6s-GWIgmxI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=957jh1Zw844

>>16876202
Cool, then you can have a car that has an engine worth roughly 7 times the body value and a solid rear axle waiting to kill you still. You might as well just swap a fox with a panhard bar and subframe connectors.

>>16876210
The SN95 still has a better chassis than the Fox, since it's a FOx chassis with uppgrades. Anything you can do to a Fox, you can do to an SN95. Plus, the new edge IRS bolts right in.

>>16876243
>The SN95 still has a better chassis
You mean the fox platform is a better platform than the fox platform? Because an SN-95 is a foxbody.

>>16876253
It's a fox-body with upgrades in chassis rigidity and suspension tuning compared to the 79-93 body style.

>>16876271
Panhard bar and subframe connectors and it's the same thing. And you don't look like a faggot in a SN-95.

>>16876274
>4 lug wheels and no crumple zones
I'll take the SN95. Besides. The SN95 is cheaper than the previous Fox Mustang. The 79-93 Foxes are going up in value just like everything from the 80s.

>FCA unreliable shit that hasn't been updated in a decade and is the only one that hasn't fixed its can't turn problem
"But it was only meant to go straight fast!"
>the others can do that and still turn

>>16870171
As someone who frequents /ck/ I am really enjoying the meme crossover. Just need some /o/ memes on /ck/.

File: 180px-PennLeft.png (50KB, 180x191px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 180x191px

>>16872934
R U FUCKEN RIGHT MAD, FAGGET?

>>16870228
That's because Ford is a lot better than the Dodge Clone. Dodge is pretty shitty. I had a truck that gave out on me after 4 months so I sold it and my father(slow driver) had his fail after 2 years. They are shit cars made for poor people to feel cool.

>>16876646
ITT, dodgefags jerking off each other in desparation,- in response to their poor vehicle purchases.

>>16875951

And...?

>>16876112

Stick to your Camaro, I like my hueg car.

>>16876794

>My father and I don't know how to maintain a car.

>>16876794
Ford has very low average reliability, but they also know how to make good cars when they put effort into quality control. I think they're the mcdonalds of cars right now and are just shitting out garbage to make a quick buck. I'd be surprised if they didn't have car DLC for ford soon.

Old Fords and Lincolns are amazing though.

>>16869756

Top trim performance
>Camaro

Cheap V8 performance
>Mustang

Looks
>Challenger

Balance

>>16877361
And 707hp car should be substantially faster than a 335hp car. I can't believe how shitty the fiats are. The new demon model is coming with a toolbox full of tools. Like they know you're gonna be fixing it

alright, so the most bang for buck upgrade of any of these cars would be the wheels and tires, right?

I have a '14 mustang gt and I was wondering what wheels I should get that look good and work good. Any suggestions?

>>16878780
>benchracing shitposter

Maybe if you rode something other than the bus or your sub-200hp econobox, you would understand the appeal.

Nobody who is asking about these vehicles here is looking for a track day car. They'll be asking in more specialized forums for that.

The Challengers are the better DDs just because you have space for doing regular things, like carrying a couple of friends, or groceries, or golfing, or road trip, or other shit people do for fun.

The Camaro/Mustang rear seats/trunks are a joke.

>>16878990
>The Camaro/Mustang rear seats/trunks are a joke.
they really should just toss them for a bigger trunk and more leg room 2bh

>>16879003

They would if insurance companies would stop being absolute dumb cunts.

>>16869812
>>16869795
Are you guys midgets or something? Have you ever even driven a Camaro? I have, and it was the same as any other car. I didn't have any problems with visibility OR TURNING for that matter.

>>16879003
>more leg room
They already have enough leg room for 6'6" lanklets why would they need more?

>>16879344
It doesn't matter how big you are the Camaro's rear window is letterbox-tier and the C pillars are huge, rear visibility is abysmal.

File: jilltrunkchallenger-624x468.jpg (87KB, 624x468px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 624x468px

>>16879003
This desu senpai. If Camaro ditched that joke of a back seat and gave me a big trunk I'd seriously consider it over a challenger. But as it is it's useless for anything but racing on a track, and I have a life. Challenger is both fun and practical

File: 2010-chevrolet-camaro-trunk.jpg (76KB, 750x469px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 750x469px

>>16880319
And here's the Camaro

File: maxresdefault.jpg (472KB, 2732x1534px) Image search: [Google]

472KB, 2732x1534px

Dont drop your panties ladies, real car passing through. Muscle cars are for girls, JDM is for men

File: pldmlwirjxpzuwlwmuv7.jpg (57KB, 584x365px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 584x365px

>>16880323
>posts old Camaro
At least post the new one.

>>16872878
gay cop car for little fag boys and rich white moms

>>16871862
i like dis color

File: 100_7849.jpg (284KB, 1300x975px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 1300x975px

>>16880510
Chevy had a similar one from 2010-2011.

>>16880480
damn son where'd you find this? this must be a certified /o/ pasta

>>16876794
It seems to be fairly recent though, my dad owns a '94 ram 1500 thats been going strong since he bought it (in 1994)

he replaced the water pump a few years back, and the heater core most recently, (only because he was doing something with the dash and heard that it was worth doing while he had access)


other than those two things, and a bit of rust, its in fine condition.

>>16880558
Chrysler went to shit starting in 1998.
Now what major thing happened to Chrysler in 1998? Anyone?
Say it with me now:
Mercedes Benz are a bunch of cunts!

My mom has a 2007 Mustang V6 that I got to drive quite extensively over the years. I recently bought a 2010 Challenger RT 6-speed to use as my DD. It's comfy as fuck and sounds great, but the LOLCANTTURN shit is completely true. The Mustang takes corners better, but I expected that considering it's smaller and lighter.

>>16869756
does the challenger feel lazy at 50-90mph like the chrysler R/T?
i'm used to driving my 250 hp charger but i recently took my brother's hemi on a trip to the capital and i didn't like it. you don't notice that 5.7 under the hood even when you get to 90mph it does nothing. no grunt, no feeling of speed. just raw speed

are all new automatics boring or is the engine just too powerful for boy racers to have fun just above the speed limit?

>unironically buying RWD cars and racing them on a track

lmfao

>>16882995
You won't notice anything unless you floor it and let the engine rev, a 5.7 won't be hitting high RPMs at only 90mph.

>>16883975
>implying the engine size affects the relation between rotational speed and ground speed
this is some next-level stupid, anon

>>16869795
>camaro: can't see out of it
>>16869812
>Camaro - CAN'T SEE OUT OF
>>16872868
>Camaros visibility
>>16872882
>I had a hell of a time with the Camaro blindspot
>>16880264
>It doesn't matter how big you are

Found the manlets

>>16884141
5'7 manlet here. I have no problems with the Camaros visibility.
They're just retards that never learned to compensate with mirrors.

If I bought a V8 mustang would car fags come up and talk to me? I know nothing about cars.

>>16884777
Car guy or not you'll be asked often if it's the v8, and then they will ask if its got a stick. If you answer yes to both questions then they nod and say "niiice".

>>16884777
On occasion. But that said, the V6 Camaro is still a great performance car if you want to avoid the V8 models. It's the only one of the 3 that's actually still a good car without the V8.
The V6 Mustang is literal rental car tier, and the 4 cylinder turbo is plagued by reliability problems.
On the Mustang, V8 or bust.
With the Challenger, the Pentastar V6 is a great engine, but it is by far the slowest of the three due to its heavy weight disadvantage.

If you don't want the V6 or the V8, the Camaro Ecotec I4 turbo is still a great engine

Basically, if you don't want a V8, the Camaro is the one to get

Do any of you DD your 'Maro/Stang/Ger?

>>16884896
i do. 60+ miles a day on my 16 Camaro SS M6.

just cracked 16,300 miles .

>>16884896
15 gt, drive it across town everyday been good to me so far.
>>16870228
Is mine

>>16883975
>a 5.7 won't be hitting high RPMs at only 90mph
that's pretty disappointing. especially when the suspension can't handle more than 90. it's like trying to satisfy your wife with a small penis

>>16870558
It does get better... imagine not having those brakes burdened by a 4400 lbs car

>>16884850
That literally happened to me at Sunoco the other day

>>16884850
what if one of the answers is a no

My gf said i cant get a mustang b/c girls drive them

>>16869756
challenger because it's the only one resembeling a muscle car.
Rest pretend they're spots cars and suck at it.

>>16886733
"oh. Shoulda got the V8"
or
"oh. Shoulda got the stick"

>>16869756
they all look like hotwheel boomer mobiles
they all have shit visibility
they all have plastic interiors

i'd still go for the stang.

>>16886733
Children will even be disappointed with you.

>>16886788
>>16886841
living in the city is a good excuse to not get a stick r-right?

>>16886854
just buy a scooter, you little city cuck

>>16886854
no.

>>16886858
I want to get a stick but idk how to drive one. I couldnt get the car off the lot. will the dealership teach me if it means selling one?

>>16886879
should've had a good dad

>>16886891
Died when I was young and my mom never whored out and got remarried

>>16879344
Yah most of the people meming about the visibility are manlets.

>>16880264
So when you're changing lanes do you physically move your body so you can see 160 degrees behind you? No you look at the sideview mirror to tell if the lane is clear. When backing up it can be tricky and I'll give you that. Other sporty cars also have terrible rear visibility. Blame safety regulations.

>>16886854
living in the city would be an argument for me to do get a stick.
Muh response control is so much faster in a manual.

but in ever other way auto's are superior

>>16886913
>Yah most of the people meming about the visibility are manlets.
see
>>16884163

File: [HorribleSubs] Kyoukai no Rinne - 21 [720p].mkv_snapshot_01.14_[2015.08.27_01.16.27] (2016_01_05 00_50_19 UTC).jpg (61KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1280x720px

>>16885015
How do you minimize rock chips on bumper and windshield? How long does it take to get used to that gut-wrenching feeling when you see new rock chips every day?

>>16886733
fuckin' lie

stop bumping your meme thread you drooling mongo. fucking saged.

>>16870213
You realize the bmw beat it in that video?

>>16888306
You do realize a fart would've made a difference in those times, right?
Those times are 'within the noise' meaning you could run that same test a million times and the numbers would vary, but they're so close together it doesn't matter
>He thinks less than a tenth of a second is a reason to spend twice the money for a BMW badge